Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 627417, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/627417
Research Article

Speckle Noise Reduction via Nonconvex High Total Variation Approach

1Department of Health Management, Xi’an Medical University, Xi’an 710021, China
2School of Science, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China

Received 9 September 2014; Revised 26 January 2015; Accepted 29 January 2015

Academic Editor: Yaguo Lei

Copyright © 2015 Yulian Wu and Xiangchu Feng. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. K. Wong, “High range resolution profiles as motion-invariant features for moving ground targets identification in sar-based automatic target recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 1017–1039, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Liu, H. D. Cheng, J. Huang, J. Tian, X. Tang, and J. Liu, “Probability density difference-based active contour for ultrasound image segmentation,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 2028–2042, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Hebar, D. Gleich, and Ž. Čucej, “Autobinomial model for SAR image despeckling and information extraction,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 2818–2835, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G.-T. Li, C.-L. Wang, P.-P. Huang, and W.-D. Yu, “SAR image despeckling using a space-domain filter with alterable window,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 263–267, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Argenti, T. Bianchi, A. Lapini, and L. Alparone, “Fast MAP despeckling based on laplacian-gaussian modeling of wavelet coefficients,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C.-A. Deledalle, L. Denis, and F. Tupin, “Iterative weighted maximum likelihood denoising with probabilistic patch-based weights,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2661–2672, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. S. Osher, N. Paragios, L. Rudin, and P.-L. Lions, “Multiplicative denoising and deblurring: theory and algorithms,” in Geometric Level Set Methods in Imaging, Vision, and Graphics, pp. 103–119, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. G. Aubert and J.-F. Aujol, “A variational approach to removing multiplicative noise,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 925–946, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. Y.-M. Huang, M. K. Ng, and Y.-W. Wen, “A new total variation method for multiplicative noise removal,” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 20–40, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. J. M. Bioucas-Dias and M. A. Figueiredo, “Multiplicative noise removal using variable splitting and constrained optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1720–1730, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. G. Steidl and T. Teuber, “Removing multiplicative noise by Douglas-Rachford splitting methods,” Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 168–184, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. K. Bredies, K. Kunisch, and T. Pock, “Total generalized variation,” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 492–526, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. W. Feng, H. Lei, and Y. Gao, “Speckle reduction via higher order total variation approach,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1831–1843, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Nikolova, M. K. Ng, and C.-P. Tam, “Fast nonconvex nonsmooth minimization methods for image restoration and reconstruction,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 3073–3088, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. F. Bauss, M. Nikolova, and G. Steidl, “Fully smoothed l1-TV models: bounds for the minimizers and parameter choice,” Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 295–307, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Nikolova, M. Ng, and C. P. Tam, “On l1 data fitting and concave regularization for image recovery,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. A397–A430, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  17. Y. Han, X.-C. Feng, G. Baciu, and W.-W. Wang, “Nonconvex sparse regularizer based speckle noise removal,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 989–1001, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Ochs, A. Dosovitskiy, T. Brox, and T. Pock, “An iterated L1 algorithm for non-smooth non-convex optimization in computer vision,” in Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '13), pp. 1759–1766, June 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Knoll, K. Bredies, T. Pock, and R. Stollberger, “Second order total generalized variation (TGV) for MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 480–491, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. I. Daubechies, R. DeVore, M. Fornasier, and C. S. Güntürk, “Iteratively reweighted least squares minimization for sparse recovery,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–38, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. E. J. Candes, M. B. Wakin, and S. P. Boyd, “Enhancing sparsity by reweighted l1 minimization,” Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 877–905, 2008, (special issue on sparsity). View at Google Scholar
  22. A. Chambolle and T. Pock, “A first-order primal-dual algorithm for convex problems with applications to imaging,” Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 120–145, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. T. Pock and A. Chambolle, “Diagonal preconditioning for first order primal-dual algorithms in convex optimization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV '11), pp. 1762–1769, November 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Durand, J. Fadili, and M. Nikolova, “Multiplicative noise removal using L1 fidelity on frame coefficients,” Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 201–226, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus