Research Article
Compressed Sensing MRI Reconstruction from Highly Undersampled -Space Data Using Nonsubsampled Shearlet Transform Sparsity Prior
Table 1
Comparison of the objective assessment indices of CS-MRI reconstruction via NSST-based to compared methods using three different sampling patterns with different sampling rates.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note. mask_Carteian_040 denotes with variable density Cartesian sampling mask in -space with 40% sampling rate, mask_VDS_2496 denotes variable density random sampling mask with 24.96% sampling rate, and mask_PRS_44_1635 denotes pseudoradial 44 lines sampling mask with 16.35% sampling rate. |