Research Article
Investigation of Lab Fire Prevention Management System of Combining Root Cause Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process with Event Tree Analysis
Table 1
Fundamental scale of the AHP [
8].
| Intensity of importance | Definition | Explanation |
| 1 | Equal importance | Two activities contribute equally to the objective | 2 | Weak | — | 3 | Moderate importance | Experience and judgment slightly favor one activity over another | 4 | Moderate plus | — | 5 | Strong importance | Experience and judgment strongly favor one activity over another | 6 | Strong plus | — | 7 | Very strong or demonstrated importance | An activity is favored very strongly over another; its dominance is demonstrated in practice | 8 | Very, very strong | — | 9 | Extreme importance | The evidence favoring one activity over another is of the highest possible order of affirmation | Reciprocals of above | If activity has one of the above nonzero numbers assigned to it when compared with activity , then has the reciprocal value when compared with | A reasonable assumption | Rationales | Ratios arising from the scale | If consistency were to be forced by obtaining numerical values to span the matrix |
|
|