Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 592326, 20 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/592326
Research Article

A Novel Multiperson Game Approach for Linguistic Multicriteria Decision Making Problems

1Department of Industrial Education and Technology, National Changhua University of Education, 2 Shi-Da Road, Changhua County, Changhua City 500, Taiwan
2Department of Information Management, National United University, 1 Lienda Road, Miaoli County, Miaoli City 36003, Taiwan
3Institute of Mechatronoptic Systems and Department of Automation Engineering, Chienkuo Technology University, No. 1 Chiehshou North Road, Changhua City 500, Taiwan
4Department of International Business, National Chi Nan University, 1 University Road, Nantou County, Puli City 54561, Taiwan

Received 1 September 2013; Revised 2 November 2013; Accepted 24 November 2013; Published 2 February 2014

Academic Editor: Ching-Ter Chang

Copyright © 2014 Ching-San Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. von Neumann and D. Morgenstern, The Theory of Games and Economics Behavior, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1944.
  2. F. Bellotti, R. Berta, A. de Gloria et al., “Designing a course for stimulating entrepreneurship in higher education through serious games,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 15, pp. 174–186, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Berga, G. Bergantiños, J. Massó, and A. Neme, “An undominated Nash equilibrium for voting by committees with exit,” Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 152–175, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. R. Hoogeweegen, D. W. van Liere, P. H. M. Vervest, L. H. van der Meijden, and I. de Lepper, “Strategizing for mass customization by playing the business networking game,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1402–1412, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Moschini, “Nash equilibrium in strictly competitive games: live play in soccer,” Economics Letters, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 365–371, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Q. Song and A. Kandel, “A fuzzy approach to strategic games,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 634–642, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Campos, “Fuzzy linear programming models to solve fuzzy matrix games,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 275–289, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Sakawa and I. Nishizaki, “Max-min solutions for fuzzy multiobjective matrix games,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 53–69, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. H. Wang, A fuzzy approach on N-person multi attribute noncooperative game [M.S. thesis], I-Shou University, 2004.
  10. P. Y. Liao, Analyzing the wireless LAN market: an approach of two person zero sum game with multiple fuzzy goals [M.S. thesis], National Chiao Tung University, 2006.
  11. G. N. Angelou and A. A. Economides, “A multi-criteria game theory and real-options model for irreversible ICT investment decisions,” Telecommunications Policy, vol. 33, no. 10-11, pp. 686–705, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. A. Reneke, “A game theory formulation of decision making under conditions of uncertainty and risk,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. e1239–e1246, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Madani and J. R. Lund, “A Monte-Carlo game theoretic approach for Multi-Criteria Decision Making under uncertainty,” Advances in Water Resources, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 607–616, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. Monroy and F. R. Fernández, “The Shapley-Shubik index for multi-criteria simple games,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 122–128, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. S. Barough, M. V. Shoubi, and M. J. E. Skardi, “Application of game theory approach in solving the construction project conflicts,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 58, pp. 1586–1593, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  16. D.-F. Li and F.-X. Hong, “Solving constrained matrix games with payoffs of triangular fuzzy numbers,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 64, pp. 432–446, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Monroy and F. R. Fernández, “Stable sets and cores for multi-criteria simple games and for their extensions,” Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. Lozan and V. Ungureanu, “The set of pareto-nash equilibria in multicriteria strategic games,” Computer Science, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 58–70, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  19. L. Pusillo and S. Stef Tijs, “E-equilibria for multicriteria games,” in Advances in Dynamic Games, pp. 217–228, Birkhäauser, Boston, Mass, USA, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  20. T. Kawamura, T. Kanazawa, and T. Ushio, “Evolutionarily and neutrally stable strategies in multicriteria games,” IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 814–820, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  21. S. K. Roy and C. B. Das, “Multicriteria entropy bimatrix goal game: a fuzzy programming approach,” Journal of Uncertain Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 108–117, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  22. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Z. Xu, “Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 452–467, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. R. Yager, “An approach to ordinal decision making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 12, no. 3-4, pp. 237–261, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C.-T. Lin and Y.-T. Chen, “Bid/no-bid decision-making: a fuzzy linguistic approach,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 585–593, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R.-C. Wang and S.-J. Chuu, “Group decision-making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a manufacturing system,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 154, no. 3, pp. 563–572, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. W.-P. Wang, “A fuzzy linguistic computing approach to supplier evaluation,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 3130–3141, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C.-T. Chen, “Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C.-T. Chen and W.-Z. Hung, “A new decision-making method for stock portfolio selection based on computing with linguistic assessment,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, vol. 2009, Article ID 897024, 20 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. E. Herrera-Viedma and E. Peis, “Evaluating the informative quality of documents in SGML format from judgements by means of fuzzy linguistic techniques based on computing with words,” Information Processing and Management, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 233–249, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Pang and J. Liang, “Evaluation of the results of multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic information,” Omega, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 294–301, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-II,” Information Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 301–357, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. T. Chen, P. F. Pai, and W. Z. Hung, “A two-phase fuzzy decision-making method based on multigranular linguistic assessment,” African Journal of Business Management, pp. 7198–7213, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Kaufmann and M. M. Gupta, Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications, International Thomson Computer Press, London, UK, 1991.
  35. E. S. Lee and R.-J. Li, “Comparison of fuzzy numbers based on the probability measure of fuzzy events,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 887–896, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Bevilacqua, F. E. Ciarapica, and G. Giacchetta, “A fuzzy-QFD approach to supplier selection,” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 14–27, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L.-S. Chen and C.-H. Cheng, “Selecting IS personnel use fuzzy GDSS based on metric distance method,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 803–820, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C.-H. Cheng and Y. Lin, “Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 174–186, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Modarres and S. Sadi-Nezhad, “Ranking fuzzy numbers by preference ratio,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 429–436, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus