Research Article

An Efficient Algorithm for Unconstrained Optimization

Table 3

Results with 3 and 6 particles.

ā€‰Function(Dim.) Part.Time (sec)Perc.Mean Iter.EOF

1 Ackley(10) 31.420.8455.61366.8
2 Ackley(120) 31.562.5385.51156.5
3 Ackley(2) 31.237.5379.21137.6
4 Bohachevsky 1(2) 30.8100236.9710.7
5 Bohachevsky 2(2) 30.8100241.8725.4
6 Bohachevsky 3(2) 30.8100247.5742.5
7 Branin(2)63.44.2484.42906.4
8 Colville(4) 31.64.24851455
9 CrossLegTable(2) (0.83) 30.875223.6670.8
10 Cross-in-Tray(2) 31.716.74601380
11 DevillierGlasser02(5) (0.00) 30.6100151.9455.7
12 Drop Wave(2) 31.2100142426
13 Easom(2) 31.58.3466.51399.5
14 Goldstein-Price(2) 31.64.24831449
15 Griewank(10) 30.310088.5265.5
16 Griewank(100) 30.410088.3264.9
17 Griewank(2) 30.7100209.5628.5
18 Griewank(30) 30.975193.7581.1
19 Griewank(6) 30.310088.2264.6
20 Hartmann(3) 31.84.2485.51456.5
21 Holder Table(2)62.64.2478.92873.4
22 Levy(12) 62.48.3475.52853
23 Levy(120) 62.912.5474.82848.8
24 Levy(2) 62.38.3465.32791.8
25 Levy13(2) 62.44.2484.32905.8
26 Matyas(2) 30.8100237.6712.8
27 Michalewicz(2) 3254.23671101
28 Powell(10)31.74.2497.31491.9
29 Powell(12) 30.695.8200.3600.9
30 Powell(120) 30.7100207.6622.8
31 Powell(2) 30.795.8261.5784.5
32 Rastrigin(10) 30.8100261.8785.4