Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 972304, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/972304
Research Article

3D Maps Representation Using GNG

University Institute for Computing Research, University of Alicante, P.O. Box 99, 03080 Alicante, Spain

Received 6 March 2014; Accepted 24 July 2014; Published 27 August 2014

Academic Editor: Yi Chen

Copyright © 2014 Vicente Morell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Fox, S. Thrun, and W. Burgard, Probabilistic Robotics, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2005.
  2. M. Herbert, C. Caillas, E. Krotkov, I. S. Kweon, and T. Kanade, “Terrain mapping for a roving planetary explorer,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, pp. 997–1002, 1989.
  3. R. Triebel, P. Pfaff, and W. Burgard, “Multi-level surface maps for outdoor terrain mapping and loop closing,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '06), pp. 2276–2282, October 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Elfes, “Using occupancy grids for mobile robot perception and navigation,” Computer, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 46–57, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Stepan, M. Kulich, and L. Preucil, “Robust data fusion with occupancy grid,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics C, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 106–115, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  6. B. Schiele and J. L. Crowley, “A comparison of position estimation techniques using occupancy grids,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 12, no. 3-4, pp. 163–171, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. I. Connolly, “Cumulative generation of octree models from range data,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 1, pp. 25–32, March 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. K. M. Wurm, A. Hornung, M. Bennewitz, C. Stachniss, and W. Burgard, “OctoMap: a probabilistic, flexible, and compact 3D map representation for robotic systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '10), 2010. View at Google Scholar
  9. L. Kobbelt and M. Botsch, “A survey of point-based techniques in computer graphics,” Computers and Graphics, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 801–814, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Wang, J. Chen, and B. Yuan, “Simplified representation for 3D point cloud data,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP '10), pp. 1271–1274, October 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Viejo, J. Garcia, M. Cazorla, D. Gil, and M. Johnsson, “Using GNG to improve 3D feature extraction: application to 6DoF egomotion,” Neural Networks, vol. 32, pp. 138–146, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Kohonen, Self-Organizing Maps, vol. 30 of Springer Series in Information Sciences, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. B. Fritzke, “A growing neural gas network learns topologies,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 7, pp. 625–632, MIT Press, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  14. T. Martinetz, “Competitive hebbian learning rule forms perfectly topology preserving maps,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN ’93), pp. 427–434, 1993.
  15. T. Martinetz and K. Schulten, “Topology representing networks,” Neural Networks, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 507–522, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. Xu, B. Mourrain, R. Duvigneau, and A. Galligo, “Analysis-suitable volume parameterization of multi-block computational domain in isogeometric applications,” Computer-Aided Design, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 395–404, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. S. Orts, J. Garcia-Rodriguez, D. Viejo, M. Cazorla, and V. Morell, “GPGPU implementation of growing neural gas: Application to 3D scene reconstruction,” Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 1361–1372, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. Tombari, S. Salti, and L. Di Stefano, “A combined texture-shape descriptor for enhanced 3D feature matching,” in Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '11), pp. 809–812, September 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Orts-Escolano, A Three-Dimensional Representation Method for Noisy Point Clouds Based on Growing Self-Organizing Maps Accelerated on GPUs, University of Alicante, 2014.
  20. R. B. Rusu, N. Blodow, Z. C. Marton, and M. Beetz, “Aligning point cloud views using persistent feature histograms,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 08), pp. 3384–3391, Nice, France, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. B. Rusu, N. Blodow, and M. Beetz, “Fast point feature histograms (FPFH) for 3D registration,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '09), pp. 3212–3217, Kobe, Japan, May 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. I. Sipiran and B. Bustos, “Harris 3D: a robust extension of the Harris operator for interest point detection on 3D meshes,” Visual Computer, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 963–976, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. B. Rusu and S. Cousins, “3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL),” in Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '11), pp. 1–4, Shanghai, China, May 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus