Research Article
Performance Improvement of Collision Warning System on Curved Road Based on Intervehicle Communication
Table 3
Margin of error, ICCWS, CCWS, and FCWS.
| ā | Standard speed [km/h] | Collision warning system | Margin of error [%] |
| Scenario 1 |
20 | ICCWS | 3.18 | CCWS | 10.67 | FCWS | 83.40 |
25 | ICCWS | 2.40 | CCWS | 10.00 | FCWS | 81.73 |
30 | ICCWS | 2.96 | CCWS | 10.48 | FCWS | 81.76 |
| Scenario 2 |
30 | ICCWS | 1.06 | CCWS | 10.32 | FCWS | 78.20 |
35 | ICCWS | 0.78 | CCWS | 10.17 | FCWS | 77.92 |
40 | ICCWS | 2.65 | CCWS | 12.38 | FCWS | 80.07 |
| Scenario 3 |
40 | ICCWS | 1.15 | CCWS | 8.17 | FCWS | 79.30 |
45 | ICCWS | 1.94 | CCWS | 8.66 | FCWS | 79.88 |
50 | ICCWS | 2.20 | CCWS | 8.68 | FCWS | 79.80 |
| Scenario 4 |
50 | ICCWS | 0.59 | CCWS | 5.23 | FCWS | 82.58 |
55 | ICCWS | 1.33 | CCWS | 5.70 | FCW | 82.96 |
60 | ICCWS | 1.11 | CCWS | 5.53 | FCWS | 83.19 |
|
|