Research Article
Solving Nonstiff Higher Order Odes Using Variable Order Step Size Backward Difference Directly
Table 4
Comparison between the 1PBDVSO, DI, B1, and D1 methods for solving Problem
2.
| TOL | MTD | STEPS | FS | MAXE | AVER | TIME (total) |
| 10−2 | D1 B1 DI 1PBDVSO | 135 134 96 173 | 0 0 0 0 | 4.83764 (−2) 2.63945 (−2) 4.99681 (−3) 1.01436 (−4) | 3.21705 (−2) 2.14665 (−2) 2.47698 (−3) 8.58874 (−5) | 6621 4358 1961 3218 |
| 10−3 | D1 B1 DI 1PBDVSO | 175 121 157 162 | 1 0 0 0 | 8.81849 (−3) 3.90401 (−2) 6.91170 (−5) 2.40484 (−3) | 5.48179 (−3) 1.65274 (−2) 4.87625 (−5) 1.71894 (−3) | 8294 3896 2890 3005 |
| 10−4 | D1 B1 DI 1PBDVSO | 233 173 141 142 | 2 0 0 0 | 2.85719 (−3) 1.44401 (−3) 1.79264 (−4) 2.60404 (−4) | 1.39202 (−3) 9.91992 (−4) 1.19952 (−4) 1.89056 (−4) | 11684 5520 2622 2635 |
| 10−5 | D1 B1 DI 1PBDVSO | 226 263 238 237 | 1 2 0 0 | 3.05429 (−4) 1.97450 (−4) 5.14212 (−6) 1.03862 (−5) | 1.22401 (−4) 5.02997 (−5) 3.89969 (−6) 8.18350 (−6) | 11095 8492 4137 4268 |
| 10−6 | D1 B1 DI 1PBDVSO | 337 262 214 218 | 1 0 0 0 | 1.12897 (−5) 6.52399 (−5) 1.18826 (−5) 1.56415 (−6) | 5.53620 (−6) 2.34931 (−5) 9.01852 (−6) 1.09680 (−6) | 16060 8429 3766 3941 |
| 10−7 | D1 B1 DI 1PBDVSO | 421 337 368 370 | 2 0 0 0 | 4.00671 (−7) 1.70966 (−6) 1.79221 (−7) 2.75078 (−7) | 4.00671 (−7) 1.05119 (−6) 1.35202 (−7) 1.91969 (−7) | 19735 10899 6213 6584 |
| 10−8 | D1 B1 DI 1PBDVSO | 610 523 335 336 | 4 3 1 0 | 3.05239 (−7) 4.90321 (−8) 3.11508 (−8) 3.64286 (−8) | 2.22380 (−7) 3.52515 (−8) 2.58590 (−8) 1.21667 (−8) | 29060 16840 5641 5996 |
| 10−9 | D1 B1 DI 1PBDVSO | 534 555 578 575 | 2 5 1 0 | 4.96195 (−8) 9.16995 (−8) 1.20539 (−8) 3.80099 (−9) | 1.71145 (−8) 5.35093 (−8) 9.25523 (−9) 2.95718 (−9) | 25234 17610 9347 10114 |
| 10−10 | D1 B1 DI 1PBDVSO | 800 671 516 517 | 2 4 0 0 | 2.12904 (−10) 8.63683 (−10) 8.37294 (−10) 3.30834 (−9) | 1.21736 (−10) 3.89440 (−10) 6.51148 (−10) 2.52921 (−9) | 38235 21617 8541 9011 |
|
|