Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 484615, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/484615
Research Article

Structural Response Analysis under Dependent Variables Based on Probability Boxes

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

Received 29 October 2014; Revised 16 March 2015; Accepted 7 April 2015

Academic Editor: Alessandro Palmeri

Copyright © 2015 Z. Xiao and G. Yang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. E. Moore, Methods and Applications of Interval Analysis, SAIM Publisher, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1979.
  2. R. R. Yager, J. Kacprzyk, and M. Fedrizzi, Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  3. K. Sentz and S. Ferson, “Combination of evidence in Dempster-Shafer theory,” SAND 2002-0835, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Beer, S. Ferson, and V. Kreinovich, “Imprecise probabilities in engineering analyses,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 37, no. 1-2, pp. 4–29, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. M. Aughenbaugh and C. J. J. Paredis, “The value of using imprecise probabilities in engineering design,” Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 969–979, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. C. Williamson and T. Downs, “Probabilistic arithmetic. I. Numerical methods for calculating convolutions and dependency bounds,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 89–158, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. D. R. Karanki, H. S. Kushwaha, A. K. Verma, and S. Ajit, “Uncertainty analysis based on probability bounds (P-Box) approach in probabilistic safety assessment,” Risk Analysis, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 662–675, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. C. Bruns, Propagation of imprecise probabilities through black box models [M.S. thesis], Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga, USA, 2006.
  9. H. Zhang, R. L. Mullen, and R. L. Muhanna, “Interval Monte Carlo methods for structural reliability,” Structural Safety, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 183–190, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Zhang, R. L. Mullen, and R. L. Muhanna, “Finite element structural analysis using imprecise probabilities based on p-box representation,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Reliable Engineering Computing ‘Robust Design-Coping with Hazards, Risk and Uncertainty’, pp. 3–5, National University of Singapore, Singapore, March 2010.
  11. H. Zhang, R. L. Mullen, and R. L. Muhanna, “Structural analysis with probability-boxes,” International Journal of Reliability and Safety, vol. 6, no. 1–3, pp. 110–129, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. C. Bai, C. Jiang, X. Han, and D. A. Hu, “Evidence-theory-based structural static and dynamic response analysis under epistemic uncertainties,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, vol. 68, pp. 52–62, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. D. D. Ghosh and A. Olewnik, “Computationally efficient imprecise uncertainty propagation,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 135, no. 5, Article ID 051002, 12 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. W. E. Vesely, F. F. Goldberg, N. H. Roberts, and D. F. Hassl, Fault Tree Handbook, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 1987.
  15. J. W. Hickman, “PRA procedures guide: a guide to the performance of probabilistic risk assessments for nuclear power plants, in two volumes,” NUREGCR-2300-V1 and-V2, National Technical Information Service, Washington, DC, USA, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  16. K. Hanson and F. Hemez, “Uncertainty quantification of simulation codes based on experimental data,” in Proceedings of the 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2003.
  17. S. Ferson, R. B. Nelsen, J. Hajagos et al., “Dependence in probabilistic modeling, Dempster-Shafer theory, and probability bounds analysis,” SAND 2004-3072, Sandia National Laboratories, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  18. R. B. Nelsen, An Introduction to Copulas, vol. 139 of Lecture Notes in Statistics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. U. Cherubini, E. Luciano, and W. Vecchiato, Copula Methods in Finance, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. D. Moens and M. Hanss, “Non-probabilistic finite element analysis for parametric uncertainty treatment in applied mechanics: recent advances,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 4–16, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. D. Buhmann, Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations, vol. 12 of Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. W. Gander and W. Gautschi, “Adaptive quadrature—revisited,” BIT Numerical Mathematics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 84–101, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. P. Yi, G. Cheng, and L. Jiang, “A sequential approximate programming strategy for performance-measure-based probabilistic structural design optimization,” Structural Safety, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 91–109, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. Jiang, X. Han, and G. R. Liu, “Optimization of structures with uncertain constraints based on convex model and satisfaction degree of interval,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 196, no. 49–52, pp. 4791–4800, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. L. Martineau, M. B. Prime, and T. Duffey, “Penetration of HSLA-100 steel with tungsten carbide spheres at striking velocities between 0.8 and 2.5 km/s,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 505–520, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. M. Hanson and F. M. Hemez, “Uncertainty quantification of simulation codes based on experimental data,” in Proceedings of the 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 2003. View at Scopus