Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 3241973, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3241973
Research Article

A Game of Two Elderly Care Facilities: Competition, Mothballing Options, and Policy Implications

1School of Finance, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China
2China Academy of Financial Research, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received 14 April 2016; Accepted 14 July 2016

Academic Editor: Xiaodong Lin

Copyright © 2016 Congcong Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. R. Smets, “Exporting versus FDI: the effect of uncertainty, irreversibilities and strategic interactions,” Working Paper, Yale University, New Haven, Conn, USA, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. R. Grenadier, “The strategic exercise of options: development Cascades and overbuilding in real estate markets,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1653–1679, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. J. M. Huisman and P. M. Kort, “Effects of strategic interactions on the option value of waiting,” Working Paper, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  4. S. R. Grenadier, “Option exercise games: an application to the equilibrium investment strategies of firms,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 691–721, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. X. Huang and C. Wu, “Option game model of R&D investment decisions in uncertain environment,” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 33–39, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  6. W. Qiu and D. Yu, “Option games model of firm's investment strategy in oligopoly,” Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1220–1230, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. B. Folta and J. P. O'Brien, “Entry in the presence of dueling options,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 121–138, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Pawlina and P. M. Kort, “Real options in an asymmetric duopoly: who benefits from your competitive disadvantage,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–35, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. T. J. Smit and L. Trigeorgis, “Valuing infrastructure investment: an option games approach,” California Management Review, vol. 2, no. 51, pp. 79–100, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  10. P. Suttinon, A. M. Bhatti, and S. Nasu, “Option games in water infrastructure investment,” Journal of Water Resources Planning & Management, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 268–276, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. H. Martzoukosa and E. Zachariasb, “Real option games with R&D and learning spillovers,” Management Science and Environmental Issues, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 236–249, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  12. R. Takashima, M. Goto, H. Kimura, and H. Madarame, “Entry into the electricity market: uncertainty, competition, and mothballing options,” Energy Economics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1809–1830, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G.-X. Zhang, X.-L. Gao, and Y.-L. Wang, “An asymmetric duopoly investment decision-making model based on difference of option,” System Engineering Theory & Practice, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 751–762, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. Gao, G. Zhang, and J. Guo, “Research on the decision-making in low carbon power generation investment based on mothballing option-with the straw power generation projects as the case study,” Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology (Social Science), vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 50–54, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  15. X. Lv and T. Shao, “Option game of asymmetric oligopoly,” Systems Engineering, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 23–27, 2015. View at Google Scholar