Research Article
Face Recognition Using Double Sparse Local Fisher Discriminant Analysis
Table 1
The top recognition rates (%) and the corresponding dimensions on Yale database by different methods (mean ± std).
| | 2 trains | 3 trains | 4 trains | 5 trains | 6 trains |
| PCA | 46.30 ± 3.26 () | 51.58 ± 4.00 () | 56.19 ± 4.16 () | 57.33 ± 4.60 () | 62.40 ± 4.06 () | LDA | 45.11 ± 3.46 () | 62.08 ± 4.31 () | 70.86 ± 4.88 () | 71.44 ± 5.19 () | 77.22 ± 3.47 () | LPP | 45.26 ± 3.52 () | 62.83 ± 4.22 () | 70.57 ± 4.59 () | 72.22 ± 3.81 () | 78.00 ± 3.46 () | LFDA | 45.11 ± 3.46 () | 62.50 ± 5.43 () | 71.33 ± 5.07 () | 72.33 ± 5.09 () | 78.27 ± 3.72 () | SPCA | 43.19 ± 3.22 () | 49.83 ± 4.08 () | 54.95 ± 3.70 () | 56.78 ± 3.33 () | 61.87 ± 5.11 () | SLDA | 51.19 ± 5.78 () | 63.85 ± 3.47 () | 72.00 ± 4.76 () | 72.56 ± 2.29 () | 78.40 ± 2.42 () | SPP | 46.59 ± 5.36 () | 52.92 ± 3.63 () | 57.67 ± 3.54 () | 58.48 ± 3.76 () | 64.53 ± 4.63 () | DSNPE | 50.74 ± 5.26 () | 63.58 ± 3.64 () | 73.62 ± 5.04 () | 75.89 ± 2.82 () | 80.08 ± 2.61 () | DSLFDA | 53.11 ± 5.36 () | 65.17 ± 3.68 () | 73.24 ± 5.03 () | 74.44 ± 3.51 () | 81.47 ± 2.77 () |
|
|