Research Article
QFD Based Benchmarking Logic Using TOPSIS and Suitability Index
Table 3
Weighted data for users’ preference.
| Product | value (glazing) | value (total) | SHGC (summer) | SHGC (winter) | VT | CR | AT | Aesthetic | WS | WT | Preference and rank | Distance scale | Distance scale | Distance scale | Distance scale | Distance scale | Distance scale | Distance scale | Ordinal scale () | Ordinal scale () | Binary scale | | |
| Max | 4.2 | 10.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 4.2 | 4.2 | | |
| Min | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | | |
| 1 | 3.5 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 0.75 | 2 | 2 | 3.2 | 7.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 0.71 | 3 | 3 | 3.0 | 6.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 4.2 | 0.57 | 7 | 4 | 3.3 | 7.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 0.71 | 3 | 5 | 3.6 | 8.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 0.71 | 3 | 6 | 3.2 | 7.2 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 0.64 | 5 | 7 | 3.6 | 8.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 0.77 | 1 | 8 | 3.1 | 7.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 0.69 | 4 | 9 | 3.6 | 8.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 4.2 | 0.63 | 6 | 10 | 3.4 | 7.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 0.75 | 2 |
|
|
Product ID (): current solution; product ID (): benchmarking solution.
|