Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Mathematical Problems in Engineering / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Advances in Time Series Analysis and its Applications

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 5035160 | 12 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5035160

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Time Series Forecasting Model Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Reasoning

Academic Editor: Reik Donner
Received30 Jun 2015
Revised10 Oct 2015
Accepted20 Oct 2015
Published13 Jan 2016

Abstract

Fuzzy sets theory cannot describe the data comprehensively, which has greatly limited the objectivity of fuzzy time series in uncertain data forecasting. In this regard, an intuitionistic fuzzy time series forecasting model is built. In the new model, a fuzzy clustering algorithm is used to divide the universe of discourse into unequal intervals, and a more objective technique for ascertaining the membership function and nonmembership function of the intuitionistic fuzzy set is proposed. On these bases, forecast rules based on intuitionistic fuzzy approximate reasoning are established. At last, contrast experiments on the enrollments of the University of Alabama and the Taiwan Stock Exchange Capitalization Weighted Stock Index are carried out. The results show that the new model has a clear advantage of improving the forecast accuracy.

1. Introduction

Time series forecasting theory plays an important role in the fields of economy, society, and nature. However, conventional forecasting methods are mainly based on statistical analysis, such as ARMA and ARIMA. These methods have two drawbacks: firstly, they need lots of historical data meeting certain conditions; secondly, they cannot handle linguistic values or imprecise data. Therefore, Song and Chissom [13] proposed the fuzzy time series (FTS) forecasting model which could effectively manage fuzzy information with the combination of fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic.

The basic idea of FTS is that historical data are expressed as fuzzy sets and series variation trends are expressed as fuzzy relations. Data are forecasted by fuzzy reasoning while there are not enough historical data or just some imprecise data. The FTS theory has aroused wide concerns since its first appearance, and lots of excellent works have been done in the past twenty years. Song et al. [4] built a fuzzy stochastic fuzzy time series model focusing on a special kind of fuzzy historical data whose probabilities are also fuzzy sets. Hwang et al. [5] used the variations of historical data instead of the data themselves to build a time-variant FTS model. This model is quite different from Song and Chissom’s one, but it got a more accurate result. Cheng et al. [6] used the probabilities of fuzzy relations to construct a weighted 0-1 matrix for forecasting, which is simpler to calculate than previous models. Aladag and coworkers [7, 8] used an optimization algorithm and artificial neural networks to build a few high-order models, which were obviously superior to first-order models. Singh and Borah [9] developed the model of reference [6] by using the importance of fuzzy relations as their weights. According to this change, they also proposed a new defuzzification method. Huarng [10] discussed the effects of different lengths of intervals to forecast accuracy at the first time and put forward distribution-based length and average-based length to approach this issue. Lu et al. [11, 12] integrated the information granules and granular computing with Chen’s method to get better approaches for universe partition. S.-M. Chen and S.-W. Chen [13] classified the fuzzy relations into three groups: the “downtrend” group, “equal-trend” group, and “uptrend” group. The probabilities of three groups were used to build a two-factor second-order model. In FTS models, the Zadeh fuzzy set [14] is used to fuzzify historical data; namely, there is only one attribute—membership measuring the subjection degree. This is neither objective nor comprehensive and consequently limits the FTS models to deal with uncertain information and improve their forecast accuracy.

The intuitionistic fuzzy set [15] has three indicators to describe data: the membership, the nonmembership, and the intuitionistic index, which make it more objective and careful in fuzzy information description. Therefore, Castillo et al. [16] combined the intuitionistic fuzzy set with time series analysis and put forward an intuitionistic fuzzy reasoning system for data forecasting. However, the main structure was just a weighted average of two subreasoning systems based on membership and nonmembership functions. Joshi and Kumar [17] built the first intuitionistic fuzzy time series (IFTS) forecasting model based on the FTS model, but there is a drawback in the construction of intuitionistic fuzzy set: the intuitionistic index is 0.2 all the time. Zheng et al. [18, 19] used the intuitionistic fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm to get unequal intervals of the universe of discourse, and they also used the trace-back mechanism and vector quantization to forecast. Their models effectively advanced the forecast results, but how to transform the historical data into a suitable form for the intuitionistic fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm is still an urgent problem. The introduction of intuitionistic fuzzy sets dramatically extends the ability for time series to handle with uncertain and imprecise data. It also sets a new research direction for FTS. However, the study on IFTS theory is just getting started. There are only a few academic achievements, and there is a lack of unification and theoretical depth; the forecast accuracy needs further improvement as well.

