The Likelihood Ranking Methods for Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets Considering Risk Preferences

Table 5

The corresponding weights of criterion .

Corresponding weight of attribute
	[(1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000; 0.8),; (1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000; 1.0)];
	[(0.0075 0.0075 0.0150 0.0525; 0.8),; (0.0000 0.0000 0.0200 0.0700; 1.0)];
	[(0.0875 0.1200 0.1600 0.1825; 0.8),; (0.0400 0.1000 0.1800 0.2300; 1.0)];
	[(1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000; 0.8),; (1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000; 1.0)];
	[(0.2325 0.2550 0.3250 0.3575; 0.8),; (0.1700 0.2200 0.3600 0.4200; 1.0)];
	[(0.4025 0.4525 0.5375 0.5675; 0.8),; (0.3200 0.4100 0.5800 0.6500; 1.0)];
	[(0.9475 0.9850 0.9925 0.9925; 0.8),; (0.9300 0.9800 1.0000 1.0000; 1.0)];
	[(0.6500 0.6725 0.7575 0.7900; 0.8),; (0.5800 0.6300 0.8000 0.8600; 1.0)];
	[(0.7825 0.8150 0.8850 0.9075; 0.8),; (0.7200 0.7800 0.9200 0.9700; 1.0)]