Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 309525, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/309525
Research Article

Estimation of Oceanic Eddy Viscosity Profile and Wind Stress Drag Coefficient Using Adjoint Method

1Laboratory of Physical Oceanography, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
2State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, SOA, Hangzhou 310012, China

Received 8 March 2015; Revised 29 May 2015; Accepted 15 June 2015

Academic Editor: Carla Faraci

Copyright © 2015 Qilin Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Bergthórsson and B. R. Döös, “Numerical weather map analysis,” Tellus, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 329–340, 1955. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. A. Eliassen, “Provisional report on calculation of spatial covariance and autocorrelation of the pressure field,” in Dynamic Meteorology: Data Assimilation Methods, pp. 319–330, Springer, 1954. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. M. Bratseth, “Statistical interpolation by means of successive corrections,” Tellus, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 439–447, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. E. Kalman, “A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems,” Journal of Basic Engineering, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 34–45, 1960. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. G. Evensen, “Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Montre Carlo methods to forecast error statistics,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 143–162, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  6. O. M. Smedstad and J. J. O'Brien, “Variational data assimilation and parameter estimation in an equatorial Pacific ocean model,” Progress in Oceanography, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 179–241, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. I. M. Navon, “Practical and theoretical aspects of adjoint parameter estimation and identifiability in meteorology and oceanography,” Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, vol. 27, no. 1–4, pp. 55–79, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F.-X. Le Dimet and O. Talagrand, “Variational algorithms for analysis and assimilation of meteorological observations: theoretical aspects,” Tellus, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 97–110, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. W. Book, P. J. Martin, I. Janeković, M. Kuzmić, and M. Wimbush, “Vertical structure of bottom Ekman tidal flows: observations, theory, and modeling from the northern Adriatic,” Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans, vol. 114, no. 7, pp. 1–23, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. C. Zhang and X. Q. Lu, “Inversion of three-dimensional tidal currents in marginal seas by assimilating satellite altimetry,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 199, no. 49–52, pp. 3125–3136, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. H. Roquet and S. Planton, “Determination of ocean heat fluxes by a variational method,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 98, pp. 10211–10221, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Yu and J. J. O'Brien, “Variational estimation of the wind stress drag coefficient and the oceanic eddy viscosity profile,” Journal of Physical Oceanography, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 709–719, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  13. R. W. Lardner, A. H. Al-Rabeh, and N. Gunay, “Optimal estimation of parameters for a two-dimensional hydro-dynamical model of the Arabian Gulf,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 98, no. 10, pp. 18229–18242, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. B. Chen, C. B. Miao, and X. Q. Lv, “A three-dimensional numerical internal tidal model involving adjoint method,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 1584–1613, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. A. Z. Cao, H. B. Chen, J. C. Zhang, and X. Q. Lv, “Optimization of open boundary conditions in a 3D internal tidal model with the adjoint method around Hawaii,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 950926, 11 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. U. Seiler, “Estimation of open boundary conditions with the adjoint method,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 22855–22870, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Yu and J. J. O'Brien, “On the initial condition in parameter estimation,” Journal of Physical Oceanography, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1361–1364, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. S.-Q. Peng and L. Xie, “Effect of determining initial conditions by four-dimensional variational data assimilation on storm surge forecasting,” Ocean Modelling, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 1–18, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S.-Q. Peng, L. Xie, and L. J. Pietrafesa, “Correcting the errors in the initial conditions and wind stress in storm surge simulation using an adjoint optimal technique,” Ocean Modelling, vol. 18, no. 3-4, pp. 175–193, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. J. Lentz, “Sensitivity of the inner-shelf circulation to the form of the eddy viscosity profile,” Journal of Physical Oceanography, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. Pohlmann, “Calculating the annual cycle of the vertical eddy viscosity in the North Sea with a three-dimensional baroclinic shelf sea circulation model,” Continental Shelf Research, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 147–161, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. W. Tian, Q. X. Yang, and W. Zhao, “Enhanced diapycnal mixing in the South China Sea,” Journal of Physical Oceanography, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 3191–3203, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2006. View at MathSciNet
  24. J. Zou, W. W. Hsieh, and I. M. Navon, “Sequential open-boundary control by data assimilation in a limited-area model,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 123, no. 9, pp. 2899–2909, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  25. D. L. T. Anderson, J. Sheinbaum, and K. Haines, “Data assimilation in ocean models,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 1209–1266, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. S. Yu and J. J. O'Brien, “On the initial condition in parameter estimation,” Journal of Physical Oceanography, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1361–1364, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. G. M. Zhou, “A descent algorithm without line search for unconstrained optimization,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 215, no. 7, pp. 2528–2533, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. R. Fletcher and C. M. Reeves, “Function minimization by conjugate gradients,” The Computer Journal, vol. 7, pp. 149–154, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  29. A. N. Tikhonov, “Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method,” Soviet Mathematical Doklady, vol. 4, pp. 1035–1038, 1963, English translation of Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol. 151, pp. 501–504, 1963. View at Google Scholar
  30. D. Terzopoulos, “Regularization of inverse visual problems involving discontinuities,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 413–424, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus