Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 3534824, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3534824
Research Article

A Classification Model to Evaluate the Security Level in a City Based on GIS-MCDA

Management Engineering Department, Federal University of Pernambuco, P.O. Box 7462, 50630-970 Recife, PE, Brazil

Received 6 January 2016; Revised 13 April 2016; Accepted 26 April 2016

Academic Editor: Juan C. Leyva

Copyright © 2016 Ciro José Jardim de Figueiredo and Caroline Maria de Miranda Mota. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Kim, T. C. Pratt, and D. Wallace, “Adverse neighborhood conditions and sanction risk perceptions: using SEM to examine direct and indirect effects,” Journal of Quantitative Criminology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 505–526, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Menezes, R. Silveira-Neto, C. Monteiro, and J. L. Ratton, “Spatial correlation between homicide rates and inequality: evidence from urban neighborhoods,” Economics Letters, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 97–99, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. A. Andresen, “Unemployment, business cycles, crime, and the Canadian provinces,” Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 220–227, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Elmes and G. Roedl, “The use of geospatial information technology to advance safer college campuses and communities,” in Crime Modeling and Mapping Using Geospatial Technologies, pp. 389–413, Springer Science, New York, NY, USA, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Frank, M. A. Andresen, and M. Felson, “The geodiversity of crime: evidence from British Columbia,” Applied Geography, vol. 34, pp. 180–188, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. G. Scorzafave and M. K. Soares, “Income inequality and pecuniary crimes,” Economics Letters, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 40–42, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. Malleson and M. Birkin, “Analysis of crime patterns through the integration of an agent-based model and a population microsimulation,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 551–561, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. Roy, Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1996.
  9. E. C. B. Oliveira, L. H. Alencar, and A. P. C. S. Costa, “A decision model for energy companies that sorts projects, classifies the project manager and recommends the final match between project and project manager,” Production, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 91–104, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. A. T. de Almeida, R. J. P. Ferreira, and C. A. V. Cavalcante, “A review of the use of multicriteria and multi-objective models in maintenance and reliability,” IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 249–271, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. G. de Oliveira Silva and A. T. de Almeida-Filho, “A multicriteria approach for analysis of conflicts in evidence theory,” Information Sciences, vol. 346-347, pp. 275–285, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. M. Gurgel and C. M. D. M. Mota, “A multicriteria prioritization model to support public safety planning,” Pesquisa Operacional, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 251–267, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Camacho-Collados, F. Liberatore, and J. M. Angulo, “A multi-criteria Police Districting Problem for the efficient and effective design of patrol sector,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 246, no. 2, pp. 674–684, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Greco, R. Słowiński, and P. Zielniewicz, “Putting Dominance-based Rough Set Approach and robust ordinal regression together,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 891–903, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. S. Dyer, P. C. Fishburn, R. E. Steuer, J. Wallenius, and S. Zionts, “Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: the next ten years,” Management Science, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 645–654, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. E. R. Vaidogas and J. Šakenaite, “Solving the problem of multiple-criteria building design decisions with respect to the fire safety of occupants: an approach based on probabilistic modelling,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 792658, 8 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Shaverdi, M. Akbari, and S. F. Tafti, “Combining fuzzy MCDM with BSC approach in performance evaluation of Iranian private banking sector,” Advances in Fuzzy Systems, vol. 2011, Article ID 148712, 12 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Antucheviciene, Z. Kala, M. Marzouk, and E. R. Vaidogas, “Solving civil engineering problems by means of fuzzy and stochastic MCDM methods: current state and future research,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 362579, 16 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Malczewski, “GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 703–726, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Ligmann-Zielinska and P. Jankowski, “Spatially-explicit integrated uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of criteria weights in multicriteria land suitability evaluation,” Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 57, pp. 235–247, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. Feizizadeh and T. Blaschke, “An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis approach for GIS-based multicriteria landslide susceptibility mapping,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 610–638, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. Joerin, M. Thérialult, and A. Musy, “Using GIS and outranking multicriteia analysis for land-use suitability assesment,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 153–174, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. M. Sánchez-Lozano, J. Teruel-Solano, P. L. Soto-Elvira, and M. Socorro García-Cascales, “Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: case study in south-eastern Spain,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 24, pp. 544–556, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Rikalovic, I. Cosic, and D. Laarevic, “GIS based multi-criteria analysis for industrial site selection,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 69, pp. 1054–1063, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  25. O. Marinoni and A. Hoppe, “Using the analytical hierarchy process to support sustainable use of geo-resources in metropolitan areas,” Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 154–164, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. P. Gbanie, P. B. Tengbe, J. S. Momoh, J. Medo, and V. T. S. Kabba, “Modelling landfill location using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): case study Bo, Southern Sierra Leone,” Applied Geography, vol. 36, pp. 3–12, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. Chen, M. D. Wood, C. Linstead, and E. Maltby, “Uncertainty analysis in a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis tool for river catchment management,” Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 395–405, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Y. Chen, J. Yu, and S. Khan, “The spatial framework for weight sensitivity analysis in AHP-based multi-criteria decision making,” Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 48, pp. 129–140, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Krois and A. Schulte, “GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation to identify potential sites for soil and water conservation techniques in the Ronquillo watershed, northern Peru,” Applied Geography, vol. 51, pp. 131–142, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. Lidouh, Y. De Smet, and E. Zimányi, “An adaptation of the GAIA visualization method for cartography,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multicriteria Decision-Making, 2011.
  31. S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski, “Rough sets methodology for sorting problems in presence of multiple attributes and criteria,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 247–259, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. R. Slowinski, S. Greco, and B. Matarazzo, “Rough set and rule-based multicriteria decision aiding,” Pesquisa Operacional, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 213–269, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Chakhar, A. Ishizaka, A. Labib, and I. Saad, “Dominance-based rough set approach for group decisions,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 251, no. 1, pp. 206–224, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  34. J. Blaszczynski, S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, R. Slowinski, and M. Szelag, “jMAF—dominance-based rough set data analysis framework,” in Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems—Professor Zdzislaw Pawlak in Memoriam, pp. 185–209, Springer, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  35. J. L. Ratton, C. Galvão, M. Fernandez, and C. Galvão, “Pact for life and the reduction of homicides in the State of Pernambuco,” Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  36. S. D. Levitt, “Alternative strategies for identifying the link between unemployment and crime,” Journal of Quantitative Criminology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 377–390, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. P. Fajnzylber, D. Lederman, and N. Loayza, “What causes violent crime?” European Economic Review, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1323–1357, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. F. Zifu, S. Hong, and W. Lihua, “Research of the classification model based on dominance rough set approach for china emergency communication,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 428218, 8 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. V. E. S. Pereira and C. M. D. M. Mota, “Human development index based on ELECTRE TRI-C multicriteria method: an application in the city of Recife,” Social Indicators Research, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 19–45, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. Zopounidis and M. Doumpos, “Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: a literature review,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 229–246, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski, “Dominance-based rough set approach to decision involving multiple decision makers,” in Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, vol. 4259, pp. 306–317, Springer, Kobe, Japan, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  42. S. Chakhar and I. Saad, “Dominance-based rough set approach for groups in multicriteria classification problems,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 372–380, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus