Research Article
Selecting the Optimal Combination Model of FSSVM for the Imbalance Datasets
Table 4
The best G-means (%) of the proposed FSSVMs compare with other class imbalanced methods.
| Methods | Abanole | Yeast | Satimage | Haberman | Pima |
| NSVM | 19.39 | 58.80 | 81.05 | 42.46 | 68.86 | Under. | 73.19 | 83.31 | 89.13 | 62.06 | 72.51 | Over. | 72.73 | 83.77 | 88.75 | 64.49 | 72.77 | SMOTE | 72.69 | 83.23 | 87.64 | 62.33 | 73.08 | ADASYN | 62.91 | 82.46 | 88.21 | 63.76 | 66.25 | Z-SVM | 56.26 | 78.89 | 86.43 | 62.89 | 74.94 | SVM | 73.26 | — | — | — | 73.68 | SVM | — | 85.54 | — | — | — | SVM | — | — | 94.40 | 66.48 | — |
|
|