Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 189282, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/189282
Research Article

A Novel Probabilistic Approach for Vehicle Position Prediction in Free, Partial, and Full GPS Outages

College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

Received 6 February 2015; Accepted 5 July 2015

Academic Editor: Mark Leeson

Copyright © 2015 Vincent Havyarimana et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Boucher and J.-C. Noyer, “A hybrid particle approach for gnss applications with partial gps outages,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 498–505, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. U. Iqbal, J. Georgy, W. F. Abdelfatah, M. J. Korenberg, and A. Noureldin, “Pseudoranges error correction in partial GPS outages for a nonlinear tightly coupled integrated system,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1510–1525, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. Boucher, A. Lahrech, and J.-C. Noyer, “Non-linear filtering for land vehicle navigation with GPS outage,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC '04), pp. 1321–1325, October 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. Kaplan and D. Hegarty, Understanding GPS: Principles and Applications, Artech House, Norwood, Mass, USA, 2005.
  5. E. Mok, G. Retscher, and C. Wen, “Initial test on the use of GPS and sensor data of modern smartphones for vehicle tracking in dense high rise environments,” in Proceedings of the Ubiquitous Positioning, Indoor Navigation, and Location Based Service (UPINLBS '12), October 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. S. Ali and N. El-Sheimy, “Integrated particle swarm optimization and Kalman filter for navigation applications,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS '10), pp. 577–583, Portland, Ore, USA, September 2010. View at Scopus
  7. L. Chen and J. Fang, “A hybrid prediction method for bridging GPS outages in high-precision POS application,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1656–1665, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Boukerche, H. A. B. F. Oliveira, E. F. Nakamura, and A. A. F. Loureiro, “Vehicular Ad Hoc networks: a new challenge for localization-based systems,” Computer Communications, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 2838–2849, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Almazan, L. M. Bergasa, J. J. Yebes, R. Barea, and R. Arroyo, “Full auto-calibration of a smartphone on board a vehicle using IMU and GPS embedded sensors,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV '13), pp. 1374–1380, Gold Coast, Australia, June 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Xue, H. Zhu, Z. Hu, J. Yu, Y. Zhu, and G. Zhang, “SmartCut: mitigating 3G radio tail effect on smartphones,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 169–179, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. Bauer, “On the (in-)accuracy of GPS measures of smartphones: a study of running tracking applications,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia (MoMM '13), pp. 335–340, December 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Bhatt, P. Aggarwal, V. Devabhaktuni, and P. Bhattacharya, “A novel hybrid fusion algorithm to bridge the period of GPS outages using low-cost INS,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 2166–2173, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Noureldin, A. El-Shafie, and M. Bayoumi, “GPS/INS integration utilizing dynamic neural networks for vehicular navigation,” Information Fusion, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 48–57, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Quinonero-Candela and E. Carl Rasmussen, “A unifying view of sparse approximate Gaussian process regression,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 6, pp. 1939–1959, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. C.-P. Pang and Z.-Z. Liu, “Bridging GPS outages of tightly coupled GPS/SINS based on the adaptive track fusion using RBF neural network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE '09), pp. 971–976, IEEE, Seoul, Republic of Korea, July 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. V. B. S. Srilatha Indira Dutt, G. Sasi Bhushana Rao, S. Rani, S. R. Babu, P. Goswami, and C. U. Kumari, “Investigation of GDOP for precise user position computation with all satellites in view and optimum four satellite configurations,” Journal of Indian Geophysical Union, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 139–148, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. Chen, L. Cheng, and M. G. Gan, “Extension of SGMF using Gaussian sum approximation for nonlinear/non-Gaussian model and its application in multipath estimation,” Acta Automatica Sinica, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. H. R. Mohseni, M. L. Kringelbach, M. W. Woolrich, A. Baker, T. Z. Aziz, and P. Probert-Smith, “Non-gaussian probabilistic MEG source localisation based on kernel density estimation,” NeuroImage, vol. 87, pp. 444–464, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. M. Tillmann and M. E. Pfetsch, “The computational complexity of the restricted isometry property, the nullspace property, and related concepts in compressed sensing,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 1248–1261, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. W. Wang, M. J. Wainwright, and K. Ramchandran, “Information-theoretic limits on sparse signal recovery: dense versus sparse measurement matrices,” Tech. Rep., Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  21. R. Baraniuk, M. Davenport, R. DeVore, and M. Wakin, “A simple proof of the restricted isometry property for random matrices,” Constructive Approximation, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 253–263, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. J. Bourgain, S. Dilworth, K. Ford, S. Konyagin, and D. Kutzarova, “Explicit constructions of RIP matrices and related problems,” Duke Mathematical Journal, vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 145–185, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. J. Haupt, L. Applebaum, and R. Nowak, “On the restricted isometry of deterministically subsampled Fourier matrices,” in Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS '10), Princeton, NJ, USA, March 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Foucart and H. Rauhut, A Mathematical Introduction to Compressive Sensing, Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis, Springer, Berline, Germany, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. Z. Zhang, “Bayesian growth curve models with the generalized error distribution,” Journal of Applied Statistics, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1779–1795, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  26. C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  27. L. Boccato, R. Krummenauer, R. Attux, and A. Lopes, “Application of natural computing algorithms to maximum likelihood estimation of direction of arrival,” Signal Processing, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1338–1352, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Thomaidis, M. Tsogas, P. Lytrivis, G. Karaseitanidis, and A. Amditis, “Multiple hypothesis tracking for data association in vehicular networks,” Information Fusion, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 374–383, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Majumdar and R. K. Ward, “Non-convex compressed sensing from noisy measurements,” Open Signal Processing Journal, vol. 2, pp. 40–44, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  30. E. J. Candès, “The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing,” Comptes Rendus Mathematique, vol. 346, no. 9-10, pp. 589–592, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. D. L. Martinez, D. T. Shih, V. C. P. Chen, and S. B. Kim, “A convex version of multivariate adaptive regression splines,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, vol. 81, pp. 89–106, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Murata, J. Namikawa, H. Arie, S. Sugano, and J. Tani, “Learning to reproduce fluctuating time series by inferring their time-dependent stochastic properties: application in Robot learning via tutoring,” IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 298–310, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. Jin, W. Chen, and T. W. Simpson, “Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Kayri, “The Analysis of internet addiction scale using multivariate adaptive regression splines,” Iranian Journal of Public Health, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 51–63, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. K. Loo, I. Tong, and B. Kao, “Online algorithms for mining inter-stream associations from large sensor networks,” in Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, vol. 3518, pp. 143–149, Springer, 2005. View at Google Scholar