In view of the above problems, we propose an IFTS model with modifications in three aspects: universe partition, intuitionistic fuzzy set construction, and forecast rules establishment. The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 briefly reviews some concepts on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and intuitionistic fuzzy time series. Section 3 details how to establish the novel IFTS model in four steps. In Section 4, several existing models as well as the proposed model are used to perform profound experiments and validate the effectiveness of the proposed model. Finally, Section 5 gives some conclusions.

2. Basic Concepts

In this section, some basic definitions of intuitionistic fuzzy set and IFTS are presented.

Definition 1. Let be a finite universal set. An intuitionistic fuzzy set in is an object having the formwhere the function defines the degree of membership and the function defines the degree of nonmembership of the element to set . For every , . is called the intuitionistic index of in . It is the hesitancy of to .

When is discrete, the intuitionistic fuzzy set can be noted as

Definition 2. Let and be two finite universal sets. A binary intuitionistic fuzzy relation from to is an intuitionistic fuzzy set in the direct product space :where , for , and .

Definition 3. Let , a subset of , be the universe of discourse on which intuitionistic fuzzy sets are defined. is a collection of and defines an intuitionistic fuzzy time series on .

Definition 4. Let be an intuitionistic fuzzy relation from to . Suppose that is caused only by , denoted aswhere “” is the intuitionistic fuzzy compositional operator. Then is called a first-order intuitionistic fuzzy logical relationship of .

Definition 5. If is independent of time ,then is called a time-invariant intuitionistic fuzzy time series. Otherwise, is called a time-variant intuitionistic fuzzy time series.

The IFTS model studied in this paper is first order and time-invariant.

3. The Novel Intuitionistic Fuzzy Time Series Forecasting Model

The IFTS model can be summarized in four steps as the FTS model:(1)Define and partition the universe of discourse.(2)Construct intuitionistic fuzzy set and intuitionistically fuzzify the historical data.(3)Establish forecast rules and get the forecasted value.(4)Defuzzify and output the forecast result.

The rest of this section will detail the proposed IFTS model following this procedure.

3.1. Unequal Universe Partition Based on Fuzzy Clustering

First of all, the universe of discourse should be defined, where and are the minimum and maximum historical data, respectively. and are two proper positive numbers. Usually, for simplicity, and are chosen to round down and round up to two proper integers.

Secondly, partition the universe into several intervals. References [2123] proved that unequal intervals do not only have actual meanings for regular understanding but also lead to a better outcome than equal ones. Some researchers [22, 24, 25] have already made achievements in this step by adopting methods such as genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization, and fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. But these kinds of methods usually need a huge amount of historical data to get a good performance, which deviates from the small database of historical information of IFTS. What is more, in practice, the IFTS model is generally used for problems which have not too many historical data such as in economic and environmental forecasting. So in this paper, we decide to use a more convenient and real-time method to solve this problem [26].

Let be the universe of objects to be classified, where () has characteristics. Let be the similarity matrix of , where is the similarity between and (). A maximum spanning tree is a tree with all being the vertices and being the weights of every edge. Let be the clustering threshold. Cutting down the edges whose weights are smaller than , we can get a few subtrees. Hence, the vertices of different subtrees make up different groups. The main steps are as follows.

Step 1. Standardize historical data. Since the elements of fuzzy matrix should be in , data in different dimensions should be transformed into the interval to meet the requirement of similarity matrix [26]. Generally, two kinds of transformation are required.
Standard deviation transformation is as follows:where and , , . With this transformation, the mean of every variable becomes 0, the standard deviation becomes 1, and the dimensional differences are eliminated. But it cannot ensure that will locate in .
Range transformation is as follows:where, obviously, .

Step 2. Establish the fuzzy similarity matrix .
Let be the similarity between and ; then we will have a fuzzy similarity matrix . There are different ways to get . Since the Euclidean distance is widely used in similarity matrix establishment [26], we also choose it to calculate :

Step 3. Build a maximum spanning tree and classify historical data.
In this step, the Kruskal algorithm [26] is used to build the maximum spanning tree. Firstly, draw every vertex . Secondly, draw the edges by the value of their weights in descending order, until all of the vertices are connected but with no circles. At last, cut down the edges with smaller weights than the threshold . The vertices of each connected branch make up a group.

