Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 472917, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/472917
Research Article

A Novel Adaptive Conditional Probability-Based Predicting Model for User’s Personality Traits

Mengmeng Wang,1,2 Wanli Zuo,1,2 and Ying Wang1,2,3

1College of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
2Key Laboratory of Symbolic Computation and Knowledge Engineering, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
3College of Mathematics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

Received 13 March 2015; Accepted 21 June 2015

Academic Editor: Antonino Laudani

Copyright © 2015 Mengmeng Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Oussalah, F. Bhat, K. Challis, and T. Schnier, “A software architecture for Twitter collection, search and geolocation services,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 37, pp. 105–120, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. R. McCrae and P. T. Costa, “Validation of the 5-factor model of personality across instruments and observers,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Saucier and L. R. Goldberg, “The structure of personality attributes,” in Personality and Work: Reconsidering the Role of Personality in Organizations, M. R. Barrick and A. M. Ryan, Eds., pp. 1–29, Jossey-Bass, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  4. B. Caci, M. Cardaci, M. E. Tabacchi, and F. Scrima, “Personality variables as predictors of facebook usage,” Psychological Reports, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 528–539, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Kosinski, Y. Bachrach, P. Kohli, D. Stillwell, and T. Graepel, “Manifestations of user personality in website choice and behaviour on online social networks,” Machine Learning, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 357–380, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. M.-G. Cojocaru, H. Thille, E. Thommes, D. Nelson, and S. Greenhalgh, “Social influence and dynamic demand for new products,” Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 50, pp. 169–185, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. Durupinar, N. Pelechano, J. Allbeck, U. Gudukbay, and N. Badler, “The impact of the OCEAN personality model on the perception of crowds,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 22–31, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  8. X. Feng, “Study on customer personality characteristics and relationship outcomes using SEM analysis,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechatronics and Information Technology, pp. 841–844, 2013.
  9. J. G. Lee, S. Moon, and K. Salamatian, “Modeling and predicting the popularity of online contents with Cox proportional hazard regression model,” Neurocomputing, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 134–145, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. W. Stoughton, L. F. Thompson, and A. W. Meade, “Big five personality traits reflected in job applicants' social media postings,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 800–805, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. A. Cobb-Clark and S. Schurer, “The stability of big-five personality traits,” Economics Letters, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. Mischel, “Toward an integrative science of the person,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 55, pp. 1–22, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Argamon, S. Dhawle, M. Koppel, and J. Pennebaker, “Lexical predictors 19 of personality type,” in Proceedings of the Joint Annual Meeting of the Interface and the Classification Society of North America, 2005.
  14. F. Mairesse, M. A. Walker, M. R. Mehl, and R. K. Moore, “Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 30, pp. 457–500, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Moore and J. C. McElroy, “The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 267–274, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. W. Pennebaker and L. A. King, “Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1296–1312, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Han and M. Kamber, Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems, edited by J. Gray, Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, Mass, USA, 3rd edition, 2011.
  18. J. Golbeck, C. Robles, and K. Turner, “Predicting personality with social media,” in Proceedings of the 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), pp. 253–262, ACM, May 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. R. Quinlan, “Learning with continuous classes,” in Proceedings of the 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Ai '92), pp. 343–348, Hobart, Australia, November 1992.
  20. S. Roweis and Z. Ghahramani, “A unifying review of linear gaussian models,” Neural Computation, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 305–345, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Bai, T. Zhu, and L. Cheng, “Big-five personality prediction based on user behaviors at social network sites,” http://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.4809v1.pdf.
  22. J. Oberlander and S. Nowson, “Whose thumb is it anyway? classifying author personality from weblog text,” in Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 627–634, 2006.
  23. T. Nguyen, D. Q. Phung, B. Adams, and S. Venkatesh, “Towards discovery of influence and personality traits through social link prediction,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 566–569, Barcelona, Spain, July 2011.
  24. S. T. Bai, B. B. Hao, A. Li, S. Yuan, R. Gao, and T. S. Zhu, “Predicting big five personality traits of microblog users,” in Proceedings of the 12th IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technolog (WI '13), pp. 501–508, November 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Sun and N. Wilson, “A model of personality should be a cognitive architecture itself,” Cognitive Systems Research, vol. 29-30, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Ortigosa, R. M. Carro, and J. I. Quiroga, “Predicting user personality by mining social interactions in Facebook,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 57–71, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. O. P. John, L. P. Naumann, and C. J. Soto, “Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and conceptualissues,” in Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, O. P. John, R. W. Robins, and L. A. Pervin, Eds., pp. 114–158, Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  28. G. Park, H. A. Schwartz, J. C. Eichstaedt et al., “Automatic personality assessment through social media language,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 934–952, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. C. J. Soto, O. P. John, S. D. Gosling, and J. Potter, “Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: big five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 330–348, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. J. Soto and O. P. John, “Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity,” Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 84–90, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. V. Kosti, R. Feldt, and L. Angelis, “Personality, emotional intelligence and work preferences in software engineering: an empirical study,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 973–990, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. A. Schwartz, J. C. Eichstaedt, M. L. Kern et al., “Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: the open-vocabulary approach,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 9, Article ID e73791, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. Farnadi, S. Zoghbi, M. F. Moens, and M. D. Cock, “Recognising personality traits using facebook status updates,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Personality Recognition, July 2013, http://clic.cimec.unitn.it/fabio/wcpr13/farnadi_wcpr13.pdf.
  34. G. Tsoumakas and I. Katakis, “Multi-label classification: an overview,” International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Kosinski, D. Stillwell, and T. Graepel, “Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 15, pp. 5802–5805, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Belkin and P. Niyogi, “Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation,” Neural Computation, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1373–1396, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  37. R. Socher, J. Bauer, C. D. Manning, and Y. N. Andrew, “Parsing with compositional vector grammars,” in Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL '13), pp. 455–465, Sofia, Bulgaria, August 2013.
  38. K. Kazama, M. Imada, and K. Kashiwagi, “Characteristics of information diffusion in blogs, in relation to information source type,” Neurocomputing, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 84–92, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. B. David, Y. N. Andrew, and I. J. Michael, “Latent Dirichlet allocation,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 3, no. 4-5, pp. 993–1022, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. P. T. Costa and R. R. McCrae, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional Manual, Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.
  41. R. L. Atkinson, C. A. Richard, E. S. Edward, J. B. Daryl, and S. Nolen-Hoeksema, Hilgard's Introduction to Psychology, Harcourt College Publishers, Orlando, Fla, USA, 13th edition, 2000.
  42. B. Verhoeven, W. Daelemans, and T. D. Smedt, “Ensemble methods for personality recognition,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Personality Recognition, pp. 35–38, Boston, Mass, USA, July 2013.
  43. F. Alam, A. Stepanov, and G. Riccardi, “Personality traits recognition on social network—facebook,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Personality Recognition, pp. 6–9, Boston, Mass, USA, July 2013.
  44. M. T. Tomlinson, D. Hinote, and D. B. Bracewell, “Predicting conscientiousness through semantic analysis of facebook posts,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Personality Recognition, pp. 31–34, July 2013. View at Scopus
  45. D. M. Endres and J. E. Schindelin, “A new metric for probability distributions,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1858–1860, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  46. S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler, “On information and sufficiency,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 79–86, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  47. A. Genkin, D. D. Lewis, and D. Madigan, “Large-scale Bayesian logistic regression for text categorization,” Technometrics, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 291–304, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  48. A. K. McCallum and K. Nigam, “A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification,” in Proceedings of the AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, pp. 137–142, Madison, Wis, USA, July 1998.
  49. I. Ruczinski, C. Kooperberg, and M. LeBlanc, “Logic regression,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 475–511, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus