Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 348178, 21 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/348178
Research Article

Embedded Optimal Control of Robot Manipulators with Passive Joints

School of Communication Engineering, Rey Juan Carlos University, Fuenlabrada, 28943 Madrid, Spain

Received 12 March 2015; Accepted 19 August 2015

Academic Editor: Sivaguru Ravindran

Copyright © 2015 Alberto Olivares and Ernesto Staffetti. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. De Luca, S. Iannitti, R. Mattone, and G. Oriolo, “Underactuated manipulators: control properties and techniques,” Machine Intelligence and Robotic Control, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 113–125, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  2. K. M. Lynch, A. M. Bloch, S. V. Drakunov, M. Reyhanoglu, and D. Zenkov, “Control of nonholonomic and underactuated systems,” in The Control Handbook: Advanced Methods, W. S. Levine, Ed., chapter 42, pp. 42-1–42-36, CRC Press, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  3. T. Stachowiak and T. Okada, “A numerical analysis of chaos in the double pendulum,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 417–422, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. X. Xin and Y. Liu, Control Design and Analysis for Underactuated Robotic Systems, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2014.
  5. J. Gregory, A. Olivares, and E. Staffetti, “Energy-optimal trajectory planning for the Pendubot and the Acrobot,” Optimal Control Applications & Methods, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 275–295, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. J. Lunze and F. Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue, Eds., Handbook of Hybrid Systems Control, Cambridge University Press, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. S. Sager, Numerical methods for mixed-integer optimal control problems [Ph.D. thesis], Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, 2006.
  8. S. Sager, “Reformulations and algorithms for the optimization of switching decisions in nonlinear optimal control,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1238–1247, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Buss, O. von Stryk, R. Bulirsch, and G. Schmidt, “Towards hybrid optimal control,” AT-Automatisierungstechnik, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 448–459, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Zhang and T.-J. Tarn, “Hybrid control of the Pendubot,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 79–86, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. S. Lemch and P. E. Caines, “Hierarchical hybrid systems: partition deformations and applications to the acrobot system,” in Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, T. Henzinger and S. Sastry, Eds., vol. 1386 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 237–252, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. C. Bengea and R. A. DeCarlo, “Optimal control of switching systems,” Automatica, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 11–27, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. S. Wei, K. Uthaichana, M. Žefran, R. A. DeCarlo, and S. Bengea, “Applications of numerical optimal control to nonlinear hybrid systems,” Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 264–279, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. R. T. Meyer, M. Žefran, and R. A. DeCarlo, “A comparison of the embedding method with multiparametric programming, mixed-integer programming, gradient-descent, and hybrid minimum principle-based methods,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1784–1800, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Bengea, K. Uthaichana, M. Zéfran, and R. A. DeCarlo, “Optimal control of switching systems via embedding into continuous optimal control problem,” in The Control Handbook: Advanced Methods, W. S. Levine, Ed., chapter 31, pp. 1–23, CRC Press, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Line, M. C. Manzie, and M. C. Good, “Electromechanical brake modeling and control: from PI to MPC,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 446–457, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Makkar, W. E. Dixon, W. G. Sawyer, and G. Hu, “A new continuously differentiable friction model for control systems design,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM '05), pp. 600–605, IEEE, July 2005. View at Scopus
  18. G. Oriolo and Y. Nakamura, “Control of mechanical systems with second-order nonholonomic constraints: underactuated manipulators,” in Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 3, pp. 2398–2403, IEEE, Brighton, UK, December 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. F. Bullo and A. D. Lewis, “Low-order controllability and kinematic reductions for affine connection control systems,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 885–908, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. F. Bullo, A. D. Lewis, and K. M. Lynch, “Controllable kinematic reductions for mechanical systems: concepts, computational tools,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, August 2002.
  21. F. Bullo and K. M. Lynch, “Kinematic controllability for decoupled trajectory planning in underactuated mechanical systems,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 402–412, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. R. Hargraves and S. W. Paris, “Direct trajectory optimization using nonlinear programming and collocation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 338–342, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. Bonami, A. Olivares, and E. Staffetti, “Energy-optimal multi-goal motion planning for planar robot manipulators,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 80–104, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  24. A. Wächter and L. T. Biegler, “On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 25–57, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. P. Bonami, L. T. Biegler, A. R. Conn et al., “An algorithmic framework for convex mixed integer nonlinear programs,” Discrete Optimization, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 186–204, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus