Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 715018, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/715018
Research Article

On the Generalization Capabilities of the Ten-Parameter Jiles-Atherton Model

Department of Engineering, Roma Tre University, Via Vito Volterra 62, 00146 Rome, Italy

Received 5 October 2015; Accepted 24 November 2015

Academic Editor: Xiao-Qiao He

Copyright © 2015 Gabriele Maria Lozito et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. D. Mayergoyz, Mathematical Models of Hysteresis and Their Applications, Academic Press, 2003.
  2. E. Cardelli, M. Carpentieri, A. Faba, and G. Finocchio, “Modeling of hysteresis in magnetic multidomains,” Physica B: Condensed Matter, vol. 435, pp. 62–65, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. I. Koltermann, L. A. Righi, J. P. A. Bastos, R. Carlson, N. Sadowski, and N. J. Batistela, “A modified Jiles method for hysteresis computation including minor loops,” Physica B: Condensed Matter, vol. 275, no. 1–3, pp. 233–237, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. Cardelli, E. D. Torre, and A. Faba, “Numerical modeling of hysteresis in si-fe steels,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 50, no. 2, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Ruderman and T. Bertram, “Identification of soft magnetic B-H characteristics using discrete dynamic preisach model and single measured hysteresis loop,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1281–1284, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. C. Stoner and E. P. Wohlfarth, “A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 240, no. 826, pp. 599–642, 1948. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. E. Cardelli, E. Della Torre, V. Esposito, and A. Faba, “Theoretical considerations of magnetic hysteresis and transformer inrush current,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 5247–5250, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Bertotti, “Dynamic generalization of the scalar Preisach model of hysteresis,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 2599–2601, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. I. D. Mayergoyz, G. Friedman, and C. Salling, “Comparison of the classical and generalized Preisach hysteresis models with experiments,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 3925–3927, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Bergqvist and G. Engdahl, “A stress-dependent magnetic Preisach hysteresis model,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 4796–4798, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Salvini, F. R. Fulginei, and G. Pucacco, “Generalization of the static Preisach model for dynamic hysteresis by a genetic approach,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1353–1356, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Cardelli, E. D. Torre, and A. Faba, “A general vector hysteresis operator: extension to the 3-D case,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 3990–4000, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. D. Dimitropoulos, G. I. Stamoulis, and E. Hristoforou, “A 3-D hybrid Jiles-Atherton/Stoner-Wohlfarth magnetic hysteresis model for inductive sensors and actuators,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 721–736, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. R. Marion, R. Scorretti, N. Siauve, M. Raulet, and L. Krähenbühl, “Identification of Jiles-Atherton model parameters using particle swarm optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 894–897, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. E. Cardelli, E. D. Torre, and B. Tellini, “Direct and inverse Preisach modeling of soft materials,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1267–1271, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Chwastek and J. Szczygłowski, “An alternative method to estimate the parameters of Jiles-Atherton model,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 314, no. 1, pp. 47–51, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Laudani, F. R. Fulginei, and A. Salvini, “Comparative analysis of Bouc-Wen and Jiles-Atherton models under symmetric excitations,” Physica B: Condensed Matter, vol. 435, pp. 134–137, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Laudani, F. R. Fulginei, and A. Salvini, “Bouc-wen hysteresis model identification by the metric-topological evolutionary optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 50, no. 2, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Cardelli and A. Faba, “A benchmark problem of vector magnetic hysteresis for numerical models,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 50, no. 2, Article ID 7026004, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Kuczmann and A. Iványi, “Neural network model of magnetic hysteresis,” COMPEL, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 364–376, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Del Vecchio and A. Salvini, “Neural network and fourier descriptor macromodeling dynamic hysteresis,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1242–1245, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Serpico and C. Visone, “Magnetic hysteresis modeling via feed-forward neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 623–628, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Salvini and C. Coltelli, “Prediction of dynamic hysteresis under highly distorted exciting fields by neural networks and actual frequency transplantation,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 3315–3319, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. I. Kucuk, “Prediction of hysteresis loop in magnetic cores using neural network and genetic algorithm,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 305, no. 2, pp. 423–427, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. R. Fulginei and A. Salvini, “Neural network approach for modelling hysteretic magnetic materials under distorted excitations,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 307–310, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. H. Saliah, D. A. Lowther, and B. Forghani, “A neural network model of magnetic hysteresis for computational magnetics,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 4146–4148, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Kuczmann and A. Iványi, “A new neural-network-based scalar hysteresis model,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 857–860, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. Makaveev, L. Dupré, M. De Wulf, and J. Melkebeek, “Modeling of quasistatic magnetic hysteresis with feed-forward neural networks,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 89, no. 11, pp. 6737–6739, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Laudani, G. M. Lozito, and F. R. Fulginei, “Dynamic hysteresis modelling of magnetic materials by using a neural network approach,” in Proceedings of the IEEE AEIT Annual Conference-From Research to Industry: The Need for a More Effective Technology Transfer (AEIT '14), pp. 1–6, Trieste, Italy, September 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L. Chuntao and T. Yonghong, “A neural networks model for hysteresis nonlinearity,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 49–54, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. C. Jiles and D. L. Atherton, “Ferromagnetic hysteresis,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 2183–2185, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. C. Jiles and D. L. Atherton, “Theory of the magnetisation process in ferromagnets and its application to the magnetomechanical effect,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1265–1281, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. C. Jiles and D. L. Atherton, “Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 61, no. 1-2, pp. 48–60, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. C. Jiles and D. L. Atherton, “Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis (invited),” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2115–2120, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. C. Jiles and J. B. Thoelke, “Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis: determination of model parameters from experimental hysteresis loops,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 3928–3930, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. C. Jiles, J. B. Thoelke, and M. K. Devine, “Numerical determination of hysteresis parameters for the modeling of magnetic properties using the theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K. Chwastek and J. Szczyglowski, “Identification of a hysteresis model parameters with genetic algorithms,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 206–211, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. V. Leite, S. L. Avila, N. J. Batistela et al., “Real coded genetic algorithm for Jiles-Atherton model parameters identification,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 888–891, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. S. Coco, A. Laudani, G. Pollicino, G. Pulcini, F. R. Fulginei, and A. Salvini, “TWT magnetic focusing structure optimization by parallel evolutionary algorithm,” COMPEL, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1338–1346, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. L. S. Coelho, F. Guerra, N. J. Batistela, and J. V. Leite, “Multiobjective cuckoo search algorithm based on duffing's oscillator applied to jiles-atherton vector hysteresis parameters estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1745–1748, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. Coco, A. Laudani, G. Pulcini, F. R. Fulginei, and A. Salvini, “Shape optimization of multistage depressed collectors by parallel evolutionary algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 435–438, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. L. D. S. Coelho, F. A. Guerra, and J. V. Leite, “Multiobjective exponential particle swarm optimization approach applied to hysteresis parameters estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 283–286, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. K. Chwastek and J. Szczygłowski, “Estimation methods for the Jiles-Atherton model of hysteresis—a review,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Applied Electromagnetics, pp. 33–40, Zamosc, Poland, 2008.
  44. S. Coco, A. Laudani, F. R. Fulginei, and A. Salvini, “Bacterial chemotaxis shape optimization of electromagnetic devices,” Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 910–923, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. Å. Knypiński, L. Nowak, P. Sujka, and K. Radziuk, “Application of a PSO algorithm for identification of the parameters of Jiles-Atherton hysteresis model,” Archives of Electrical Engineering, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 139–148, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. L. D. S. Coelho, V. C. Mariani, and J. V. Leite, “Solution of Jiles-Atherton vector hysteresis parameters estimation by modified differential evolution approaches,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 2021–2025, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. P. S. Baghel and S. V. Kulkarni, “Parameter identification of the Jiles–Atherton hysteresis model using a hybrid technique,” IET Electric Power Applications, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 689–695, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. D. Lederer, H. Igarashi, A. Kost, and T. Honma, “On the parameter identification and application of the Jiles-Atherton hysteresis model for numerical modelling of measured characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1211–1214, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. S. Coco, A. Laudani, G. Pulcini, F. Riganti Fulginei, and A. Salvini, “Optimization of multistage depressed collectors using fem and parallel algorithm MeTEO,” COMPEL—The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1955–1963, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. P. R. Wilson, J. N. Ross, and A. D. Brown, “Optimizing the Jiles-Atherton model of hysteresis by a genetic algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 989–993, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. Toman, G. Štumberger, and D. Dolinar, “Parameter identification of the Jiles–Atherton hysteresis model using differential evolution,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1098–1101, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. G. M. Lozito and A. Salvini, “An empirical investigation on the static Jiles-Atherton model identification by using different set of measurements,” in Proceedings of the AEIT Annual Conference—From Research to Industry: The Need for a More Effective Technology Transfer (AEIT '14), pp. 1–6, IEEE, Trieste, Italy, September 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. A. Laudani, F. Riganti Fulginei, A. Salvini, M. Schmid, and S. Conforto, “CFSO3: a new supervised swarm-based optimization algorithm,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 560614, 13 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. A. Laudani, F. R. Fulginei, and A. Salvini, “Closed forms for the fully-connected continuous flock of starlings optimization algorithm,” in Proceedings of the UKSim 15th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation (UKSim '13), pp. 45–50, IEEE, Cambridge, UK, April 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. Laudani, F. R. Fulginei, G. M. Lozito, and A. Salvini, “Swarm/flock optimization algorithms as continuous dynamic systems,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 243, pp. 670–683, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. S. Coco, A. Laudani, F. R. Fulginei, and A. Salvini, “Accurate design of Helmholtz coils for ELF Bioelectromagnetic interaction by means of Continuous FSO,” International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, vol. 39, no. 1–4, pp. 651–656, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. Laudani, F. R. Fulginei, and A. Salvini, “TMS array coils optimization by means of CFSO,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 51, no. 3, Article ID 8001104, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar