Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 851303, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/851303
Research Article

QFD Based Benchmarking Logic Using TOPSIS and Suitability Index

1Department of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University, 126 Jukjeon-dong, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do 448-701, Republic of Korea
2Department of Architecture, Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do 446-701, Republic of Korea

Received 10 April 2015; Accepted 26 July 2015

Academic Editor: Mohamed Marzouk

Copyright © 2015 Jaeho Cho et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. M. Fifer, “Cost benchmarking functions in the value chain,” Strategy & Leadership, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 18–19, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. I. Dikmen, M. Talat Birgonul, and S. Kiziltas, “Strategic use of quality function deployment (QFD) in the construction industry,” Building and Environment, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 245–255, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Bolar, S. Tesfamariam, and R. Sadiq, “Management of civil infrastructure systems: QFD-based approach,” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, Article ID 04013009, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Chun and J. Cho, “QFD model based on a suitability assessment for the reduction of design changes in unsatisfactory quality,” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 113–120, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P.-C. Liao, W. J. O'Brien, S. R. Thomas, J. Dai, and S. P. Mulva, “Factors affecting engineering productivity,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 229–235, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. E. Bogan and M. J. English, Benchmarking for Best Practices: Winning Through Innovative Adaptation, Best Practices, LLC, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  7. B. Ghahramani and A. Houshyar, “Benchmarking the application of quality function deployment in rapid prototyping,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 61, no. 1-2, pp. 201–206, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Kumar, J. Antony, and T. S. Dhakar, “Integrating quality function deployment and benchmarking to achieve greater profitability,” Benchmarking, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 290–310, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Pérez-Lombard, J. Ortiz, R. González, and I. R. Maestre, “A review of benchmarking, rating and labelling concepts within the framework of building energy certification schemes,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 272–278, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Fazio, H. S. He, A. Hammad, and M. Horvat, “IFC-based framework for evaluating total performance of building envelopes,” Journal of Architectural Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 44–53, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. F. E. Preiser and J. C. Vischer, Assessing Building Performance, Routledge, 2012, First published by: Elsevier 2005.
  12. C. J. Kibert, Sustainable Construction: Green Building and Delivery, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 2008.
  13. WBDG, “Building Envelope Design Guide-Curtain Walls,” http://www.wbdg.org/design/env_fenestration_cw.php.
  14. A. Aksamija, Perkins+Will, Sustainable Facades, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013.
  15. J. Lee and J. Chun, “A numerical value evaluation model for the optimum design selection,” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 283–290, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Sui Pheng and D. L. L. T’ng, “Factors influencing design development time of commercial properties in Singapore,” Facilities, vol. 16, no. 1/2, pp. 40–51, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. J. Marsot, “QFD: a methodological tool for integration of ergonomics at the design stage,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 185–192, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Kagioglou, R. Cooper, G. Aouad, and M. Sexton, “Rethinking construction: the generic design and construction process protocol,” Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 141–153, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Austin, A. Newton, J. Steele, and P. Waskett, “Modelling and managing project complexity,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 191–198, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. A. Carnevalli and P. C. Miguel, “Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD—types of research, difficulties and benefits,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 737–754, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. A. Mohsini, “Performance and building: problems of evaluation,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 235–242, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. N. Singhaputtangkul, S. P. Low, A. L. Teo, and B.-G. Hwang, “Knowledge-based decision support system quality function deployment (KBDSS-QFD) tool for assessment of building envelopes,” Automation in Construction, vol. 35, pp. 314–328, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. O. Ogunlana, “Construction professional's perception of critical success factors for large-scale construction projects,” Construction Innovation, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 149–167, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. P. Rashvand and M. Z. Abd Majid, “Critical criteria on client and customer satisfaction for the issue of performance measurement,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Xie, K. C. Tan, and T. N. Goh, Advanced QFD Applications, ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, Wis, USA, 2003.
  26. J. A. Harding, K. Popplewell, R. Y. K. Fung, and A. R. Omar, “Intelligent information framework relating customer requirements and product characteristics,” Computers in Industry, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 51–65, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Li, L. Jin, and J. Wang, “A new MCDM method combining QFD with TOPSIS for knowledge management system selection from the user's perspective in intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 21, pp. 28–37, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Y. Q. Yang, S. Q. Wang, M. Dulaimi, and S. P. Low, “A fuzzy quality function deployment system for buildable design decision-makings,” Automation in Construction, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 381–393, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L.-K. Chan and M.-L. Wu, “A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example,” Omega, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 119–139, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L.-H. Chen and W.-C. Ko, “Fuzzy approaches to quality function deployment for new product design,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 160, no. 18, pp. 2620–2639, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. R. Y. Fung, Y. Chen, and J. Tang, “Estimating the functional relationships for quality function deployment under uncertainties,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 98–120, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. S. Yousefie, M. Mohammadi, and J. H. Monfared, “Selection effective management tools on setting European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) model by a quality function deployment (QFD) approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 9633–9647, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Y. Lin, H.-P. Cheng, M.-L. Tseng, and J. C. C. Tsai, “Using QFD and ANP to analyze the environmental production requirements in linguistic preferences,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 2186–2196, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. H. Raharjo, A. C. Brombacher, and M. Xie, “Dealing with subjectivity in early product design phase: a systematic approach to exploit quality function deployment potentials,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 253–278, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. Garibay, H. Gutiérrez, and A. Figueroa, “Evaluation of a digital library by means of quality function deployment (QFD) and the kano model,” Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 125–132, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Azadi and R. Farzipoor Saen, “A combination of QFD and imprecise DEA with enhanced Russell graph measure: a case study in healthcare,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 281–291, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Y.-L. Li, J.-F. Tang, K.-S. Chin, Y. Han, and X.-G. Luo, “A rough set approach for estimating correlation measures in quality function deployment,” Information Sciences, vol. 189, pp. 126–142, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. Park and K.-J. Kim, “Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 569–581, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. E. Pullman, W. L. Moore, and D. G. Wardell, “A comparison of quality function deployment and conjoint analysis in new product design,” The Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 354–364, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H. Moskowitz and K. J. Kim, “QFD optimizer: a novice friendly quality function deployment decision support system for optimizing product designs,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 641–655, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. D. Ginn and M. Zairi, “Best practice QFD application: an internal/external benchmarking approach based on ford motors' experience,” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 38–58, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. W. Yan, L. P. Khoo, and C.-H. Chen, “A QFD-enabled product conceptualisation approach via design knowledge hierarchy and RCE neural network,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 279–293, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. R. Y. K. Fung, Y. Chen, and J. Tang, “Estimating the functional relationships for quality function deployment under uncertainties,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 98–120, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  44. S. M. Ahmed, L. P. Sang, and Ž. M. Torbica, “Use of quality function deployment in civil engineering capital project planning,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 358–368, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. H. Moskowitz and K. J. Kim, “QFD optimizer: a novice friendly quality function deployment decision support system for optimizing product designs,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 641–655, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. L. Hwang and K. P. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Appli-Cations, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1981. View at MathSciNet
  47. Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, “Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decison making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 246–262, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  48. C. L. Hwang and K. P. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, vol. 186 of Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1981. View at MathSciNet