Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 791204, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/791204
Research Article

A Selection Method Based on MAGDM with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

1College of Science, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
2College of Information Technology, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China
3College of Information Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541002, China

Received 3 December 2014; Accepted 11 May 2015

Academic Editor: Julien Bruchon

Copyright © 2015 Gai-Li Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Sun, H. Dong, F. K. Hussain, O. K. Hussain, and E. Chang, “Cloud service selection: state-of-the-art and future research directions,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 45, pp. 134–150, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Ding, C. Xia, Q. Cai, K. Zhou, and S. Yang, “QoS-aware resource matching and recommendation for cloud computing systems,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 247, no. 15, pp. 941–950, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. A. Goscinski and M. Brock, “Toward dynamic and attribute based publication, discovery and selection for cloud computing,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 947–970, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Jula, E. Sundararajan, and Z. Othman, “Cloud computing service composition: a systematic literature review,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 3809–3824, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Siegel and J. Perdue, “Cloud services measures for global use: the Service Measurement Index (SMI),” in Proceedings of the Annual SRII Global Conference (SRII '12), pp. 411–415, IEEE, San Jose, Calif, USA, July 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. K. Garg, S. Versteeg, and R. Buyya, “SMICloud: a framework for comparing and ranking cloud services,” in Proceedings of the 4th IEEE/ACM international conference on utility and Cloud on utility and Cloud computing (UCC ’11), pp. 210–218, Melbourne, Australia, December 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Menzel, M. Schönherr, and S. Tai, “(MC2)2: criteria, requirements and a software prototype for Cloud infrastructure decisions,” Software: Practice and Experience, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1283–1297, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Limam and R. Boutaba, “Assessing software service quality and trustworthiness at selection time,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 559–574, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Silas, E. B. Rajsingh, and K. Ezra, “Efficient Service Selection middleware using ELECTRE methodology for cloud environments,” Information Technology Journal, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 868–875, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Saripalli and G. Pingali, “MADMAC: multiple attribute decision methodology for Adoption of clouds,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD '11), pp. 316–323, Washington, DC, USA, July 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Zhao, Y. Ren, M. Li, and K. Sakurai, “Flexible service selection with user-specific QoS support in service-oriented architecture,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 962–973, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C.-W. Chang, P. Liu, and J.-J. Wu, “Probability-based cloud storage providers selection algorithms with maximum availability,” in Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP '12), pp. 199–208, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, September 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Sundareswaran, A. Squicciarini, D. Lin, and S. Sundareswaran, “A brokerage-based approach for cloud service selection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD '12), pp. 558–565, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, June 2012.
  14. Q. He, J. Han, Y. Yang, J. Grundy, and H. Jin, “QoS-driven service selection for multi-tenant SaaS,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD '12), pp. 24–29, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, June 2012.
  15. B. Martens, F. Teuteberg, and M. Gräuler, “Design and implementation of a community platform for the evaluation and selection of Cloud computing services: a market analysis,” in Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS '11), p. 215, Helsinki, Finland, June 2011.
  16. J. Yang, W. M. Lin, and W. C. Dou, “An adaptive service selection method for cross-cloud service composition,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, vol. 25, no. 18, pp. 2435–2454, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. L. Xu and F. Liu, “An approach to group decision making based on interval multiplicative and fuzzy preference relations by using projection,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 3929–3943, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. S.-P. Wan and D.-F. Li, “Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees,” Omega, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 925–940, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S.-P. Wan and J.-Y. Dong, “Possibility linear programming with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 38, no. 5-6, pp. 1660–1672, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. H. Akdag, T. Kalaycı, S. Karagöz, H. Zülfikar, and D. Giz, “The evaluation of hospital service quality by fuzzy MCDM,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 23, pp. 239–248, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Computation, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. K. Atanassov and G. Gargov, “Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 343–349, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. S.-P. Wan and J.-Y. Dong, “Power geometric operators of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 29, pp. 153–168, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. S. P. Wan, W. Feng, L. L. Lin, and J. Y. Dong, “An intuitionistic fuzzy linear programming method for logistics outsourcing provider selection,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 82, pp. 80–94, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. S. P. Wan and J. Y. Dong, “Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees,” Information Fusion, vol. 26, pp. 49–65, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. S. P. Wan, G. L. Xu, F. Wan, and J. Y. Dong, “A new method for Atanassov's interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MAGDM with incomplete attribute weight information,” Information Sciences, vol. 316, pp. 329–347, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. S.-P. Wan and D.-F. Li, “Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy programming method for heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making with atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 300–312, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. L. Deng, Gray System Theory, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, Wuhan, China, 2002.
  30. Z.-S. Xu, “Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making,” Control and Decision, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 215–219, 2007 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G.-D. Li, D. Yamaguchi, and M. Nagai, “A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 46, no. 3-4, pp. 573–581, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. W. J. Gu, Z. C. Sun, X. Z. Wei, and H. F. Dai, “A new method of accelerated life testing based on the Grey System Theory for a model-based lithium-ion battery life evaluation system,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 267, pp. 366–379, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. H. B. Kuang, D. M. Kilgour, and K. W. Hipel, “Grey-based PROMETHEE II with application to evaluation of source water protection strategies,” Information Sciences, vol. 294, no. 10, pp. 376–389, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  34. F. Y. Meng, Q. Zhang, and X. H. Cheng, “Approaches to multiple-criteria group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral with respect to the generalized λ-Shapley index,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 37, pp. 237–249, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Wan and J. Dong, “A possibility degree method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 237–256, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  36. Z. L. Yue and Y. Jia, “An application of soft computing technique in group decision making under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 2490–2503, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. X. L. Zhang and Z. S. Xu, “Soft computing based on maximizing consensus and fuzzy TOPSIS approach to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 26, pp. 42–56, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. D. F. Li, Multiobjective Many-Person Decision Makings and Games, National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, China, 2003.
  39. S. Cebi and C. Kahraman, “Developing a group decision support system based on fuzzy information axiom,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. G. Qian, H. Wang, and X. Q. Feng, “Generalized hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision support system,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 37, pp. 357–365, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus