Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 4831867, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4831867
Research Article

An Improved Performance Measurement Approach for Knowledge-Based Companies Using Kalman Filter Forecasting Method

Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

Received 3 July 2016; Accepted 25 August 2016

Academic Editor: Alessandro Lo Schiavo

Copyright © 2016 Mohammad Reza Hasanzadeh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Soroush and F. Amin, “Scheduling in stochastic bicriteria single machine systems with job-dependent learning effects,” Kuwait Journal of Science, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 131–157, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  2. F. Blindenbach-Driessen, J. Van Dalen, and J. Van Den Ende, “Subjective performance assessment of innovation projects,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 572–592, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. T. Anbari, “Earned value project management method and extensions,” Project Management Journal, vol. 34, pp. 12–23, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Plaza, “Team performance and information system implementation,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 10, article 347, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Plaza, O. K. Ngwenyama, and K. Rohlf, “A comparative analysis of learning curves: implications for new technology implementation management,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 200, no. 2, pp. 518–528, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Plaza and K. Rohlf, “Learning and performance in ERP implementation projects: a learning-curve model for analyzing and managing consulting costs,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 72–85, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Plaza and O. Turetken, “A model-based DSS for integrating the impact of learning in project control,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 488–499, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. S. P. Wong, S. O. Cheung, and C. Hardcastle, “Embodying learning effect in performance prediction,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 133, no. 6, pp. 474–482, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Ferreira and D. Otley, The Design and Use of Management Control Systems: An Extended Framework for Analysis. AAA Management Accounting Section 2006 Meeting Paper, 2005.
  10. S. Vandevoorde and M. Vanhoucke, “A comparison of different project duration forecasting methods using earned value metrics,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 289–302, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. O. Ngwenyama, A. Guergachi, and T. Mclaren, “Using the learning curve to maximize IT productivity: a decision analysis model for timing software upgrades,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 524–535, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Bondugula, Optimal Control of Projects Based on Kalman Filter Approach for Tracking & Forecasting the Project Performance, Texas A&M University, 2009.
  13. J. Wang, W. Lin, and Y.-H. Huang, “A performance-oriented risk management framework for innovative R&D projects,” Technovation, vol. 30, no. 11-12, pp. 601–611, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B.-C. Kim and K. F. Reinschmidt, “Probabilistic forecasting of project duration using Kalman filter and the earned value method,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 136, no. 8, pp. 834–843, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. A. Azeem, H. E. Hosny, and A. H. Ibrahim, “Forecasting project schedule performance using probabilistic and deterministic models,” HBRC Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. H. Sadeghi, M. Mousakhani, M. Yazdani, and M. Delavari, “Evaluating project managers by an interval decision-making method based on a new project manager competency model,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1417–1430, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S.-Y. Chou, C.-C. Yu, and G.-H. Tzeng, “A novel hybrid MCDM procedure for achieving aspired earned value project performance,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 9721726, 16 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. S. Qin, S. Liu, and H. Kuang, “Piecewise linear model for multiskilled workforce scheduling problems considering learning effect and project quality,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 3728934, 11 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Abran and L. Buglione, “A multidimensional performance model for consolidating balanced scorecards,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 339–349, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Van Horenbeek and L. Pintelon, “Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection,” Omega, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 33–46, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Yahanpath and S. M. Islam, “A conceptual framework to incorporate ‘risk perspective’ into the balanced scorecard: towards a sustainable performance measurement system,” SSRN 2474481, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  22. L. Malyusz and A. Pem, “Predicting future performance by learning curves,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 119, pp. 368–376, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. A. H. Shah, Examining the Perceived Value of Integration of Earned Value Management with Risk Management-Based Performance Measurement Baseline, Capella University, 2014.
  24. N. Xie, C. Chu, X. Tian, and L. Wang, “An endogenous project performance evaluation approach based on random forests and IN-PROMETHEE II methods,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 601960, 11 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. B.-C. Kim, “Probabilistic evaluation of cost performance stability in earned value management,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 32, no. 1, Article ID 4015025, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y. Hu, J. Wen, and Y. Yan, “Measuring the performance of knowledge resources using a value perspective: integrating BSC and ANP,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1250–1272, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. H. Iranmanesh and Z. T. Hojati, “Intelligent systems in project performance measurement and evaluation,” in Intelligent Techniques in Engineering Management, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  28. H. L. Chen, W. T. Chen, and Y. L. Lin, “Earned value project management: improving the predictive power of planned value,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. B.-C. Kim and K. F. Reinschmidt, “Combination of project cost forecasts in earned value management,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 137, no. 11, pp. 958–966, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. S. Haykin, Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks, Wiley Online Library, 2001.
  31. Q. Li, Y. Ban, X. Niu, Q. Zhang, L. Gong, and J. Liu, “Efficiency improvement of Kalman filter for GNSS/INS through one-step prediction of P matrix,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 109267, 13 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus