Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Volume 2015, Article ID 852303, 10 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/852303

## Robust Control for Switched Nonlinear System with Multiple Delays

^{1}College of Mathematics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China^{2}Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, China

Received 20 January 2015; Revised 13 April 2015; Accepted 16 April 2015

Academic Editor: Carlo Cosentino

Copyright © 2015 Juan Liu and Qingdao Huang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

This paper focuses on the problem of robust control for a class of switched nonlinear systems with multiple time delays which are allowed to appear not only in state but also in input. We will design a controller and a switching law under which the system is “robust stable” and has performance -gain . Besides, multiple Lyapunov-Razumikhin functions which are relatively less conservative are introduced to investigate the stability of the candidate switched system. In detail, firstly, for uncertain nonlinear switched system with time-varying delays, sufficient condition is given by inequalities which are equivalent to LMIs, so it is easy to be solved; then, as a special case, nonlinear switched system with constant time delay is also considered. Finally, by providing numerical examples, the feasibility of the proposed approach is demonstrated.

#### 1. Introduction

Switched systems have constituted a very active field of current scientific research; many real world processes and systems can be modeled as switched systems, such as chemical processes and computer controlled systems. Besides, switched systems are extensively applied in many domains, including mechanical systems, automation, aircraft and air traffic control, and many other fields. And stability analysis and control, as the most important topics for the study of switched systems, have been studied widely [1–11]. Up to now, some methods are given to solve the stability analysis for switched system. For example, by constructing a common Lyapunov function, stability under arbitrary switching can be obtained. However, most switched systems still may be stable under certain switching laws, though they do not own a common Lyapunov function. The key idea to select such switching laws is the dwell time [12, 13]. Lately, control theory, which is another effective tool to solve robust stabilization problems, has been well built [14].

On the other hand, time-delay phenomenon is very common in many kinds of engineering systems, for instance, long-distance transportation systems, hydraulic pressure systems, network control systems, and so on. It is regularly a source of instability and often causes undesirable performance and even makes the system out of control. So time-delay systems have also drawn more and more attention [15–23]. Based on the above two aspects, the problem of stability analysis and controller synthesis for switched system with time delay (switched delay system) has aroused growing interest. And switched delay system, as a new brand, can be found in many applications and there are quite a lot of related results [24–34]. However, in the above papers, systems with only one delay are considered. And system with multiple delays, which is widely used in practice, has gained more and more attention [35–38]. For switched systems with multiple time delays, the problem of robust stability is considered in [39]. In [39], delays are constant and appear only in state. In fact, in engineering control design for the actual system, time-varying delays are universal, and due to various reasons delays can also appear in control input. On this occasion, the system will become more complicated and then the response of state may also be affected. In [40], the problem of robust control for nonswitched system with input delays is considered. Motivated by this, it is meaningful to investigate the following problem: if the system in [40] is switched, how is its stability and also how do we design a controller and a switching law to make the system stable? As yet, as far as we know, it has not been fully investigated despite its potential in practical applications, and the purpose of this paper is therefore to shorten such a gap by providing a rather general framework.

The contribution of this paper lies in the following aspects. First, we address the problem of control for a more general class of switched systems with multiple time-varying delays, in which delays not only appear in the state but also appear in the input. Second, by choosing a new set of multiple Lyapunov-Razumikhin functionals (which is relatively less conservative than the CLF approach), we derive sufficient conditions of the existence of state-feedback controller for a class of switching signals with average dwell time scheme; besides, the specific expression of controller is also given in the paper. Third, in this paper, the inequality we derived is easy to compute for it can be rewritten as LMIs.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Firstly, problem formulation and preliminaries are stated in Section 2. In the following section, the main results are addressed. And a numerical example is given in Section 4. Section 5 draws the conclusion.

*Notations*. Throughout this paper, the notation means that is a positive definite (positive-semidefinite, negative-semidefinite, and negative definite) matrix . and denote the maximum and minimum eigenvalues of , respectively; the superscript “” stands for the transpose; denotes the Euclidean norm; represents the space of square integrable vector functions over ; is an identity matrix with appropriate dimension, and if not stated, matrices are assumed to have compatible dimensions. denotes a symmetric matrix.

#### 2. Problem Formulation and Preliminaries

Consider a class of uncertain switched delay systems of the form where , , and are the state vector, input, and output, respectively. which is assumed to belong to is external disturbance input; is the switching signal; , , , , and are given constant matrices with appropriate dimensions; () are the time-varying delays which satisfy the following assumption.

*Assumption 1. *Consider , , , for all .

*Remark 2. *With regard to the switching signal , there exists a switching sequence , which means that when , the th subsystem is activated.

*Remark 3. *In general, the nonlinear uncertainties , , and which refer to the nonlinear internal parameter uncertainties with respect to the current state and delayed states are assumed to satisfy the following inequalities.

*Assumption 4. *Considerwhere , , and are known constant matrices.

*Remark 5. *Compared with the switched system in [39] (where the control input is not contained), in this paper, delays are time varying and control input is also contained with delays, so system (1) is more general and more practical for we can choose a controller to make an unstable system stable.

In this paper, we are interested in designing a state-feedback controller which is described by and a switching law such that system (1) is “robust stable.” Firstly, the relevant definitions are given below.

*Definition 6. *System (1) is said to be exponentially stable under controller and switching law , if, with , the solution of system (1) satisfies where and .

*Definition 7 (see [11]). *For any , let represent the switching number of on . If holds for , , then is called average dwell time.

*Remark 8. *The concept of average dwell time, which was an effective tool for the stability analysis of switched systems, was put forward for continuous switched systems firstly by Hespanha and Morse (see [11]). As commonly used in the literature, we choose in this paper.

*Definition 9 (see [41]). *For , , consider system (1) and design a switching law and controller , if it holds that(1)system (1) is exponentially stable when ;(2)under zero initial conditions system (1) satisfies Then system (1) is said to have exponential performance (weighted -gain).

Now the following lemma which will be used to draw the main results in this paper is presented.

Lemma 10 (see [40]). *For any function vector , symmetric matrix , and constant matrix , it holds that *

*3. Main Results*

*In this paper, we focus on the switched delay system with time-varying delays and constant delays, respectively. And we will tackle the robust control problem for switched delay system (1). When , the “th” subsystem of system (1) is activated. At this moment it can be seen as a “nonswitched” system corresponding to system (1). Based on this, we will first consider the nonswitched system:*

*Lemma 11. Consider the nonswitched system (6). For a given positive definite matrix and constants , , , and , , define withthe linear feedback controller is designed by , , such that the inequality has a positive definite solution , where Then, along the trajectory of the system, when ,For general , where .*

*Proof. *The following proof is motivated by the method in [40].

For the function defined by (7),Using Assumptions 1 and 4 and Lemma 10, we get the following inequalities: Substituting inequalities (14) into (13), it holds that Considering (8), inequality (15) can be expressed asLet in (16); we can get Hence When , it yields that Then, integrating inequalities (18) and (19), respectively, we can get inequalities (11) and (12) in Lemma 11. This completes the proof.

*When the delays in the nonswitched system (6) are constant, we assume that the following conditions hold: where , , and are positive real constants.*

*Lemma 12. For given constants , , , , , , and , such that define where is a positive symmetric definite matrix of the following inequality: Then, along the trajectory of system (6), when , and, for general , where .*

*Proof. *The proof is similar to that of Lemma 11.

For and ,Using a similar step of the proof in Lemma 11, we can obtain the following equality: If we assume inequality (27) becomesConsidering that , it holds thatHence from inequalities (29) and (30), we have Then, when , Similar to Lemma 11, we can get (24) and (25).

*Remark 13. *Assumption (28), that is, , , , in the above proof is commonly used in papers (see [42]).

*Now, we will design a controller and a switching law , under which switched system (1) has exponential performance . Firstly, for system (1) with time-varying delays, the following theorem is given.*

*Theorem 14. For a given matrix and constants , , and , , , if there exist matrices , , and a linear state-feedback controller , , such that has a positive definite solution , where then system (1) is exponentially stable and has weighted -gain for any switching signal with average dwell time satisfying , where satisfies , , , , , , where*

*Proof. *Define a set of Lyapunov-Razumikhin function candidates as follows: Then when and , it follows from Lemma 11 thatand from (36) the following inequality holds at switching instant :Letting , it follows from inequalities (37) and (38) thatLetThenCombining inequalities (39) and (41), we obtainwhich leads to the exponential stability of the switched system (1) with .

Now we will show the weighted -gain of system (1). Firstly for any , using Lemma 10, we have Then considering both inequalities (38) and (43), it holds that This gives Multiplying both sides in (45) by , it yields Observing that and , we have ; consequently Integrating both sides of inequality (47) from to , we obtain This ends the proof.

*Remark 15. *Inequality (33) in Theorem 14 is equivalent to LMIs as follows:where . So it can be calculated easily.

*When the delays in system (1) are constant, we can get the following corollary.*

*Corollary 16. For given constants , , , , , and , , if there exists a linear state feedback controller such that where is a positive symmetric definite matrix of the following inequality: then switched system (1) with constant delays is exponentially stable and has weighted -gain for any switching signal with average dwell time satisfying , where satisfies , .*

*Proof. *Define the Lyapunov-Razumikhin function candidate in Theorem 14 as follows:the proof is similar to that of Theorem 14 by Lemma 12.

*Remark 17. *Inequality (51) is easy to be solved for it can be rewritten as a LMI: where .

*Remark 18. *In [40], conditions are given to guarantee that the nonswitched system with input delays is asymptotically stable. Compared with [40], we get the conditions when the switched system is exponentially stable.

*4. Examples*

*4. Examples*

*To illustrate the main results, we consider the following examples.*

*Example 1. *Consider the time-varying delay switched system where and , , , ; thus , , , , and, , , , . So we have , , , , , , , . And , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , with , , . Then . Let , and , ; solving (33) using Matlab software, we can get and ; besides , , , , . And we can get satisfying the condition of Theorem 14.

Therefore according to Theorem 14, system (54) is exponentially stable and has -gain for any switching signal with average dwell time satisfying . The simulation result is depicted in Figure 1.