Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 792563, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/792563
Research Article

Information Exchange rather than Topology Awareness: Cooperation between P2P Overlay and Traffic Engineering

1National Engineering Laboratory for Next Generation Internet Interconnection Devices, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
2State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China

Received 3 November 2013; Revised 26 February 2014; Accepted 13 March 2014; Published 3 April 2014

Academic Editor: Yang Shi

Copyright © 2014 Jia Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. Liu, H. Zhang, W. Gongt, and D. Towsley, “On the interaction between overlay routing and underlay routing,” in Proceedings of the 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM '05), pp. 2543–2553, Miami, Fla, USA, March 2005. View at Scopus
  2. D. DiPalantino and R. Johari, “Traffic engineering vs. content distribution: a game theoretic perspective,” in Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM '09), pp. 540–548, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, April 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Seetharaman, V. Hilt, M. Hofmann, and M. Ammar, “Resolving cross-layer conflict between overlay routing and traffic engineering,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1964–1977, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Wang, N. Wang, M. Howarth, and G. Pavlou, “On the interactions between non-cooperative P2P overlay and traffic engineering behaviors,” in Proceedings of the 53rd IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM '10), Miami, Fla, USA, December 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Kurian and K. Sarac, “A survey on the design, applications, and enhancements of application-layer overlay networks,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 43, no. 1, article 5, 34 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Dai, F. Liu, and B. Li, “The disparity between P2P overlays and ISP underlays: issues, existing solutions, and challenges,” IEEE Network, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 36–41, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Birke, E. Leonardi, M. Mellia et al., “Architecture of a network-aware P2P-TV application: the NAPA-WINE approach,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 154–163, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. P. Manzillo, L. Ciminiera, G. Marchetto, and F. Risso, “CLOSER: a collaborative locality-aware overlay SERvice,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1030–1037, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Ren, E. Tan, T. Luo, S. Chen, L. Guo, and X. Zhang, “TopBT: a topology-aware and infrastructure-independent BitTorrent client,” in Proceedings of the 29th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM '10), San Diego, Calif, USA, March 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Raza, G. Huang, C. N. Chuah, S. Seetharaman, and J. P. Singh, “MeasuRouting: a framework for routing assisted traffic monitoring,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. R. Sharafat, S. Das, G. Parulkar, and N. McKeown, “MPLS-TE and MPLS VPNs with OpenFlow,” in Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2011 Conference, pp. 452–453, Ontario, Canada, August 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Sundaresan, C. Lumezanu, N. Feamster, and P. Francois, “Autonomous traffic engineering with self-configuring topologies,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Autonomic Computing (SIGCOMM '10), pp. 417–418, New Delhi, India, September 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. Wang, K. H. Ho, G. Pavlou, and M. Howarth, “An overview of routing optimization for internet traffic engineering,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 36–56, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  14. V. Aggarwal, A. Feldmann, and C. Scheideler, “Can ISPs and P2P users cooperate for improved performance?” ACM Computer Communication Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 29–40, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  15. H. Xie, Y. R. Yang, A. Krishnamurthy, Y. G. Liu, and A. Silberschatz, “P4p: provider portal for applications,” in Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 Conference on Data Communication, pp. 351–362, Seattle, Wash, USA, August 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. Jiang, Z. S. Rui, J. Rexford, and M. Chiang, “Cooperative content distribution and traffic engineering in an ISP network,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems (SIGMETRICS '09), pp. 239–250, Seattle, Wash, USA, June 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. Lee, A. Nakao, and J. Kim, “BiCo: network operator-friendly P2P traffic control through bilateral cooperation with peers,” Computer Networks, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2023–2034, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Dán, T. Hoßfeld, S. Oechsner et al., “Interaction patterns between P2P content distribution systems and ISPs,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 222–230, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Xu, T. Liu, J. Guan, H. Zhang, and G. M. Muntean, “CMT-QA: quality-aware adaptive concurrent multipath data transfer in heterogeneous wireless networks,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 2193–2205, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. C. Xu, F. Zhao, J. Guan, H. Zhang, and G. M. Muntean, “QoE-Driven user-Centric VoD services in urban multihomed P2P-based vehicular networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 2273–2289, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. J. F. Nash, “Non-cooperative games,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 54, pp. 286–295, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  22. R. Selten, “Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games,” International Journal of Game Theory, vol. 4, no. 1-2, pp. 25–55, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  23. H. Van Stackelberg, D. Bazin, R. Hill, and L. Urch, Market Structure and Equilibrium, Springer, 2011.
  24. M. J. Osborne, An Introduction to Game Theory, Oxford University Press, 2004.
  25. N. Wang, K. H. Ho, and G. Pavlou, “AMPLE: an adaptive traffic engineering system based on virtual routing topologies,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 185–191, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Abilene, http://www.internet2.edu.
  27. GT-ITM’s Web Site, http://www.cc.gatech.edu/projects/gtitm/.
  28. H. Zheng, E. K. Lua, M. Pias, and T. G. Griffin, “Internet routing policies and round-trip-times,” Passive and Active Network Measurement, vol. 3431, pp. 236–250, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  29. Y. Zhang, “Abilene traffic matrix,” http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~yzhang/research/AbileneTM/.
  30. J. S. Otto, M. A. Sánchez, D. R. Choffnes, F. E. Bustamante, and G. Siganos, “On blind mice and the elephant: understanding the network impact of a large distributed system,” in Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2011 Conference, pp. 110–121, Ontario, Canada, August 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus