Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Volume 2016, Article ID 3295041, 20 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3295041

## Equilibrium Time-Consistent Strategy for Corporate International Investment Problem with Mean-Variance Criterion

^{1}School of Mathematics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China^{2}School of Preparatory Education for Minority Nationalities, Jishou University, Hunan 416000, China^{3}School of Accounting, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received 12 May 2016; Revised 17 July 2016; Accepted 25 August 2016

Academic Editor: Vyacheslav Kalashnikov

Copyright © 2016 Jun Long and Sanyun Zeng. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We analyze a continuous-time model for corporate international investment problem (CIIP) with mean-variance criterion. Based on Nash subgame perfect equilibrium theory, we define an infinitesimal operator and directly derive an extended Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation. Besides, we also obtain the equilibrium time-consistent strategy for CIIP. In addition, we discuss two cases of risk aversion coefficient; one is constant and the other is state dependent. Finally, the simulation results are given to illustrate our conclusions and the influence of some parameters on the optimal solution.

#### 1. Introduction

Generally, a continuous-time stochastic optimal control problem will lead to time inconsistency if the functional has the following form:where is a controlled Markov process and . The term is a control applied at time The local utility function , the terminal utility function , and the nonlinear function are given functions. The reasons are as follows:(1)For a fixed initial point , we can determine the optimal control law through maximizing the functional . But the control law at a later point will no longer be optimal for the functional . This will lead to a time-inconsistent problem.(2)If the term depends on the wealth at time , this will also lead to a time-inconsistent problem.(3)Generally, the term is not an expected value of a nonlinear function of terminal wealth but a nonlinear function of the expected value of terminal wealth, and this will also lead to a time-inconsistent problem.

When , (1) becomes a mean-variance criterion problem. In this paper, we study corporate international investment problem with mean-variance criterion which is time inconsistent.

Because time-inconsistent problem does not satisfy Bellman’s optimality principle, the standard dynamic programming approach fails. In order to deal with time inconsistency, there are three common ways to handle this problem:(1)We dismiss the entire problem as being silly.(2)We fix one initial point, for example, , and then try to find the control law which maximizes We simply consider that, at a later time point such as , the control law is still optimal for the functional This is well known as precommitment in the economics literature.(3)Using game theory approach, we can seriously solve the time-inconsistent problem.

The game theory approach which used Nash equilibrium points to handle time inconsistency has a long history which started with Strotz [1], in which a deterministic Ramsay problem was studied. Further works in continuous and discrete time along this line are provided in Goldman [2], Krusell and Smith [3], Peleg and Yaari [4], Pollak [5], Vieille and Weibull [6], Björk and Murgoci [7], and so on.

More specifically, Björk and Murgoci [7] deduced an extended HJB equation in a discrete time setting and extended it to continuous-time setting by taking formal limits for the discrete problem. Hu et al. [8] studied a general time-inconsistent stochastic linear-quadratic (LQ) control problem and derived a sufficient condition for equilibrium control via a flow of forward-backward stochastic differential equations. Yong [9] studied a time-inconsistent optimal control problem and proved the existence of an equilibrium control via a forward ordinary differential equation coupled with a backward Riccati-Volterra integral equation. Yong [10] considered a general time-inconsistent optimal control problem for stochastic differential equations with deterministic coefficients. Under suitable conditions, they derived a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation for the equilibrium value function of the problem. Czichowsky [11] developed a time-consistent formulation of mean-variance portfolio problem and proved the convergence based on a global description of the locally optimal strategy in terms of the structure condition and the Föllmer-Schweizer decomposition of the mean-variance tradeoff. Yong [12] considered a linear-quadratic optimal control problem for mean-field stochastic differential equations with deterministic coefficients and presented open-loop and closed-loop equilibrium solutions for such kind of problems. Björk and Murgoci [13] studied the problem with state-dependent risk aversion in the sense that the risk aversion is inversely proportional to the current wealth, and they showed that the time-consistent control was linear in wealth. Bensoussan et al. [14] studied the time-consistent strategies in the mean-variance portfolio selection with short-selling prohibition in both discrete and continuous-time settings. Using backward induction, the equilibrium control was shown to be linear in wealth. Wang and Wu [15] studied a partially observed recursive optimization problem. They established Kalman-Bucy filtering equations for a family of parameterized forward and backward stochastic differential equations and obtained the equilibrium control by means of backward separation technique. Cui et al. [16] investigated the effects of portfolio constraints on time consistency of efficiency for convex cone constrained markets and derived the semianalytical expressions for the precommitted efficient mean-variance policy and the minimum-variance signed supermartingale measure (VSSM) and revealed their close relationship. Cui et al. [17] considered a continuous-time mean-variance portfolio optimization problem and derived an explicit time-consistent investment policy.

In addition, there are many literatures concerning time consistency in other areas, for example, reinsurance (Zeng and Li [18], Li et al. [19], Zeng et al. [20], Y. Li and Z. Li [21], Zhao et al. [22], Zhao et al. [23], Li et al. [24], Li et al. [25], Liang and Song [26], and Li et al. [27]), asset-liability management (Wei et al. [28]), pricing (Pirvu and Zhang [29]), dividend strategies (Chen et al. [30]), and jumps (Zeng et al. [20] and Dang and Forsyth [31]).

In recent years, there are some literatures on corporate international investment problem (CIIP). To be more specific, Choi [32] considered the CIIP in which the quantity of output is assumed to be unity, and the dynamic processes of price are assumed to follow Bachelier model. Based on Choi [32], Bellalah and Wu [33] assumed that the quantity of output is a function of output price and the dynamic processes follow geometric Brownian motion model. Their model accounted for the effects of exchange rates, taxes, and information costs on corporate international investment and assumed that firm maximized the present value of manager’s expected utility of net cash flows. Finally, they made a conclusion that information played a central role in foreign investments and explained the “home bias” in international finance. Besides, Wu and Zhang [34], D. Zhang and T. Zhang [35], and Huang and Zhang [36] also studied corporate international investment problem.

However, these prior literatures did not take into account time inconsistency. So, our study tries to explore this problem. In other words, we study the time-inconsistent problem of corporate international investment and deduce a time-consistent strategy for it.

This study contributes to the literature as follows. In the first place, based on Wu and Zhang [34] which considered firms only invested in a real project (home market) and money account and Bellalah and Wu [33] which considered firms only invested in home and foreign market, we investigate those who invest not only in home and foreign market, but also in money account. There is one more point; based on Nash subgame perfect equilibrium theory, we define an infinitesimal operator and directly derive an extended HJB system for the general optimization problem from the prospective of continuous time. Last but not least, combining Björk and Murgoci [7] with Bellalah and Wu [33], we obtain equilibrium time-consistent strategy for corporate international investment problem. In addition, inspired by Björk et al. [37] and Y. Li and Z. Li [21], we discuss not only constant risk aversion coefficient but also state-dependent risk aversion coefficient.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the general optimization problem with mean-variance criterion in continuous time and derive an extended HJB equation directly. In Section 3, we apply this method to corporate international investment problem (CIIP) and deduce the equilibrium time-consistent strategy for CIIP. Some examples illustrating the main features of model are explicitly solved in Section 4. Section 5 contains the main conclusions and some extensions. In the end, some technical details are provided in Appendix.

#### 2. The General Optimization Problem with Mean-Variance in Continuous-Time Setting

Björk and Murgoci [7] discussed the time consistency in a discrete time setting and extended it to a continuous-time setting via limit theory, but their process is complicated. In this section, we focus on the continuous-time problem directly. Based on Nash subgame perfect equilibrium theory, we, applying the dynamic programming approach, define an infinitesimal operator and derive an extended HJB system which is consistent with Björk and Murgoci [7] in continuous time. Compared to Björk and Murgoci [7], our approach avoids the complicated transformation process from discrete time to continuous time. Therefore, our process is more simple and straightforward. To some extent, this study is a good supplement to Björk and Murgoci [7] in continuous time.

In this section, we consider a controlled Markov process in continuous time on the time interval . Define the measurable state space and the measurable control space The dynamic state process is given by where and

##### 2.1. Basic Problem Formulation

For initial point , with a fixed control law , we consider the simplified functional

Firstly, we introduce some definitions as follows.

*Definition 1. *For each and efficient small number , an operator , operating on real valued functions of the form , is defined byA corresponding infinitesimal operator is defined bywhere is the identity operator.

Therefore, the infinitesimal operator can be expressed as

The way that controls are influencing the dynamics of process is formalized by specifying the controlled infinitesimal generator of .

*Definition 2. *Consider a control law (informally viewed as a candidate equilibrium law). For any efficient small number , one chooses a fixed and also fixes an arbitrarily chosen initial point . The control law is defined by If for all , one says that is an equilibrium control law. The equilibrium value function is defined by

##### 2.2. Deriving the Extended HJB System

For convenient description, we use the symbol or to replace or , although may be a determined scalar but not a variable.

Denote that

Then the value function at time can be expressed as Naturally, at the next time with efficient small , the corresponding value function can be expressed as

Taking expectations gives us

By (6), we can construct the corresponding infinitesimal operators with respect to , , , and .

Notice thatThen, the value function at the time can be expressed as

Next, we construct the infinitesimal operator . By (6), (15), and (17), we have

Firstly, notice the three terms , , and in (18); we could construct three corresponding infinitesimal operators , , and ; that is,

Secondly, notice the rest term in (18), which can be expressed as By (11)-(12), we can construct another operator

Therefore, by (18)–(20), the infinitesimal operator can be expressed as

Collecting all results and noticing the fact which is given in (9), we arrive at the extended HJB system which is consistent with Björk and Murgoci [7].

Proposition 3. *The extended HJB system for the Nash equilibrium problem satisfiesHere, is the equilibrium control law which realizes the supremum in the first equation of (22), and , , and are given in (10)–(12).*

*Remark 4. * In the case when does not depend on , the terms are By the infinitesimal operator and the first-order Taylor extension , it is easy to seewhere

(3) A simple calculation shows that (see Björk and Murgoci [7]) In the extended HJB system, the partial derivatives of and should be evaluated at and , respectively.

#### 3. Corporate International Investment Problem with Mean-Variance Criterion

##### 3.1. The Market Setting

Let be a probability space equipped with a filtration satisfying the usual conditions; that is, is right-continuous and -complete, where is a positive finite constant representing the time horizon. Suppose that all stochastic processes and random variables are defined on the filtered probability space

##### 3.2. Corporate International Investment Problem (CIIP)

The purpose of this paper is to study corporate international investment problem (CIIP) that a firm invests in both bank and real project which contains two markets: home market and foreign market. We consider a risk-free asset with dynamic price process where is constant short rate.

Choi [32] supposed a “two-country” firm whose static cash flows for time from its home and foreign operations could be written in a standard way where and were uncertain output and input prices in home (foreign) market, was the quantity of output which was assumed to be certain, and is uncertain exchange rate.

Contrary to the model of Choi [32], Bellalah and Wu [33] took the attitude that the quantity of output was a decreasing function of the output price, and the cash flows of firm’s activity were taxed at a certain rate. Thus they considered that a “two-country” firm’s static cash flows from its home and foreign operations could be written in the following form:where the terms and are negative constants. and are tax rates in home and foreign market, respectively.

Similar to Bellalah and Wu [33], we assume the following dynamics for output price, input price, and exchange rate:The initial values of above variables are , , , , and , respectively. The terms , , , , and are bounded constants which represent the instantaneous expected rates of these variables, respectively. reflects the information cost carried by managers in order to get information about foreign exchange markets. The terms , , and are the instantaneous volatility coefficients in home, foreign, and exchange market. The terms , , and are three one-dimensional mutually dependent Brownian motions which represent the external sources of uncertainty in the markets with correlation coefficients , , and .

The changes in the cash flows from home market can be written as (see Appendix A)where

However, managers should pay sunk costs in order to obtain information. Therefore, they require an additional return to get compensation for their resources engaged in the search for information. Information costs have the dimension of incremental rates of return which are added to the drift in the process describing the dynamics for different variables. So, the real changes in the cash flows from home market should be written aswhere is the information costs rate in home market.

Similarly, the expression of changes in the cash flows from foreign market before exchanging can be written aswhere

Then, from and (32) and (33), the expression of changes in the cash flows from foreign market after exchanging is given bywhere

However, managers also should pay sunk costs in order to obtain information in foreign market. Thus, they also require an additional return to get compensation for their resources engaged in the search for information. So the real changes in the cash flows from foreign market can be expressed as

##### 3.3. The Wealth Process

Suppose that is the corporate wealth at time . Let represent the money invested in home market and represent those invested in foreign market. Then, the rest money is invested in home money account.

From (32), (37), and bank account, we know that the corporate wealth can be written as

We assume that the initial value of corporate wealth and is a locally measurable bounded process, almost surely.

*Definition 5. *A strategy is said to be admissible if it satisfies the following conditions:(i)Stochastic process is -progressively measurable(ii)(iii)The wealth process in (38) has a unique solution on

For convenience, we will write as in next section.

Next, we consider the CIIP with constant risk aversion coefficient and state-dependent risk aversion coefficient, respectively.

##### 3.4. Corporate International Investment Problem (CIIP) with Constant Risk Aversion Coefficient

In this section, we consider the mean-variance model for corporate international investment problem:where is the corporate wealth at time , is the expected value operator under conditions, and is the variance operator under conditions. The terms are the amounts of corporate capital budget invested in home and foreign market, respectively. And is the constant risk aversion coefficient which leads to aggressive or passive corporate investments. The primary motive of an aggressive company, which is usually a leader in the industry and a risk-taker, is to anticipate greater expected return for investing in foreign market. However, the motivation of a passive company, which is a follower and risk-avoider, is to maintain its existing market position rather than to increase it. Generally, this passive company reacts to the leader when the chance of foreign investment has been “proven” (see Choi [32]).

Denote the value functional by The object is to maximize expected return with a risk penalty.

According to the definition of conditional variance we can rewrite our value functional as where and

From Proposition 3 and in Remark 4, the extended HJB system is then given by the following system.

Proposition 6. *The extended HJB system for the Nash equilibrium problem satisfieswhere is the equilibrium control law which realizes the supremum in the first equation of (43).*

Furthermore, we have the following HJB system for corporate international investment problem (CIIP).

Proposition 7. *The extended HJB system for CIIP satisfieswhereand is the equilibrium control law which realizes the supremum in the first equation of (44).*

The term describes the growth rate of the manager’s value function. The term describes the marginal increase of stochastic return. The term reflects the effects of stochastic return. The term represents the home returns volatility. The term reflects the home and foreign returns correlation volatility. And the term shows the home returns and exchange rate correlation volatility. Therefore, the term represents the sum of these two correlation volatilities. The term represents the sum of foreign returns volatility, exchange rate, and their correlation volatility.

By the optimal condition of (44), we can deduce an optimal strategy. Further, by conjecturing the form of value function and incorporating the optimal strategy into extended HJB system, we can obtain the value function.

Theorem 8. *The equilibrium time-consistent strategy for corporate international investment problem (CIIP) is of the following forms:And the value functions and are of the following forms:wherethe terms , , , , and are given in (45), and*

The proof is given in Appendix B.

If we denote that and by (46), we have

Note that , , so we can get the following arguments.

*Remark 9. *If , increases with respect to foreign market information cost , exchange market information cost , and exchange rate and decreases with respect to home market information cost . decreases with respect to , , and and increases with respect to and vice versa.

Now, we explain the economic meanings of the equilibrium time-consistent strategy. By (49), we have For simplifying, we denote that Then, the equilibrium time-consistent strategy in (46) can be expressed as The terms and are referred to as the “speculative demand” or the aggressive demand. The terms and are called the “hedging demand.” They describe the demand for home and foreign investments on risk-hedged basis, respectively.

These expressions of the speculative demand involve some foreign direct investment theories, some of which emphasize the cost advantage of host countries and advance the comparative cost savings offered by foreign production vis-a-vis home production. These are reflected in the terms in and in . Other foreign direct investment theories, however, incorporate the demand side effect. In this case, foreign investment depends on whether output price is higher in foreign market than in home market, which is reflected in the terms in and in . The investment flow is also affected by the exchange rate and the domestic short rate. The effect of exchange rate can be seen in the terms in and in . The effect of short rate can be seen in the terms in and in

We also take into account information costs as well as the degree of competition in home and foreign markets. In fact, if managers do not know about the foreign investment opportunity or they do not want to spend much information cost on foreign and exchange market, they will choose to invest in home market which is referred to as the “home bias puzzle.” Therefore, information plays an important role in foreign investment. It can help managers to make decisions about investment in foreign market. These effects can be seen in the terms in and in .

The hedging demand describes a portfolio story as in Choi [32] and Bellalah and Wu [33]. If the variability of home returns is higher and the correlation between home and foreign returns is lower, managers will increase the foreign investments. In this case, the investment flow is affected by the cross-covariances and the degree of competition in home and foreign markets. These effects are reflected in the terms and

*Remark 10. *We find that the optimal investment strategy does not depend on the wealth process

Inspired by Zeng et al. [20], we can derive the relationship between conditional expectation and conditional variance of terminal wealth for corporate international investment problem (CIIP).

Theorem 11. *The efficient frontier of problem (39) at initial point is given bywhere and are given in (48).*

The proof is given in Appendix C.

*Remark 12. *For all , the relationship between and is given by (54). It is also called the efficient frontier of problem (39) at initial point in the modern portfolio theory.

##### 3.5. Corporate International Investment Problem with State-Dependent Risk Aversion Coefficient

In this section, we consider corporate international investment problem (CIIP) under mean-variance criterion with state-dependent risk aversion coefficient which is discussed in Björk et al. [37]; that is, the value functional is given bywhere

The target of manager is to find the equilibrium time-consistent strategy or optimal solution and the equilibrium value function As indicated in Section 2.2, for these questions, value function (55) can be written as where Note that We recall the probabilistic interpretations From these, we have

By Proposition 3, we get the following results after a large number of elementary calculations.

Proposition 13. *With notations as above, the extended HJB system takes the form and the optimal solution is given by*

The proof is given in Appendix D.

Following Y. Li and Z. Li [21], we have two theorems as follows.

Theorem 14. *The equilibrium time-consistent strategy for CIIP is given bywhere , , , and satisfy the following integral equations:**with and the symbols are given in (45).*

The proof is given in Appendix E.

Theorem 15. *Integral equations (65) admit a unique solution *

The proof can be seen in Y. Li and Z. Li [21].

#### 4. Simulating Results

In this section, we give some simulating results of the optimal investment strategy for CIIP. Suppose that the time unit in the model is one year and let , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and . Besides, let the interest rate , and risk aversion coefficient . For simplifying, we set , , and then .

*Example 16. *In this example, we present that the optimal investment strategy changes with time

As can be seen from Figure 1, the variable increases with respect to time , which shows that the money invested in home market is growing over time. The variable decreases with respect to time , which shows that the money invested in foreign market is declining over time. And the trend of variable , representing the money invested in risk-free asset, is similar to .