Step 4. Calculate the best .
The value of varies from 0 to 1, and the best leads to the best classification. So how to get the best is an important step. In this paper, we also use a widely used -statistic to find the best :where is the number of groups for a given ,   is the number of objects in group (), is the average of the () characteristic of the objects in group , and is the characteristic of all objects. In (9), the numerator represents the distances between groups, and the denominator represents the distances within groups. So the bigger is, the better the classification we get. For a given confidence level , we can find several values of which are larger than . The which leads to the largest is the best , and the corresponding classification is the best as well.
The best classification can be noted aswhere , , , and .
LetTherefore, we partition the universe into unequal intervals: ,  , and  .

3.2. Construction of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

Corresponding to the above intervals, we define intuitionistic fuzzy sets representing linguistic values:Constructing their membership functions and nonmembership functions is the key point in this section.

Since the intuitionistic fuzzy set has a special characteristic, intuitionistic index, the design of membership function and nonmembership function has been quite comprehensive. However, existing methods based on fuzzy statistics, trichotomy, or binary comparison sequencing usually set the intuitionistic index to a fixed value, which does not take full advantage of the intuitionistic fuzzy set [27]. Therefore, according to the characteristics of IFTS intervals, a more objective method is proposed in this section.

First of all, two rules based on objective analysis are as follows:(1)When is located in the middle of an interval, namely, , we define that and .(2)When is located on the boundaries of an interval, namely, , we define that intuitionistic index has the maximum value and . Let ; then we can get .

Then, in view of above rules, the membership function is defined as a Gaussian function:The nonmembership function is a transformation of Gaussian function:Hence, the intuitionistic index function readswhere and , , , and are important function parameters. The calculations of them are based on the above two rules:

Definition 6. Let be an intuitionistic fuzzy set in a finite universe . If(1), ,(2), ,(3),then is a normal intuitionistic fuzzy set.

Therefore, we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 7. The membership function and nonmembership function of are standard; that is, is a normal intuitionistic fuzzy set.

Proof. is a Gaussian function, so we haveTherefore, Given and , we haveHence,On the other hand, since and , we haveTherefore,That is, According to the calculation of , it can be easily found that . This completes the proof.

Theorem 7 shows that the calculation of the membership function and nonmembership function of the intuitionistic fuzzy set is correct and appropriate.

3.3. Forecast Rules Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Reasoning
3.3.1. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple Modus Ponens

Let and be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in universe and let and be intuitionistic fuzzy sets in universe . The generalized multiple modus ponens based on intuitionistic fuzzy relation [27] is that a new proposition that “ is ” can be inferred from propositions: “if is , then is ” and “ is .” The reasoning model is as follows:

Rules:IF is THEN is
IF is THEN is
IF is THEN is
Input:IF is
Output: is

Every rule has a corresponding input-output relation . For , different operators result in different and , but the reasoning outputs are all the same. Since it has a better performance and is easier to calculate than other operators [27], the Mamdani implication operator is used here:where

Then, according to the compositional operation of intuitionistic fuzzy rules, we get the total relation:whereThe reasoning output iswhere “” is defined as the maximum and minimum operators: “” and “”:

3.3.2. Forecast Rules of IFTS Model

Inspired by the intuitionistic fuzzy multiple modus ponens, we exchange the positions of historical data and intuitionistic fuzzy sets in the IFTS model; that is, let the historical data be intuitionistic fuzzy sets, noted as , and let be the elements in , and let and be the membership and nonmembership of to . Then is as follows:where

Hence, we apply the intuitionistic fuzzy multiple modus ponens to and . The reasoning model is as follows:

Rules:IF x is THENy is
IF x is THENy is
IF x is THENy is
IF x is THENy is
Input:IF x is
Output:y is

The reasoning output is as follows:whereSo, the membership and nonmembership of the output intuitionistic fuzzy set areThat is to say, the membership and nonmembership of the forecasted result to every intuitionistic fuzzy set are and .

3.4. Defuzzification Algorithm

The widely used defuzzification algorithms include the maximum truth-value algorithm, gravity algorithm, and weighted average algorithm [27]. In this paper, we utilize the gravity algorithm, which has a more obvious and smoother output than others even when the input has tiny changes [27]. The calculation is as follows:where is the output domain and is an intuitionistic fuzzy set in .

4. Applications

In this section, we focus on two numerical experiments to demonstrate the performance of the proposed IFTS model. In each experiment, several existing FTS and IFTS models are also applied on the same data set to make comparisons. The experimental results and associating analyses are shown, respectively.

4.1. Enrollments of the University of Alabama

The enrollment of the University of Alabama has been firstly used in Song’s paper on FTS model [2]. Since then, this data set has been used by most of the scholars to test their FTS or IFTS models. The detailed test process of our model is as follows.

Step 1. Define and partition the universe of discourse.
The enrollments from year 1971 to 1991 are chosen as historical data to forecast the enrollment of year 1992. In the historical data, and , so the universe of discourse is set to .
Then is partitioned into unequal intervals based on the fuzzy clustering algorithm designed in Section 3.1. The step-by-step details are as follows:

(1) Standardize historical data according to (6) and (7).

(2) Establish the fuzzy similarity matrix as shown in Table 1.


197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991

19711.0000.9190.8710.7390.6170.6410.5940.5530.4030.3850.4690.6220.6110.6670.6640.5340.3950.1890.0580.0010.000
19720.9191.0000.9520.8200.6980.7220.6750.6340.4840.4660.5500.7020.6920.7480.7450.6150.4750.2700.1390.0820.081
19730.8710.9521.0000.8680.7460.7700.7240.6830.5320.5140.5990.7510.7410.7970.7940.6630.5240.3180.1880.1310.129
19740.7390.8200.8681.0000.8780.9020.8560.8150.6640.6460.7310.8830.8730.9290.9260.7950.6560.4500.3200.2630.261
19750.6170.6980.7460.8781.0000.9760.9770.9360.7860.7680.8520.9960.9940.9500.9530.9170.7770.5720.4410.3840.383
19760.6410.7220.7700.9020.9761.0000.9540.9120.7620.7440.8290.9810.9700.9740.9760.8930.7540.5480.4180.3610.359
19770.5940.6750.7240.8560.9770.9531.0000.9590.8080.7910.8750.9730.9830.9270.9300.9390.8000.5950.4640.4070.406
19780.5530.6340.6830.8150.9360.9120.9591.0000.8490.8320.9160.9320.9420.8860.8890.9800.8410.6360.5050.4480.447
19790.4030.4840.5320.6640.7860.7620.8080.8491.0000.9820.9330.7810.7910.7350.7380.8690.9920.7860.6560.5990.597
19800.3850.4660.5140.6460.7680.7440.7910.8320.9821.0000.9160.7630.7740.7180.7210.8510.9900.8040.6730.6160.615
19810.4690.5500.5990.7310.8520.8290.8750.9160.9330.9151.0000.8480.8580.8020.8050.9360.9250.7200.5890.5320.531
19820.6210.7020.7510.8830.9960.9810.9730.9320.7810.7630.8481.0000.9900.9540.9570.9120.7730.5680.4370.3800.379
19830.6110.6920.7410.8720.9940.9700.9830.9420.7910.7740.8580.9901.0000.9440.9470.9220.7830.5780.4470.3900.389
19840.6670.7480.7970.9290.9500.9740.9270.8860.7350.7180.8020.9540.9441.0000.9970.8660.7270.5220.3910.3340.333
19850.6640.7450.7940.9260.9530.9760.9300.8890.7380.7200.8050.9570.9470.9971.0000.8690.7300.5250.3940.3370.336
19860.5340.6150.6630.7950.9170.8930.9390.9800.8690.8510.9360.9120.9220.8660.8691.0000.8610.6550.5250.4680.466
19870.3940.4750.5240.6560.7770.7540.8000.8410.9920.9900.9250.7730.7830.7270.7300.8611.0000.7950.6640.6070.606
19880.1890.2700.3180.4500.5720.5480.5950.6360.7860.8040.7200.5670.5780.5220.5250.6550.7941.0000.8690.8120.811
19890.0580.1390.1880.3200.4410.4180.4640.5050.6560.6740.5890.4370.4470.3910.3940.5250.6640.8691.0000.9430.942
19900.0010.0820.1310.2630.3840.3610.4070.4480.5990.6170.5320.3800.3900.3340.3370.4680.6070.8120.9431.0000.999
19910.0000.0810.1290.2610.3830.3590.4060.4470.5970.6150.5310.3790.3890.3330.3360.4660.6060.8110.9420.9991.000

(3) Use the Kruskal algorithm mentioned in Section 3.1 to build a maximum spanning tree based on matrix . The tree is shown in Figure 1.

