Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 165136, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/165136
Research Article

A Topology Evolution Model Based on Revised PageRank Algorithm and Node Importance for Wireless Sensor Networks

1School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
2School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
3Guangxi Key Laboratory of Trusted Software, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
4College of Computer and Information Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received 25 November 2014; Revised 14 April 2015; Accepted 15 April 2015

Academic Editor: Elmetwally Elabbasy

Copyright © 2015 Xiaogang Qi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Srinivasan, S. Dattagupta, P. Kulkarni, and K. Ramamritham, “A survey of sensory data boundary estimation, covering and tracking techniques using collaborating sensors,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 358–375, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. Steven, “Exploring complex networks,” Nature, vol. 410, no. 6825, pp. 268–276, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. E. J. Newman and D. J. Watts, “Scaling and percolation in the small-world network model,” Physical Review E—Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 7332–7342, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, “Emergence of scaling in random networks,” Science, vol. 286, no. 5439, pp. 509–512, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, “Collective dynamics of small world networks,” Nature, vol. 393, no. 6684, pp. 440–442, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A.-L. Barabási, R. Albert, and H. Jeong, “Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 272, no. 1, pp. 173–187, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Wang, E. Liu, Z. Zhang, and R. Wang, “A flow-weighted scale-free topology for wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 235–238, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. G. Feng, T. Liu, Y. Wang et al., “AggregateRank: bringing order to websites,” in Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '06), pp. 75–82, ACM, Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
  9. H. Nakakubo, S. Nakajima, K. Hatano, J. Miyazaki, and S. Uemura, “Web pages scoring based on link analysis of web page sets,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA '07), pp. 269–273, Regensburg, Germany, September 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Cai, X. He, J.-R. Wen, and W.-Y. Ma, “Block-level link analysis,” in Proceeding of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 440–447, July 2004. View at Scopus
  11. S. N. Dorogovtsev and J. F. F. Mendes, “Scaling properties of scale-free evolving networks: continuous approach,” Physical Review E, vol. 63, no. 5, Article ID 056125, 21 pages, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. Sarshar and V. Roychowdhury, “Scale-free and stable structures in complex ad hoc networks,” Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 69, no. 2, Article ID 026101, pp. 1–6, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y.-J. Tan, J. Wu, and H.-Z. Deng, “Evaluation method for node importance based on node contraction in complex networks,” Systems Engineering—Theory and Practice, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 79–84, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus