Research Article
Sample-Based Extreme Learning Machine with Missing Data
Table 3
Performance comparison of S-ELM and MF-ELM over different missing ratios on the fingerprint data set.
| Target class | Missing ratio | S-ELM | MF-ELM | Accuracy ± std. | Time (Sec.) | Accuracy ± std. | Time (Sec.) |
| Loop | 10% | 0.8256 ± 0.0736 | 89.37 | 0.7967 ± 0.0985 | 85.72 | 20% | 0.8029 ± 0.1253 | 85.91 | 0.7265 ± 0.1371 | 86.28 | 30% | 0.7694 ± 0.1191 | 90.43 | 0.6303 ± 0.1039 | 87.93 |
| Whorl | 10% | 0.8137 ± 0.0627 | 67.28 | 0.8129 ± 0.0922 | 60.72 | 20% | 0.7436 ± 0.0963 | 71.32 | 0.7269 ± 0.1167 | 67.49 | 30% | 0.7102 ± 0.0849 | 69.09 | 0.6359 ± 0.1076 | 68.25 |
| Arch | 10% | 0.8361 ± 0.0852 | 102.7 | 0.8057 ± 0.0937 | 94.73 | 20% | 0.7659 ± 0.0974 | 98.31 | 0.7561 ± 0.1170 | 96.83 | 30% | 0.7192 ± 0.0827 | 100.3 | 0.6574 ± 0.1207 | 96.67 |
|
|