Let be 0.93, 0.94, 0.95, and 0.96, respectively. We can get different classifications of historical data as shown in Table 2.


Number of classificationsClassification

0.9357, , , , , , 2.8592.85
0.948, , , , , , , 2.83129.17
0.959, , , , , , , , 2.85142.13
0.95510, , , , , , , , , 2.9112.67

(4) For different classifications, calculate the values of according to (9). The results are also shown in Table 2. From Table 2, we can see that when , its corresponding is maximum and bigger than at the same time. So this classification is the best.

Therefore, the universe of discourse is partitioned into 9 unequal intervals according to the above classification. The boundaries of each interval are calculated according to (11). The intervals are

Step 2. Construct intuitionistic fuzzy sets and intuitionistically fuzzify the historical data.
Corresponding to the 9 intervals, there should be 9 intuitionistic fuzzy sets , and their realistic significance is as follows: “very very very few”, “very very few”, “very few”, “few”, “normal”, “many”, “very many”, “very very many”, “very very very many”. Then calculate the parameters of the membership and nonmembership functions based on Section 3.2. For , the parameters are shown in Table 3.
The membership function, nonmembership function, and intuitionistic index function of every intuitionistic fuzzy set are shown in Figures 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
Then we can calculate the membership, nonmembership, and intuitionistic index of every historical value to every intuitionistic fuzzy set.


Intuitionistic fuzzy set

13154.599.513154.5182.9
13795.5313.513795.5576
14601.5205.914601.5378.3
15553.5407.615553.5748.9
16392132.816392243.9
17066.5301.917066.5554.7
18047.5330.318047.5606.8
18854.5189.818854.5348.7
19574.5274.219574.5503.8

Step 3. Establish forecast rules and forecast the enrollments.
The enrollments of year 1971 to 1991 can be denoted as , and the reasoning model based on Section 3.3.2 is as follows:

Rules:IF x is THENy is
IF x is THENy is
IF x is THENy is
Input:IF x is
Output:y is

Then we get :where the membership of to is the biggest and the nonmembership is the smallest, so the intuitionistic forecasted result is .

Step 4. Defuzzify and output the forecast result.
The defuzzification result based on Section 3.4 isThat is to say, the enrollment of year 1992 is 18855.
To test the performance of our model, we use the models of inference [2], [12], and [17] as well as ours to forecast every year’s enrollment, respectively. The results are shown in Table 4. The models of inference [2, 12] are FTS models, and the model of inference [17] is an IFTS model. In inference [12], there are three kinds of universe partition: 7, 17, and 22 intervals. Since there are only 22 historical data, the 17-interval partition and 22-interval partition are not applicable, so we choose the 7-interval partition.
The root mean square error (RMSE) and average forecast error (AFE) are exploited to evaluate the performance of every model:The results are shown in Table 5.
The results in Tables 4 and 5 indicate that our model can not only reach the forecast goal but also achieve a better result than the other tested models. That is to say, the proposed model is feasible and efficient.


Year Actual enrollmentForecasted enrollment
Model [2]Model [12]Model [17]Our model

19721356314000142791425013500
19731386714000142791424614155
19741469614000142791424614155
19751546015500153921549115539
19761531116000153921549115539
19771560316000153921549115502
19781586116000164671634515502
19791680716000164671634516667
19801691916813171611585016667
19811638816813171611585015669
19821543316789149161585015564
19831549716000153921545015564
19841514516000153921545015564
19851516316000153921549115523
19861598416000154701549115523
19871685916000164671634516799
19881815016813171611795018268
19891897019000192571896118268
19901932819000192571896118780
19911933719000192571896119575
19921887619000192571896118855


CriterionModel [2]Model [12]Model [17]Our model

RMSE677.1445.5418.9350.9
AFE3.35%2.3%2.07%1.72%

4.2. Experiments on TAIEX

The Taiwan Stock Exchange Capitalization Weighted Stock Index (TAIEX) is a typical economic data set widely used in fuzzy time series forecasting [13, 20, 23, 25, 28, 29]. In this experiment, TAIEX values from 11/1/2004 to 12/31/2004 are used as historical data, which are shown in Table 6. The intuitionistic fuzzified value of historical data when forecasted by our model are also shown in Table 6.


DateTAIEXIntuitionistic fuzzified value

11/1/20045656.17
11/2/20045759.61
11/3/20045862.85
11/4/20045860.73
11/5/20045931.31
11/8/20045937.46
11/9/20045945.2
11/10/20045948.49
11/11/20045874.52
11/12/20045917.16
11/15/20045906.69
11/16/20045910.85
11/17/20046028.68
11/18/20046049.49
11/19/20046026.55
11/22/20045838.42
11/23/20045851.1
11/24/20045911.31
11/25/20045855.24
11/26/20045778.26
11/29/20045785.26
11/30/20045844.76
12/1/20045798.62
12/2/20045867.95
12/3/20045893.27
12/6/20045919.17
12/7/20045925.28
12/8/20045892.51
12/9/20045913.97
12/10/20045911.63
12/13/20045878.89
12/14/20045909.65
12/15/20046002.58
12/16/20046019.23
12/17/20046009.32
12/20/20045985.94
12/21/20045987.85
12/22/20046001.52
12/23/20045997.67
12/24/20046019.42
12/27/20045985.94
12/28/20046000.57
12/29/20046088.49
12/30/20046100.86
12/31/20046139.69

For comparison, we also applied the models of reference [2, 13, 17, 20] to forecast TAIEX at the same time. The forecast results of every model are shown in Table 7 and Figure 5.


Actual TAIEXForecasted TAIEX
Model [2]Model [20]Model [13]Model [17]Our model

5656.17
5759.6156755658.975680.55678.95
5862.8558255754.245756.85836.85738.41
5860.7358755863.095865.055866.55852.11
5931.3158755868.045868.445890.235852.11
5937.4659005927.675935.515911.525886.39
5945.259005942.95932.9659685937.47
5948.4959255942.855940.75969.65954.27
5874.5259255952.695945.725969.65852.11
5917.1659005882.565873.159235909.01
5906.6959255931.635919.3658875920.66
5910.8559255908.035905.2758875920.66
6028.6859255912.135906.3559955954.27
6049.4959756037.086030.8859426026.68
6026.5559756042.756051.6959336040.36
5838.4260256010.726025.6358775909.01
5851.159255862.23583758965852.11
5911.315908.335855.495853.35911.525886.39
5855.2459005911.035913.5159335852.11
5778.2659005858.015862.1658335886.39
5785.265858.335773.755785.5757905816.28
5844.7657755783.935780.7657825852.11
5798.6258505844.685841.9557905780.44
5867.9558255817.265797.257785828.67
5893.2758505861.345865.1457575828.67
5919.1758255897.535895.4758245888.54
5925.2859005916.835916.3659115920.66
5892.5159255910.245920.7859425920.66
5913.9759005895.935891.0959005920.66
5911.6359255918.245946.1759005906.75
5878.8959255915.625910.7158525886.39
5909.6559005882.35877.4758525886.39
6002.5859005911.865911.8659905920.66
6019.235941.676002.56004.7860006003.52
6009.3260256027.156026.9460256015.1
5985.9460256012.866004.8260096003.39
5987.8560005991.15984.5259465991.75
6001.5259756005.925995.5659655979.99
5997.6760006005.866009.2360095991.75
6019.4260005997.686005.3860306026.68
5985.9460256026.356016.6560306026.68
6000.5760255987.875985.0260156003.39
6088.4960256018.686008.2860336015.1
6100.8660256086.836085.6860986081.83
6139.6960506099.456098.0561256094.66

The performance of all models is compared in Table 8.


Criterion  Model [2]Model [20]Model [13]Model [17]Our model

RMSE61.1752.6353.6350.2743.23
AFE0.83%0.51%0.65%0.65%0.51%

Table 8 indicates that the RMSE and MSE of proposed model are both smaller than the other models. Therefore, our two experiments both indicate that the IFTS model proposed in this paper could effectively increase forecast accuracy.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, a novel IFTS model is proposed for improving the performance of FTS model. In order to be succinct, we use the maximum spanning tree based fuzzy clustering algorithm to partition the universe of discourse into unequal intervals. According to the characteristics of partitioned data, a more objective method is proposed to ascertain membership function and nonmembership function of the intuitionistic fuzzy set. Besides, intuitionistic fuzzy reasoning is utilized to establish forecast rules, which make the model more sensitive to the fuzzy variation of uncertain data. Finally, based on experiments with two data sets, the feasibility and advantage of the new model are verified.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The research is sponsored by Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 61402517).

References

  1. Q. Song and B. S. Chissom, “Fuzzy time series and its models,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 269–277, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
  2. Q. Song and B. S. Chissom, “Forecasting enrollments with fuzzy time series—part I,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Q. Song and B. S. Chissom, “Forecasting enrollments with fuzzy time series—part II,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Q. Song, R. P. Leland, and B. S. Chissom, “Fuzzy stochastic fuzzy time series and its models,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 333–341, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
  5. J.-R. Hwang, S.-M. Chen, and C.-H. Lee, “Handling forecasting problems using fuzzy time series,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 100, no. 1–3, pp. 217–228, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C.-H. Cheng, Y.-S. Chen, and Y.-L. Wu, “Forecasting innovation diffusion of products using trend-weighted fuzzy time-series model,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1826–1832, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. H. Aladag, M. A. Basaran, E. Egrioglu, U. Yolcu, and V. R. Uslu, “Forecasting in high order fuzzy times series by using neural networks to define fuzzy relations,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 4228–4231, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. Egrioglu, C. H. Aladag, U. Yolcu, V. R. Uslu, and M. A. Basaran, “Finding an optimal interval length in high order fuzzy time series,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 5052–5055, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. Singh and B. Borah, “An efficient time series forecasting model based on fuzzy time series,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2443–2457, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Huarng, “Effective lengths of intervals to improve forecasting in fuzzy time series,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 387–394, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
  11. W. Lu, W. Pedrycz, X. Liu, J. Yang, and P. Li, “The modeling of time series based on fuzzy information granules,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 3799–3808, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. W. Lu, X. Y. Chen, W. Pedrycz, X. D. Liu, and J. Yang, “Using interval information granules to improve forecasting in fuzzy time series,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S.-M. Chen and S.-W. Chen, “Fuzzy forecasting based on two-factors second-order fuzzy-trend logical relationship groups and the probabilities of trends of fuzzy logical relationships,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 405–417, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
  15. K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
  16. O. Castillo, A. Alanis, M. Garcia, and H. Arias, “An intuitionistic fuzzy system for time series analysis in plant monitoring and diagnosis,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1227–1233, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. B. P. Joshi and S. Kumar, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets based method for fuzzy time series forecasting,” Cybernetics and Systems, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 34–47, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K.-Q. Zheng, Y.-J. Lei, R. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Prediction of IFTS based on deterministic transition,” Journal of Applied Sciences—Electronics and Information Engineering, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 204–211, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. K.-Q. Zheng, Y.-J. Lei, R. Wang, and Y.-Q. Xing, “Method of long-term IFTS forecasting based on parameter adaptation,” Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 99–104, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S.-M. Chen, H.-P. Chu, and T.-W. Sheu, “TAIEX forecasting using fuzzy time series and automatically generated weights of multiple factors,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1485–1495, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. Huarng and T. H.-K. Yu, “Ratio-based lengths of intervals to improve fuzzy time series forecasting,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 328–340, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S.-M. Chen and K. Tanuwijaya, “Multivariate fuzzy forecasting based on fuzzy time series and automatic clustering techniques,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 10594–10605, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Q. Cai, D. Zhang, W. Zheng, and S. C. Leung, “A new fuzzy time series forecasting model combined with ant colony optimization and auto-regression,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 74, pp. 61–68, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Q. Cai, D. Zhang, B. Wu, and S. C. H. Leung, “A novel stock forecasting model based on fuzzy time series and genetic algorithm,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 18, pp. 1155–1162, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S.-M. Chen and P.-Y. Kao, “TAIEX forecasting based on fuzzy time series, particle swarm optimization techniques and support vector machines,” Information Sciences, vol. 247, pp. 62–71, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. S. Liang and D. L. Cao, Fuzzy Mathematics and Applications, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2007.
  27. Y. J. Lei, J. Zhao, Y. L. Lu, Y. Wang, Y. Lei, and Z. H. Shi, Theories and Applications of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2014.
  28. K. Huarng and T. H.-K. Yu, “The application of neural networks to forecast fuzzy time series,” Physica A, vol. 363, no. 2, pp. 481–491, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J.-W. Liu, T.-L. Chen, C.-H. Cheng, and Y.-H. Chen, “Adaptive-expectation based multi-attribute FTS model for forecasting TAIEX,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 795–802, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH

Copyright © 2016 Ya’nan Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1340 Views | 735 Downloads | 14 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles