Research Article

Determining Sustainable Land Use by Modal Split Shift Strategy for Low Emissions: Evidence from Medium-Sized Cities of China

Table 6

Emission on trips of different purposes.

CityModalWork tripsNonwork trips
Modal split Trip time (min)Velocity (km/h)Total length (km)Emission (g/trip)ModalModal splitTrip time (min)Velocity (km/h)Total length (km)Emission (g/trip)
AvgStdAvgStd

XuzhouWalk15 16.111.63.85.8286.5Walk36 20.714.73.85.74373.8
Bicycle62 23.212.911.5Bicycle39 26.418.211.5
Bus16 36.417.119.4Bus15 36.519.419.4
Car3 23.914.742Car6 25.117.542
Motor4 23.513.731Motor4 23.619.431

ChangshuWalk32 18.610.33.36.7650.2Walk52 27.316.23.36.09555.6
Bicycle34 26.314.412.1Bicycle18 27.11512.1
Bus14 3515.315.5Bus18 38.216.815.5
Car8 362039.5Car9 33.818.939.5
Motor13 21.810.729.9Motor4 31.515.929.9

NantongWalk6 19.413.62.87.3679.7Walk22 23.913.12.87.77806.3
Bicycle55 251410.4Bicycle37 261410.4
Bus9 4315.717.1Bus14 44.717.317.1
Car6 35.719.833.9Car11 35.917.633.9
Motor24 24.913.925.6Motor15 27.917.325.6

KunshanWalk19 16.310.42.95.9529.8Walk66 16.310.42.62.52262.1
Bicycle54 19.111.710.7Bicycle20 19.111.79.7
Bus6 31.911.417.5Bus3 31.911.415.9
Car8 18.87.134.8Car6 18.87.131.7
Motor13 22.718.826.3Motor4 22.718.824

SuzhouWalk17 15.510.22.95.8337.7Walk49 22.510.72.94.9317.6
Bicycle64 24.713.310.7Bicycle33 25.412.710.7
Bus7 48.413.317.5Bus11 49.415.317.5
Car4 38.116.634.8Car3 46.518.134.8
Motor8 21.910.526.3Motor3 28.316.326.3

TonglingWalk55 20.814.434.3340.1Walk63 23.612.235.4568
Bicycle15 23.814.510.7Bicycle9 23.813.410.7
Bus20 34.415.918.3Bus12 39.916.318.3
Car6 25.812.134.4Car9 37.519.436.4
Motor4 16.66.227.5Motor7 23.916.127.5

WenlingWalk7 15.48.93.27.6857.1Walk27 21.715.53.26.27628
Bicycle41 23.19.311.7Bicycle34 21.313.211.7
Bus9 29.611.619.2Bus15 31.614.319.2
Car12 26.39.438.1Car13 25.111.838.1
Motor31 18.910.328.8Motor11 18.213.328.8