Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 790974, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/790974
Research Article

Method for Determining the Maximum Allowable Capacity of Wind Farm Based on Box Set Robust Optimization

1School of Electrical Engineering, Xuchang University, Xuchang 461000, China
2School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received 19 July 2015; Revised 16 October 2015; Accepted 18 October 2015

Academic Editor: Peng-Yeng Yin

Copyright © 2015 Lihui Guo and Hao Bai. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. B. Eriksen, T. Ackermann, H. Abildgaard, P. Smith, W. Winter, and J. M. R. Garcia, “System operation with high wind penetration,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 65–74, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. N. Liew and G. Strbac, “Maximising penetration of wind generation in existing distribution networks,” IEE Proceedings: Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 256–262, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. N. Koutroumpezis and A. S. Safigianni, “Optimum allocation of the maximum possible distributed generation penetration in a distribution network,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 80, no. 12, pp. 1421–1427, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. M. Ayres, W. Freitas, M. C. De Almeida, and L. C. P. Da Silva, “Method for determining the maximum allowable penetration level of distributed generation without steady-state voltage violations,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 495–508, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. A. Kordkheili, B. Bak-Jensen, and P. Mahat, “Determining maximum photovoltaic penetration in a distribution grid considering grid operation limits,” in Proceedings of the IEEE PES General Meeting, Conference & Exposition, pp. 1–5, National Harbor, Md, USA, July 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. P. Karimi-Zare and H. Seifi, “Maximum allowable penetration level determination of a DG in a distribution network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Energy Conference and Exhibition (ENERGYCON '12), pp. 355–360, IEEE, Florence, Italy, September 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. V. R. Pandi, H. H. Zeineldin, and W. Xiao, “Determining optimal location and size of distributed generation resources considering harmonic and protection coordination limits,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1245–1254, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Bhowmik, A. Maitra, S. M. Halpin, and J. E. Schatz, “Determination of allowable penetration levels of distributed generation resources based on harmonic limit considerations,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 619–624, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J.-H. Wang, N.-L. Tai, K. Song, L.-F. Gu, and J.-Q. Sheng, “Penetration level permission of for DG in distributed network considering relay protection,” Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, vol. 22, pp. 37–43, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Tao, J. Guo, and X. Xiao, “Analysis on allowed penetration level of distributed generation and its grid-connected position based on principles of current protection,” Power System Technology, no. 1, pp. 265–270, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  11. V. Van Thong and R. Belmans, “Maximum penetration level of distributed generation with safety criteria,” European Transactions on Electrical Power, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 367–381, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. A. Chowdhury, W. Shen, N. Hosseinzadeh, and H. R. Pota, “Transient stability of power system integrated with doubly fed induction generator wind farms,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 9, pp. 184–194, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  13. Y. Z. Lei, W. S. Wang, Y. H. Yin, and H. Z. Dai, “Wind power penetration limit calculation based on chance constrained programming,” Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 5, article 006, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  14. J. V. Seguro and T. W. Lambert, “Modern estimation of the parameters of the Weibull wind speed distribution for wind energy analysis,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. A. Akdağ and A. Dinler, “A new method to estimate Weibull parameters for wind energy applications,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1761–1766, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Hu, L. Wu, and M. Marwali, “On the robust solution to SCUC with load and wind uncertainty correlations,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2952–2964, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Jiang, J. Wang, and Y. Guan, “Robust unit commitment with wind power and pumped storage hydro,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 800–810, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Zhao, J. Wang, J.-P. Watson, and Y. Guan, “Multi-stage robust unit commitment considering wind and demand response uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 2708–2717, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. A. M. Van Amerongen, “A general-purpose version of the fast decoupled load flow,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 760–770, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. Saadat, Power System Analysis, McGraw-Hill Primis Custom, 2002.
  21. A. L. Soyster, “Technical note—convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming,” Operations Research, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1154–1157, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. A. Ben-Tal and A. Nemirovski, “Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 411–424, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Ben-Tal and A. Nemirovski, “Robust optimization—methodology and applications,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 453–480, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Gan, X. Luo, D. V. Bourcier, and R. J. Thomas, “Min-max transfer capabilities of transmission interfaces,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy System, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 347–353, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. O. Alsac and B. Stott, “Optimal load flow with steady-state security,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-93, no. 3, pp. 745–751, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Z. Xu, Y. Liu, Y. B. Liu, and M. Bazargan, “Node importance classified comprehensive assessment,” Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1609–1617, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar