Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 260205, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/260205
Research Article

Supplier Selection and Production Planning by Using Guided Genetic Algorithm and Dynamic Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II Approaches

Department of Industrial Engineering & Management, National Taipei University of Technology, No. 1, Section 3, Chung-Hsiao E. Road, Taipei 10608, Taiwan

Received 23 February 2015; Accepted 11 June 2015

Academic Editor: Mingshu Peng

Copyright © 2015 H. S. Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. C. Tan, “Supply chain management: practices, concerns, and performance issues,” The Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 42–53, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. A. Zouggari, L. Benyoucef, and Simulation based fuzzy TOPSIS approach for group multi-criteria supplier selection problem, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 507–519, 2012.
  3. S. M. J. M. Al-e-Hashem, H. Malekly, and M. B. Aryanezhad, “A multi-objective robust optimization model for multi-product multi-site aggregate production planning in a supply chain under uncertainty,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 28–42, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. F. F. Rashid, W. Hutabarat, and A. Tiwari, “A review on assembly sequence planning and assembly line balancing optimisation using soft computing approaches,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 59, no. 1–4, pp. 335–349, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C.-C. Chang, H.-E. Tseng, and L.-P. Meng, “Artificial immune systems for assembly sequence planning exploration,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1218–1232, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. Chutima and P. Chimklai, “Multi-objective two-sided mixed-model assembly line balancing using particle swarm optimisation with negative knowledge,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 39–55, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H.-E. Tseng, “Guided genetic algorithms for solving a larger constraint assembly problem,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 601–625, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. Luo, J. Zheng, J. Xie, and J. Wu, “Dynamic crowding distance—a new diversity maintenance strategy for MOEAs,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Natural Computation (ICNC '08), pp. 580–585, October 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. V. Wadhwa and A. R. Ravindran, “Vendor selection in outsourcing,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 3725–3737, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Sawik, “Single vs. multiple objective supplier selection in a make to order environment,” Omega, vol. 38, no. 3-4, pp. 203–212, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Z. Liao and J. Rittscher, “A multi-objective supplier selection model under stochastic demand conditions,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 150–159, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. A. Weber, J. R. Current, and W. C. Benton, “Vendor selection criteria and methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 2–18, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Q. Su, “A hierarchical approach on assembly sequence planning and optimal sequences analyzing,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 224–234, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. S. Wang, Z. H. Che, and C. J. Chiang, “A hybrid genetic algorithm for multi-objective product plan selection problem with ASP and ALB,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 5440–5450, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Topaloglu, L. Salum, and A. A. Supciller, “Rule-based modeling and constraint programming based solution of the assembly line balancing problem,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 3484–3493, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. N. Sotskov, A. Dolgui, and M.-C. Portmann, “Stability analysis of an optimal balance for an assembly line with fixed cycle time,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 783–797, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  18. E. Erel and S. C. Sarin, “A survey of the assembly line balancing procedures,” Production Planning & Control, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 414–434, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Becker and A. Scholl, “A survey on problems and methods in generalized assembly line balancing,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 694–715, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. Dini, F. Failli, B. Lazzerini, and F. Marcelloni, “Generation of optimized assembly sequences using genetic algorithms,” CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 17–20, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. M. Marian, L. H. S. Luong, and K. Abhary, “A genetic algorithm for the optimisation of assembly sequences,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 503–527, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. S. Hong and H. S. Cho, “Generation of robotic assembly sequences using a simulated annealing,” Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 1247–1252, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  23. H. Shan, S. Li, D. Gong, and P. Lou, “Genetic simulated annealing algorithm-based assembly sequence planning,” in Proceedings of the International Technology and Innovation Conference (ITIC '06), pp. 1573–1579, Hangzhou, China, November 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. W.-C. Chen, P.-H. Tai, W.-J. Deng, and L.-F. Hsieh, “A three-stage integrated approach for assembly sequence planning using neural networks,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1777–1786, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Wang and J. H. Liu, “Chaotic particle swarm optimization for assembly sequence planning,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 212–222, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. D. Schaffer, “Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 93–100, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, July 1985.
  27. P. Hajela and C.-Y. Lin, “Genetic search strategies in multicriterion optimal design,” Structural Optimization, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 99–107, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. N. Srinivas and K. Deb, “Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 221–248, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  29. Y.-K. Lin and C.-T. Yeh, “Multi-objective optimization for stochastic computer networks using NSGA-II and TOPSIS,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 218, no. 3, pp. 735–746, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. Rezaei and M. Davoodi, “Multi-objective models for lot-sizing with supplier selection,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 77–86, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. P. K. Tripathi, S. Bandyopadhyay, and S. K. Pal, “Multi-objective particle swarm optimization with time variant inertia and acceleration coefficients,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 22, pp. 5033–5049, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. X. Li, “A non-dominated sorting particle swarm optimizer for multiobjective optimization,” in Genetic and Evolutionary Computation—GECCO 2003, vol. 2723 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 37–48, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. I. Rojas, J. González, H. Pomares, J. J. Merelo, P. A. Castillo, and G. Romero, “Statistical analysis of the main parameters involved in the design of a genetic algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S.-J. Tsai, T.-Y. Sun, C.-C. Liu, S.-T. Hsieh, W.-C. Wu, and S.-Y. Chiu, “An improved multi-objective particle swarm optimizer for multi-objective problems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 5872–5886, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. A. van Veldhuizen and G. B. Lamount, “Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm test suites,” in Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC '99), pp. 351–357, ACM, San Antonio, Tex, USA, February-March 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar