Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 982857, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/982857
Research Article

A Note about Certain Arbitrariness in the Solution of the Homological Equation in Deprit’s Method

1Scientific Computing Group (GRUCACI), University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain
2Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR) and Scientific Computing Group (GRUCACI), 26006 Logroño, Spain

Received 1 September 2014; Accepted 2 January 2015

Academic Editor: Jun Jiang

Copyright © 2015 Juan Félix San-Juan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. Krylov and N. N. Bogoliubov, Introduction to Nonlinear Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1947.
  2. G. E. O. Giacaglia, “Notes on von Zeipel's method,” Tech. Rep. X-547-64-161, Goddard Space Flight Center, 1964. View at Google Scholar
  3. H. von Zeipel, “Recherches sur le mouvement des petits planets,” Arkiv för Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 12–13, 1916. View at Google Scholar
  4. G. I. Hori, “Theory of general perturbations with unspecified canonical variables,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, vol. 18, pp. 287–296, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  5. G. I. Hori, “Theory of general perturbations for non-canonical systems,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, vol. 23, pp. 567–587, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Deprit, “Canonical transformations depending on a small parameter,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 1, pp. 12–30, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. H. Poincaré, “Les Méthodes Nouvelles de la Mécanique Céleste: Tome II,” in Méthodes de MM. Newcomb, Gyldén, Lindstedt et Bohlin, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France, 1893. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. H. Ahmed and B. D. Tapley, “Equivalence of the generalized Lie-Hori method and the method of averaging,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. W. A. Mersman, “Explicit recursive algorithms for the construction of equivalent canonical transformations,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 384–389, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. J. A. Morrison, “Generalized method of averaging and the von Zeipel method,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Paper No. 65-687, Monterey, Calif, USA, September 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. H. Shniad, “The equivalence of von Zeipel mappings and Lie transforms,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 114–120, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. N. Watanabe, “Equivalence of the method of averaging and the Lie transform,” Science Reports of the Tohoku Imperial University, First Ser., vol. 57, pp. 11–22, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  13. K. T. Alfriend and S. L. Coffey, “Elimination of the perigee in the satellite problem,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 163–172, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Kozai, “Second-order solution of artificial satellite theory without air drag,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 446–461, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Lara, J. F. San-Juan, and L. M. López-Ochoa, “Precise analytical computation of frozen-eccentricity, low earth orbits in a tesseral potential,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 191384, 13 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. M. Lara, J. F. San-Juan, and L. M. López-Ochoa, “Averaging tesseral effects: closed form relegation versus expansions of elliptic motion,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 570127, 11 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. C. Osácar, Estudio del movimiento de sistemas estelares [Ph.D. Dissertation], Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, 1990.
  18. J. Palacián, J. F. San Juan, and P. Yanguas, “Analytical theory for the spot satellite,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 95, pp. 375–382, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  19. J. F. Palacián and P. Yanguas, “Asymptotic invariant tori of perturbed two-body problems,” Journal of Symbolic Computation, vol. 40, no. 4-5, pp. 1256–1268, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. V. I. Arnold, “Small denominators and problems of stability of motion in classical and celestial mechanics,” Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 91–192, 1963. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. A. Deprit, “The Lissajous transformation. I. Basics,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 201–225, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. A. Elipe and A. Deprit, “Oscillators in resonance,” Mechanics Research Communications, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 635–640, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. M. Efroimsky and P. Goldreich, “Gauge symmetry of the N-body problem in the Hamilton-Jacobi approach,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 5958–5977, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. M. Efroimsky, “Gauge freedom in orbital mechanics,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1065, pp. 346–374, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. Gurfil, “Gauge theory for finite-dimensional dynamical systems,” Chaos, vol. 17, no. 2, Article ID 023107, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. G. Metris and P. Exertier, “Semi-analytical theory of the mean orbital motion,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 294, pp. 278–286, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  27. M. Hénon and C. Heiles, “The applicability of the third integral of motion: some numerical experiments,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 69, pp. 73–79, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. V. Lanchares, A. I. Pascual, J. Palacián, P. Yanguas, and J. P. Salas, “Perturbed ion traps: a generalization of the three-dimensional Hénon–Heiles problem,” Chaos, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 87–99, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus