Research Article
Hierarchical Recognition System for Target Recognition from Sparse Representations
Table 3
The recognition rates obtained by different methods.
| | Methods | BMP2 | BTR70 | T72 | Average |
| | PCA + SVM | 88.42% | 94.39% | 92.96% | 91.21% | | LDA + SVM | 79.56% | 96.94% | 85.91% | 84.76% | | NMF + SVM | 90.12% | 99.49% | 93.81% | 93.04% | | DBN (RBM) | 86.88% | 99.49% | 96.74% | 92.89% | | DBN (SRBM) | 86.88% | 99.49% | 97.08% | 93.04% | | DBN (-RBM) | 87.05% | 99.49% | 97.25% | 93.19% | | DBN (-RBM) | 87.05% | 99.49% | 97.08% | 93.11% | | DBN (-RBM) | 89.78% | 99.49% | 97.60% | 94.51% | | HRS (RBM) | 89.61% | 99.49% | 97.60% | 94.43% | | HRS (SRBM) | 89.95% | 99.49% | 98.11% | 94.73% | | HRS (-RBM) | 90.12% | 100% | 98.45% | 95.09% | | HRS (-RBM) | 90.12% | 99.49% | 98.28% | 94.95% | | HRS (-RBM) | 90.46% | 100% | 98.80% | 95.31% |
|
|
