Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 313249, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/313249
Research Article

Modeling Stochastic Route Choice Behaviors with Equivalent Impedance

Research Centre of Intelligent Transportation Systems, School of Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received 14 December 2014; Accepted 7 June 2015

Academic Editor: Wei (David) Fan

Copyright © 2015 Jun Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Fisk, “Some developments in equilibrium traffic assignment,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 243–255, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. R. B. Dial, “A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment model which obviates path enumeration,” Transportation Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 83–111, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Sheffi, Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1985.
  4. S. Bekhor and T. Toledo, “Investigating path-based solution algorithms to the stochastic user equilibrium problem,” Transportation Research, Part B: Methodological, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 279–295, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Akamatsu, “Cyclic flows, Markov process and stochastic traffic assignment,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 369–386, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. G. H. Bell, “Alternatives to Dial's logit assignment algorithm,” Transportation Research Part B, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 287–295, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Akamatsu, “Decomposition of path choice entropy in general transport networks,” Transportation Science, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 349–362, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  8. J. Li, S. Xin, and C. Liu, “An algorithm for logit network loading problem by topological sorting,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies (EASTS '05), pp. 1209–1217, Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Bangkok, Thailand, 2005.
  9. H. Huang and M. G. H. Bell, “A study on logit assignment which excludes all cyclic flows,” Transportation Research B, vol. 29, pp. 401–412, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  10. E. Cascetta, A. Nuzzolo, F. Russo, and A. Vitetta, “A modified logit route choice model overcoming route overlapping problems: specification and some calibration results for interurban networks,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Lyon, France, 1996.
  11. M. E. Ben-Akiva and M. Bierlaire, “Discrete choice methods and their applications to short term travel decisions,” in Handbook of Transportation Science, pp. 5–33, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  12. E. Frejinger and M. Bierlaire, “Capturing correlation with subnetworks in route choice models,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 363–378, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. H. L. Bovy, S. Bekhor, and C. G. Prato, “The path size factor revisited: an alternative derivation,” in Proceedings of the 87th Transportation Research, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
  14. M. C. J. Bliemer and P. H. L. Bovy, “Impact of route choice set on route choice probabilities,” Transportation Research Record, no. 2076, pp. 10–19, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. G. Prato and S. Bekhor, “Modeling route choice behavior: how relevant is the composition of choice set?” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2003, pp. 64–73, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. Vovsha and S. Bekhor, “Link-nested logit model of route choice: overcoming route overlapping problem,” Transportation Research Record, no. 1645, pp. 133–142, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Bekhor and J. N. Prashker, “Stochastic user equilibrium formulation for generalized nested logit model,” Transportation Research Record, no. 1752, pp. 84–90, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. S. Ramming, Network Knowledge and Route Choice, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2002.
  19. A. Papola, “Some developments on the cross-nested logit model,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 833–851, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. Abbe, M. Bierlaire, and T. Toledo, “Normalization and correlation of cross-nested logit models,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 795–808, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Chu, “A paired combinatorial logit model for travel demand analysis,” in Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Transportation Research, Ventura, Calif, USA, July 1989.
  22. F. S. Koppelman and C.-H. Wen, “The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 75–89, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Chen, S. Pravinvongvuth, X. Xu, S. Ryu, and P. Chootinan, “Examining the scaling effect and overlapping problem in logit-based stochastic user equilibrium models,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1343–1358, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. P. Gliebe, “Route choice using a paired combinatorial Logit model,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
  25. J. N. Prashker and S. Bekhor, “Route choice models used in the stochastic user equilibrium problem: a review,” Transport Reviews, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 437–463, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Bekhor, M. E. Ben-Akiva, and M. S. Ramming, “Adaptation of logit kernel to route choice situation,” Transportation Research Record, no. 1805, pp. 78–85, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. McFadden and K. Train, “Mixed MNL models for discrete response,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 447–470, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Walker, Extended Discrete Choice Models: Integrated Framework, Flexible Error Structures, and Latent Variables, MIT, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2001.
  29. C. Daganzo, Multinomial Probit: The Theory and Its Application to Demand Forecasting, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1979. View at MathSciNet
  30. D. Bolduc and M. Ben-Akiva, “A multinomial probit formulation for large choice sets,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Travel Behaviour, 1991.
  31. T. Yai, S. Iwakura, and S. Morichi, “Multinomial probit with structured covariance for route choice behavior,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 195–207, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Pravinvongvuth and A. Chen, “Adaptation of the paired combinatorial logit model to the route choice problem,” Transportmetrica, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 223–240, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. T. Miwa, Y. Okada, and T. Morikawa, “Applying a structured dispersion parameter to multiclass stochastic user equilibrium assignment model,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2196, pp. 142–149, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. X.-J. Lai, Z. Yu, and J. Li, “Derivation, implementation and examination of Logit route choice model with relative impedance,” Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 85–90, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Han, “Dynamic traffic modelling and dynamic stochastic user equilibrium assignment for general road networks,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 225–249, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Y. Lim and B. Heydecker, “Dynamic departure time and stochastic user equilibrium assignment,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 97–118, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. F. Daganzo and Y. Sheffi, “On stochastic models of traffic assignment,” Transportation Science, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 253–274, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. E. Cascetta, A. Nuzzolo, F. Russo, and A. Vitetta, “A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems: specification and some calibration results for interurban networks,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Lyon, France, July 1996.