Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 697895, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/697895
Research Article

Risk-Sensitive Multiagent Decision-Theoretic Planning Based on MDP and One-Switch Utility Functions

School of Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received 28 April 2014; Accepted 16 June 2014; Published 7 July 2014

Academic Editor: Wei Zhang

Copyright © 2014 Wei Zeng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Boutilier, T. Dean, and S. Hanks, “Decision-theoretic planning: structural assumptions and computational leverage,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 11, pp. 1–94, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. D. E. Bell, “One-switch utility functions and a measure of risk,” Management Science, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1416–1424, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. G. M. Gelles and D. W. Mitchell, “Broadly decreasing risk aversion,” Management Science, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1432–1439, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Nakamura, “Sumex utility functions,” Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. D. E. Bell and P. C. Fishburn, “Strong one-switch utility,” Management Science, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 601–604, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Liu, Decision-theoretic planning under risk-sensitive planning objectives [Ph.D. thesis], College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2005.
  7. Y. Liu and S. Koenig, “Risk-sensitive planning with one-switch utility functions: value iteration,” in Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 993–999, 2005.
  8. Y. Liu and S. Koenig, “An exact algorithm for solving MDPs under risk-sensitive planning objectives with one-switch utility functions,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2008.
  9. R. A. Howard and J. E. Matheson, “Risk-sensitive Markov decision processes,” Management Science, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 356–369, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. S. D. Patek, “On terminating Markov decision processes with a risk-averse objective function,” Automatica, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1379–1386, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Hernandez-Hernández and S. I. Marcus, “Risk sensitive control of Markov processes in countable state space,” Systems and Control Letters, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 147–155, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Le and L. Tallec, Robust, risk-sensitive, and data-driven control of Markov decision processes [Ph.D dissertation], Sloan School of Management , Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007.
  13. P. H. Iz, “Two multiple criteria group decision support systems based on mathematical programming and ranking methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 61, no. 1-2, pp. 245–253, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  14. S. J. Chen and C. L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, vol. 375 of Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. R. J. Li, “Fuzzy method in group decision making,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 91–101, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. R. Benayoun, J. de Montgolfier, and J. Tergny, “Linear programming with multiple objective functions: step method (stem),” Mathematical Programming, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 366–375, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. A. M. Geoffrion, J. S. Dyer, and A. Feinberg, “An interactive approach for multi-criterion optimization, with an application to the operation of academic department,” Management Science, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 357–368, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  18. Z. Xu, “Approaches to multi-stage multi-attribute group decision making,” International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 121–146, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  19. D. P. Bertsekas and J. N. Tsitsiklis, “An analysis of stochastic shortest path problems,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 580–595, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. S. D. Patek, “On terminating Markov decision processes with a risk-averse objective function,” Automatica, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1379–1386, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  21. I. Tsetlin and R. L. Winkler, “Multiattribute one-switch utility,” Management Science, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 602–605, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus