Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 815257, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/815257
Research Article

Comparative Analysis of Al-Li Alloy and Aluminum Honeycomb Panel for Aerospace Application by Structural Optimization

1College of Mechatronics Engineering and Automation, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
2Ordnance Technology Institute, Ordnance Engineering College, Shijiazhuang 050003, China
3College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

Received 5 July 2015; Revised 8 September 2015; Accepted 9 September 2015

Academic Editor: Mohammed Nouari

Copyright © 2015 Naihui Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Giummarra, B. Thomas, and R. Rioja, “New aluminum lithium alloys for aerospace applications,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Light Metals Technology Conference, Bombardier Aerospace and Alcoa Trade Study, Québec, Canada, September 2007.
  2. R. R. Boyer, “An overview on the use of titanium in the aerospace industry,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 213, no. 1-2, pp. 103–114, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Peters, J. Kumpfert, C. H. Ward, and C. Leyens, “Titanium alloys for aerospace applications,” Advanced Engineering Materials, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 419–427, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. C. Botelho, R. A. Silva, L. C. Pardini, and M. C. Rezende, “A review on the development and properties of continuous fiber/epoxy/aluminum hybrid composites for aircraft structures,” Materials Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 247–256, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. D. Mangalgiri, “Composite materials for aerospace applications,” Bulletin of Materials Science, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 657–664, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. J. Rioja and J. Liu, “The evolution of Al-Li base products for aerospace and space applications,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 3325–3337, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. K. Gupta, N. Nayan, G. Nagasireesha, and S. C. Sharma, “Development and characterization of Al-Li alloys,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 420, no. 1-2, pp. 228–234, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. G. Galletti, C. Vinquist, and O. S. Es-Said, “Theoretical design and analysis of a honeycomb panel sandwich structure loaded in pure bending,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 555–562, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. K. Paik, A. K. Thayamballi, and G. S. Kim, “Strength characteristics of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 205–231, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. J. Kim and D. G. Lee, “Development of a satellite structure with the sandwich T-joint,” Composite Structures, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 460–468, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. Bianchi, G. S. Aglietti, and G. Richardson, “Development of efficient and cost-effective spacecraft structures based on honeycomb panel assemblies,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–10, Big Sky, Mont, USA, March 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Librescu and T. Hause, “Recent developments in the modeling and behavior of advanced sandwich constructions: a survey,” Composite Structures, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Lin, Z. Zheng, S. Li, X. Kong, and Y. Han, “Microstructures and properties of 2099 Al-Li alloy,” Materials Characterization, vol. 84, pp. 88–99, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. R. Srinivas, Robust Design and Realization of Spacecraft Payload Elements Using Optistruct as an Optimization Tool, Space Application Centre ISRO, 2008.
  15. N. Noilublao and S. Bureerat, “Simultaneous topology, shape and sizing optimisation of a three-dimensional slender truss tower using multiobjective evolutionary algorithms,” Computers & Structures, vol. 89, no. 23-24, pp. 2531–2538, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Zhu, W. Zhang, P. Beckers, Y. Chen, and Z. Guo, “Simultaneous design of components layout and supporting structures using coupled shape and topology optimization technique,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 29–41, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. A. S. Gendy, S. N. Patnaik, D. A. Hopkins, and L. Berke, “Optimization of Space Station components using design code CometBoards,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 129, no. 1-2, pp. 133–149, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Buchanan, “Development of a wingbox rib for a passenger jet aircraft using design optimization and constrained to traditional design and manufacture requirements,” in Proceedings of the CAE Technology Conference, April 2007.
  19. P. L. Schoonover, W. A. Crossley, and S. D. Heister, “Application of a genetic algorithm to the optimization of hybrid rockets,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 622–629, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. R. Taylor, “Evaluation of multidisciplinary design optimization techniques as applied to spacecraft design,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 371–384, IEEE, Big Sky, Mont, USA, March 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. K. Maute and M. Allen, “Conceptual design of aeroelastic structures by topology optimization,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 27, no. 1-2, pp. 27–42, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Z. Fang and L. Zheng, “Topology optimization for minimizing the resonant response of plates with constrained layer damping treatment,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 2015, Article ID 376854, 11 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. N. S. Ermolaeva, M. B. G. Castro, and P. V. Kandachar, “Materials selection for an automotive structure by integrating structural optimization with environmental impact assessment,” Materials & Design, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 689–698, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. W. Hansel and W. Becker, “Layerwise adaptive topology optimization of laminate structures,” Engineering Computations (Swansea, Wales), vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 841–851, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Altair Engineering Inc, Optistruct 8.0 User Manual, Altair Engineering Inc, 2007.
  26. H. G. Allen, Analysis and Design of Structural Sandwich Panels, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1969.
  27. A. K. Noor, W. S. Burton, and C. W. Bert, “Computational models for sandwich panels and shells,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 155–199, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus