Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 615439, 18 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/615439
Research Article

Compressed Sensing MRI Reconstruction from Highly Undersampled -Space Data Using Nonsubsampled Shearlet Transform Sparsity Prior

1School of Information Science & Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
2Department of Radiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China

Received 25 September 2014; Revised 12 February 2015; Accepted 20 February 2015

Academic Editor: Alessandro Gasparetto

Copyright © 2015 Min Yuan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. L. Donoho, “Compressed sensing,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1289–1306, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. J. Candès, J. Romberg, and T. Tao, “Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information,” IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 489–509, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Tsaig and D. L. Donoho, “Extensions of compressed sensing,” Signal Processing, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 549–571, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Lustig, D. Donoho, and J. M. Pauly, “Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1182–1195, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Trzasko and A. Manduca, “Highly undersampled magnetic resonance image reconstruction via homotopic l0-minimization,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 106–121, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. P. Haldar, D. Hernando, and Z.-P. Liang, “Compressed-sensing MRI with random encoding,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 893–903, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. T. Block, M. Uecker, and J. Frahm, “Undersampled radial MRI with multiple coils. Iterative image reconstruction using a total variation constraint,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1086–1098, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Huang, S. Zhang, and D. Metaxas, “Efficient MR image reconstruction for compressed MR imaging,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 670–679, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. N. Do and M. Vetterli, “The contourlet transform: an efficient directional multiresolution image representation,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 2091–2106, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S.-M. Gho, Y. Nam, S.-Y. Zho, E. Y. Kim, and D.-H. Kim, “Three dimension double inversion recovery gray matter imaging using compressed sensing,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1395–1402, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Lu and M. N. Do, “A new contourlet transform with sharp frequency localization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '06), pp. 1629–1632, Atlanta, Ga, USA, October 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. X. Qu, W. Zhang, D. Guo, C. Cai, S. Cai, and Z. Chen, “Iterative thresholding compressed sensing MRI based on contourlet transform,” Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 737–758, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. N. G. Kingsbury, “The dual tree complex wavelet transform: a new efficient tool for image restoration and enhancement,” in Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '98), pp. 319–322, Island of Rhodes, Greece, September 1998.
  14. Y. Kim, M. Altbach, T. Trouard, and A. Bilgin, “Compressed sensing using dual-tree complex wavelet transform,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM '09), p. 2814, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, April 2009.
  15. Z. Zhu, K. Wahid, P. Babyn, and R. Yang, “Compressed sensing-based MRI reconstruction using complex double-density dual-tree DWT,” International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, vol. 2013, Article ID 907501, 12 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Kim, M. S. Nadar, and A. Bilgin, “Wavelet-based compressed sensing using gaussian scale mixtures,” in Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM '10), p. 4856, Stockholm, Sweden, May 2010.
  17. Y. Kim, M. S. Nadar, and A. Bilgin, “Wavelet-based compressed sensing using a Gaussian scale mixture model,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 3102–3108, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. C. Chen and J. Huang, “Compressive sensing MRI with wavelet tree sparsity,” in Proceeding of the 26th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Lake Tahoe, Nev, USA, December 2012.
  19. C. Chen and J. Huang, “The benefit of tree sparsity in accelerated MRI,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 834–842, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Ma, W. Yin, Y. Zhang, and A. Chakraborty, “An efficient algorithm for compressed MR imaging using total variation and wavelets,” in Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '08), pp. 1–8, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, June 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Huang and F. Yang, “Compressed magnetic resonance imaging based on wavelet sparsity and nonlocal total variation,” in Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI '12), pp. 968–971, Barcelona, Spain, May 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X. Qu, X. Cao, D. Guo, C. Hu, and Z. Chen, “Combined sparsifying transforms for compressed sensing MRI,” Electronics Letters, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 121–123, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. Chen, J. Huang, and L. Axel, “Accelerated parallel magnetic resonance imaging with joint gradient and wavelet sparsity,” in Proceedings of the MICCAI Workshop on Sparsity Techniques in Medical Imaging, Nice, France, October 2012.
  24. S. Ravishankar and Y. Bresler, “MR image reconstruction from highly undersampled k-space data by dictionary learning,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1028–1041, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. Easley, D. Labate, and W.-Q. Lim, “Sparse directional image representations using the discrete shearlet transform,” Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 25–46, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  26. D. Labate, W. Q. Lim, G. Kutyniok, and G. Weiss, “Sparse multidimensional representation using shearlets,” in Wavelets XI, vol. 5914 of Proceeding of SPIE, pp. 254–262, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2005.
  27. W.-Q. Lim, “The discrete shearlet transform: a new directional transform and compactly supported shearlet frames,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1166–1180, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. K. Guo and D. Labate, “Optimally sparse multidimensional representation using shearlets,” SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 298–318, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  29. S. Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing: The Sparse Way, Academic Press, 2008.
  30. E. J. Candès and D. L. Donoho, “New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with piecewise C2 singularities,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 219–266, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. D. L. Donoho, “Sparse components of images and optimal atomic decompositions,” Constructive Approximation, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 353–382, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. B. S. Kashin, “Approximation properties of complete orthonormal systems,” Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta imeni V. A. Steklova, vol. 172, pp. 187–191, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  33. I. Daubechies, M. Defrise, and C. De Mol, “An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 1413–1457, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  34. M. A. Figueiredo and R. D. Nowak, “An EM algorithm for wavelet-based image restoration,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 906–916, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  35. K. Bredies and D. A. Lorenz, “Linear convergence of iterative soft-thresholding,” Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications, vol. 14, no. 5-6, pp. 813–837, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  36. I. Drori, “Fast l1 minimization by iterative thresholding for multidimensional NMR spectroscopy,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2007, Article ID 20248, 10 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  37. M. Zibulevsky and M. Elad, “L1-L2 Optimization in signal and image processing,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 76–88, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. W. Yin, S. Osher, and D. Goldfarb, “Bregman iterative algorithms for l1-minimization with applications to compressed sensing,” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 143–168, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  39. X. Qu, Y. Hou, F. Lam, D. Guo, J. Zhong, and Z. Chen, “Magnetic resonance image reconstruction from undersampled measurements using a patch-based nonlocal operator,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 843–856, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. B. Ning, X. Qu, D. Guo, C. Hu, and Z. Chen, “Magnetic resonance image reconstruction using trained geometric directions in 2D redundant wavelets domain and non-convex optimization,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1611–1622, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. X. Qu, D. Guo, B. Ning et al., “Undersampled MRI reconstruction with patch-based directional wavelets,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 964–977, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C. S. Xydeas and V. Petrović, “Objective image fusion performance measure,” Electronics Letters, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 308–309, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus