Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 916820, 22 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/916820
Research Article

Seismic-Parameter-Based Statistical Procedures for the Approximate Assessment of Structural Damage

Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Structural Mechanics and Earthquake Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Vas. Sofias 12, 67100 Xanthi, Greece

Received 9 August 2013; Revised 2 January 2014; Accepted 6 January 2014; Published 23 February 2014

Academic Editor: Yuri Petryna

Copyright © 2014 A. Elenas. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Cabañas, B. Benito, and M. Herráiz, “An approach to the measurement of the potential structural damage of earthquake ground motions,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 79–92, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Elenas and K. Meskouris, “Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures,” Engineering Structures, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 698–704, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Arias, “A measure of earthquake intensity,” in Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants, R. J. Hansen, Ed., pp. 438–483, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  4. K. Meskouris, Structural Dynamics: Models, Methods, Examples, Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, Germany, 2000.
  5. R. L. Husid, “Analisis de terremotos: analisis general,” Revista del IDEM, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 21–42, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. D. Trifunac and A. G. Brady, “A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 581–626, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  7. P. C. Jennings, “Engineering seismology,” in Earthquakes: Observation, Theory and Interpretation, H. Kanamori and E. Boschi, Eds., pp. 138–173, Italian Physical Society, Varenna, Italy, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  8. G. W. Housner, “Spectrum intensities of strong motion earthquakes,” in Proceedings of the Symposium on Earthquake and Blast Effects on Structures, pp. 20–36, EERI, Oakland, Calif, USA, 1952.
  9. A. J. Kappos, “Sensitivity of calculated inelastic seismic response to input motion characteristics,” in Proceedings of the 4th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 25–34, EERI, Oakland, Calif, USA, 1990.
  10. J. E. Martínez-Rueda, “Scaling procedure for natural accelerograms based on a system of spectrum intensity scales,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 135–152, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings, ATC 3-06 Publication, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA, 1978.
  12. D. Lungu, A. Aldea, A. Zaicenco, and T. Cornea, “PSHA and GIS technology-tools for seismic hazard macrozonation in Eastern Europe,” in Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1998, CD-ROM.
  13. C.-M. Uang and V. V. Bertero, “Evaluation of seismic energy in structures,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 77–90, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Araya and G. R. Saragoni, “Earthquake accelerogram destructiveness potential factor,” in Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 835–842, EERI, El Cerrito, Calif, USA, 1984.
  15. E. H. Vanmarcke and S. S. P. Lai, “Strong-motion duration and RMS amplitude of earthquake records,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1293–1307, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  16. K. Meskouris, W. B. Krätzig, and U. Hanskötter, “Nonlinear computer simulations of seismically excited wall-stiffened reinforced concrete buildings,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Structural Dynamics (EURODYN '93), pp. 49–54, Balkema, Lisse, The Netherlands, 1993.
  17. A. K. Chopra, Dynamics of Structures, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1995.
  18. P. Fajfar, T. Vidic, and M. Fischinger, “A measure of earthquake motion capacity to damage medium-period structures,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 236–242, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y.-J. Park and A. H.-S. Ang, “Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 722–739, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. J. Park, A. H.-S. Ang, and Y. K. Wen, “Damage-limiting aseismic design of buildings,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. M. Reinhorn, H. Roh, M. Sivaselvan et al., “IDARC2D version 7.0: a program for the inelastic damage analysis of structures,” Tech. Rep. MCEER-09-0006, MCEER, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York, NY, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  22. Y. H. Chai, M. J. N. Priestley, and F. Seible, “Analytical model for steel-jacketed RC circular bridge columns,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 120, no. 8, pp. 2358–2376, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. Di Pasquale and A. S. Cakmak, “Detection and assessment of seismic structural damage,” Tech. Rep. NCEER-87-0015, NCEER, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York, NY, USA, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Rodriguez-Gómez and A. S. Cakmak, “Evaluation of seismic damage indices for reinforced concrete structures,” Tech. Rep. NCEER-90-0022, NCEER, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York, NY, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  25. S. K. V. Gunturi and H. C. Shah, “Building specific damage estimation,” in Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 6001–6006, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1992.
  26. EC2, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
  27. EC8, Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions, and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
  28. D. C. Montgomery and G. C. Runger, Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  29. Statpoint Technologies Inc., STATGRAPHICS Centurion XV User Manual, StatPoint, Herndon, Va, USA, 2005.
  30. W. Navidi, Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  31. D. Gasparini and E. H. Vanmarcke, SIMQKE—A Program for Artificial Motion Generation, User’s Manual and Documentation, Publication no. R76-4, Civil Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1976.
  32. S. Sharma, Applied Multivariate Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
  33. A. Elenas, “Alternative intelligent techniques for seismic damage classification of buildings based on seismic intensity parameters,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Soft Computing Technology in Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, pp. 17–39, Civil-Comp Press, Crete, Greece, 2011.