Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 2452746, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2452746
Research Article

Recursive Reduced-Order Algorithm for Singularly Perturbed Cross Grammian Algebraic Sylvester Equation

1Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
2Electrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq

Received 10 July 2016; Accepted 24 October 2016

Academic Editor: Guangming Xie

Copyright © 2016 Intessar Al-Iedani and Zoran Gajic. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Z. Gajic, Multimodel control and estimation of linear stochastic [Ph.D. Dissertation], Michigan State University, 1984.
  2. T. Grodt and Z. Gajic, “The recursive reduced-order numerical solution of the singularly perturbed matrix differential Riccati equation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 751–754, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. W. Su, Z. Gajic, and X. Shen, “The recursive reduced-order solution of an open-loop control problem of linear singularly perturbed systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 279–281, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. Z. Gajic and M.-T. Lim, Optimal Control of Singularly Perturbed Linear Systems and Applications: High-Accuracy Techniques, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  5. W. C. Su, Z. Gajic, and X. M. Shen, “The exact slow-fast decomposition of the algebraic Ricatti equation of singularly perturbed systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1456–1459, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. Z. Gajic and X. Shen, Parallel Algorithms for Optimal Control of Large Scale Linear Systems, Springer, London, UK, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. I. Borno and Z. Gajic, “Parallel algorithms for optimal control of weakly coupled and singularly perturbed jump linear systems,” Automatica, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 985–988, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. H. Mukaidani, H. Xu, and K. Mizukami, “New iterative algorithm for algebraic riccati equation related to H control problem of singularly perturbed systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1659–1666, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. B. C. Moore, “Principal component analysis in linear systems: controllability, observability, and model reduction,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 17–32, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. K. V. Fernando and H. Nicholson, “On the structure of balanced and other principal representations of SISO systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 228–231, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. V. Sreeram, “Recursive technique for computation of Gramians,” IEE Proceedings D: Control Theory and Applications, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 160–166, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. C. Wan and V. Sreeram, “Solution of the bilinear matrix equation using Astrom-Jury-Agniel algorithm,” IEE Proceedings-D, vol. 140, pp. 21160–2166, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  13. P. Lancaster and M. Tismenetsky, The Theory of Matrices, Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Academic Press, Orlando, Fla, USA, 2nd edition, 1985. View at MathSciNet
  14. U. Baur, “Low rank solution of data-sparse Sylvester equations,” Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 837–851, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. D. C. Sorensen and A. C. Antoulas, “The Sylvester equation and approximate balanced reduction,” Linear Algebra and Its Applications, vol. 351-352, pp. 671–700, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. P. Benner, E. S. Quintana-Ortí, and G. Quintana-Ortí, “Solving stable Sylvester equations via rational iterative schemes,” Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 51–83, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. A. J. Laub, L. M. Silverman, and M. Verma, “Note on cross-grammians for symmetric realizations,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 904–905, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Fernando and H. Nicholson, “On a fundamental property of the cross- Gramian matrix,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 504–505, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. K. V. Fernando and H. Nicholson, “Reachabilty, observability, and minimality of mimo systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 1820–1821, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. V. Fernando and H. Nicholson, “On the cross-Gramian for symmetric MIMO systems,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 487–489, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. P. Kokotovic, H. Khalil, and J. O'Reilly, Singular Perturbation Methods in Control: Analysis and Design, Academic Press, London, UK, 1986.
  22. D. G. Luenberger, Optimization by Vector Space Methods, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1969. View at MathSciNet
  23. A. N. Andry Jr., J. C. Chung, and E. Y. Shapiro, “Modalized observers,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 669–672, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. V. G. Shankar and K. Ramar, “Pole assignment with minimum eigenvalue sensitivity to plant parameter variations,” Internationa Jornal of Control, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 493–504, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J. Pukrushpan, A. Stefanopoulou, and H. Peng, Control of Fuel Cell Power Systems: Principles, Modeling, Analysis and Feedback Design, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2004.
  26. J. Pukrushpan, A. Stefanopoulou, S. Varigonda, J. Eborn, and C. Haugstetter, “Control-oriented model of fuel processor for hydrogen generation in fuel cell applications,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 277–293, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Skataric and Z. Gajic, “Slow and fast dynamics of a natural gas hydrogen reformer,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, no. 35, pp. 15173–15179, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. K. Khalil, “Time scale decomposition of linear implicit singularly perturbed systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1054–1056, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet