Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 541292, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/541292
Research Article

Software Quality Evaluation Model Based on Weighted Mutation Rate Correction Incompletion G1 Combination Weights

School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China

Received 1 May 2014; Revised 24 July 2014; Accepted 29 July 2014; Published 17 August 2014

Academic Editor: Hailin Liu

Copyright © 2014 Chuanyang Ruan and Jianhui Yang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. W. Boehm, J. R. Brown, and M. Lipow, “Quantitative evaluation of software quality,” in Proceedings of the of the 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 592–605, 1976.
  2. S. Sarkar, G. M. Rama, and A. C. Kak, “API-based and information-theoretic metrics for measuring the quality of software modularization,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 14–32, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Yue, Z. Su, Y. Lu, and G. Zhang, “Comprehensive evaluation of software quality based on fuzzy soft sets,” Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1460–1466, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N. J. Pizzi, “Software quality prediction using fuzzy integration: a case study,” Soft Computing, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. Y. Khramov and P. N. Besedin, “Use of fuzzy situations in assessment of software quality,” Telecommunications and Radio Engineering, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 455–464, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Z. Shi and X. He, “Fuzzy software quality synthesis evaluation,” Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 121–122, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. H. Zhou, Z. Wang, Z. K. Yang et al., “Research on software quality evaluation based on fuzzy method,” Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 988–991, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  8. Y. A. Yang, “synthetic evaluation method for software quality,” Mini-Micro System, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 313–315, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  9. Y. J. Guo, Comprehensive Evaluation Theory, Methods and Extensions, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2012.
  10. Y. M. Zhang, G. T. Chi, and L. A. Xu, “Comprehensive evaluation of human all-round development based on entropy method: model and empirical study,” Chinese Journal of Management, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1047–1055, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  11. G. T. Chi, G. Li, and Y. Q. Cheng, “The human all-round development evaluation model based on AHP and standard deviation and empirical study,” Chinese Journal of Management, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 301–310, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  12. Y. Wang, Y. Jiao, and H. Li, “An evolutionary algorithm for solving nonlinear bilevel programming based on a new constraint-handling scheme,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics C, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 221–232, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Wang and C. Dang, “An evolutionary algorithm for global optimization based on level-set evolution and latin squares,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 579–595, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Li, B. Wang, L. Zhou, M. Zhang, and K. Chen, “The human all-round development evaluation model based on revised G1 by standard deviation and empirical research,” System Engineering Theory and Practice, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 2473–2485, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. T. Chi, F. Qi, and G. Li, “The evaluation model of scientific development concept for Chinese provinces based on combination weighting of improved Group-G1 and its application,” System Engineering Theory & Practice, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1448–1457, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Hong and Q. Wang, “Analysis of the accuracy of expert judgment and method to identify the star-level of expert,” Fudan Education Forum, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 59–63, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. X. Sun, Prediction and Evaluation, Zhejiang Education Publishing House, Hangzhou, China, 1986.
  18. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7/WG6, ISO/IEC 9126-1: Information Technology Software Quality Characteristics and Metrics—Part 1: Quality Model.
  19. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7/WG6, ISO/IEC 14598 Part 1-Part 6: Information Technology Evaluation of Software Product.
  20. L. B. Yang and Y. Y. Gao, Principle and Application of Fuzzy Mathematics, South China University of Technology Press, Guangzhou, China, 2002.
  21. Z. Shi and X. G. He, “The fuzziness of software quality and its representation,” Computer Engineering and Design, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1–4, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  22. Z. J. Wang and R. D. Hu, “Amended weighed coefficient of variation: the useful index for measuring the degree of income distribution equality,” The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, no. 6, pp. 134–137, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  23. X. J. Hong and J. C. Li, “A further study about some problems of the Gini coefficient,” The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, vol. 2, pp. 86–96, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  24. Z. S. Xu, “On consistency improving method in analytic Hierarchy process,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 126, pp. 683–687, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  25. F. Liu, W. G. Zhang, and Z. X. Wang, “A goal programming model for incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations and its application in group decision-making,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 218, no. 3, pp. 747–754, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  26. P. Groselj and L. Z. Stirn, “Acceptable consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 417–420, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus