Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 709872, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/709872
Research Article

A Hybrid Multiple Criteria Group Decision-Making Approach for Green Supplier Selection in the TFT-LCD Industry

Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, National Tsing Hua University, 101 Section 2, Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan

Received 12 May 2014; Revised 19 July 2014; Accepted 20 July 2014; Published 12 August 2014

Academic Editor: Ren-Jieh Kuo

Copyright © 2014 Che-Wei Tsui and Ue-Pyng Wen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Taiwan Stock Exchange, “Industry analysis: the flat panel display Industry,” February 2013, http://www.twse.com.tw/ch/products/publication/essay.php.
  2. S. Hung, “Competitive strategies for Taiwan's thin film transistor-liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) industry,” Technology in Society, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 349–361, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. Ho, X. Xu, and P. K. Dey, “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Chai, J. N. K. Liu, and E. W. T. Ngai, “Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 3872–3885, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Govindan, S. Rajendran, J. Sarkis, and P. Murugesan, “Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Herva and E. Roca, “Review of combined approaches and multi-criteria analysis for corporate environmental evaluation,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 39, pp. 355–371, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Seuring, “A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1513–1520, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Igarashi, L. De Boer, and A. M. Fet, “What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development,” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 247–263, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Genovese, S. C. Koh, G. Bruno, and E. Esposito, “Greener supplier selection: state of the art and some empirical evidence,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2868–2886, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. H. I. Lee, H. Y. Kang, C. F. Hsu, and H. C. Hung, “A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 7917–7927, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. Tuzkaya, A. Ozgen, D. Ozgen, and U. R. Tuzkaya, “Environmental performance evaluation of suppliers: a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 477–490, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. J. Kuo, Y. C. Wang, and F. C. Tien, “Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1161–1170, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Q. Zhu, Y. Dou, and J. Sarkis, “A portfolio-based analysis for green supplier management using the analytical network process,” Supply Chain Management, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 306–319, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Büyüközkan, “An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for green supplier evaluation,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 2892–2909, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. G. Büyüközkan and G. Çifçi, “A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 3000–3011, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. H. Hsu, F. K. Wang, and G. H. Tzeng, “The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 66, pp. 95–111, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. Govindan, R. Khodaverdi, and A. Jafarian, “A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 47, pp. 345–354, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. Shen, L. Olfat, K. Govindan, R. Khodaverdi, and A. Diabat, “A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier's performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 74, pp. 170–179, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Yazdani, “An integrated MCDM approach to green supplier selection,” International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 443–458, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  20. T. Chen and J. Freeman, “Using AHP-Entropy weight and TOPSIS methodology in green supplier selection,” in Proceedings of the European Operations Management Association Conference (EurOMA '14), Palermo, Italy, June 2014.
  21. D. Kannan, A. B. L. D. S. Jabbour, and C. J. C. Jabbour, “Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 233, no. 2, pp. 432–447, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. H. Zhao and S. Guo, “Selecting green supplier of thermal power equipment by using a Hybrid MCDM Method for sustainability,” Sustainability, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 217–235, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer Science, Boston, Mass, USA, 2005.
  24. B. Roy, “The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods,” Theory and Decision, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 49–73, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. J. Hokkanen and P. Salminen, “Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 19–36, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  26. R. J. Lin, “Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 40, pp. 32–39, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. L. Tseng and A. S. F. Chiu, “Evaluating firm's green supply chain management in linguistic preferences,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 40, pp. 22–31, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Büyüközkan and G. Çifçi, “A novel fuzzy mulati -criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information,” Computers in Industry, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 164–174, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  29. M. T. Escobar and J. M. Moreno-Jiménez, “Aggregation of individual preference structures in AHP-group decision making,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 287–301, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. V. Tsyganok, “Investigation of the aggregation effectiveness of expert estimates obtained by the pairwise comparison method,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 52, no. 3-4, pp. 538–544, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. J. J. Bernardo and J. M. Blin, “A programming model of consumer choice among multi-attributed brands,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 111–118, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. P. K. Humphreys, Y. K. Wong, and F. T. S. Chan, “Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 138, no. 1–3, pp. 349–356, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. Bai and J. Sarkis, “Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 252–264, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. X. Fu, Q. Zhu, and J. Sarkis, “Evaluating green supplier development programs at a telecommunications systems provider,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 357–367, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Amindoust, S. Ahmed, A. Saghafinia, and A. Bahreininejad, “Sustainable supplier selection: a ranking model based on fuzzy inference system,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1668–1677, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. K. Shaw, R. Shankar, S. S. Yadav, and L. S. Thakur, “Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 8182–8192, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Awasthi, S. S. Chauhan, and S. K. Goyal, “A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 370–378, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. Y. Chiou, H. K. Chan, F. Lettice, and S. H. Chung, “The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 822–836, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. T. L. Saaty, “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 234–281, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  40. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  41. C. Macharis, J. Springael, K. De Brucker, and A. Verbeke, “PROMETHEE and AHP: the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 307–317, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Zeleny, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York , NY, USA, 1982.
  43. C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey, Springer, New York, NY. USA, 1981. View at MathSciNet
  44. B. Roy, “ELECTRE III: un algorithme de classements fondé sur une repré sentation floue des préférences en préferences en presence de critéres multiples,” Cahiers du Centre d’Etudes de Recherche Opérationnelle, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 3–24, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  45. P. Vincke, Multiple Criteria Decision-Aid, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1992.
  46. M. Rogers and M. Bruen, “Using ELECTRE III to choose route for Dublin Port motorway,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 313–323, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. Rogers and M. Bruen, ELECTRE and Decision Support: Methods and Applications in Engineering and Infrastructure Investment, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass, USA, 2000.
  48. V. Belton and T. J. Stewart, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass, USA, 2002.
  49. B. Chang, C. W. Chang, and C. H. Wu, “Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1850–1858, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus