Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 8523604, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8523604
Research Article

Projective Invariants from Multiple Images: A Direct and Linear Method

School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China

Received 3 October 2015; Accepted 3 March 2016

Academic Editor: Antonino Laudani

Copyright © 2016 Yuanbin Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. O. Faugeras, “What can be seen in three dimensions with an uncalibrated stereo rig?” in Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 563–578, Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy, May 1992.
  2. P.-L. Bazin and M. Boutin, “Structure from motion: a new look from the point of view of invariant theory,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1156–1174, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. R. I. Hartley, “Estimation of relative camera positions for uncalibrated cameras,” in Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV '92), G. Sandini, Ed., vol. 588 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 579–587, Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy, May 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Heyden, R. Berthilsson, and G. Sparr, “An iterative factorization method for projective structure and motion from image sequences,” Image and Vision Computing, vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 981–991, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Ramachandran, A. Veeraraghavan, and R. Chellappa, “A fast bilinear structure from motion algorithm using a video sequence and inertial sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 186–193, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Shashua, “Projective structure from uncalibrated images: structure from motion and recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 778–790, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Heyden, “Reconstruction and prediction from three images of uncalibrated cameras,” in Proceedings of the 9th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, pp. 113–126, Uppsala, Sweden, 1995.
  8. A. Heyden and K. Åström, “Algebraic properties of multilinear constraints,” Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, vol. 20, no. 13, pp. 1135–1162, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. L. Quan, “Invariants of six points and projective reconstruction from three uncalibrated images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 34–46, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Sparr, “A common framework for kinetic depth, reconstruction and motion for deformable objects,” in Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV '94), vol. 2, pp. 471–482, Stockholm, Sweden, May 1994.
  11. Y. B. Wang, B. Zhang, and F. H. Hou, “The projective invariants of six 3D points from three 2D uncalibrated images,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization (CSO '10), pp. 486–487, Huangshan, China, May 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. I. Hartley, “Projective reconstruction and invariants from multiple images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1036–1041, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Q.-T. Luong and O. D. Faugeras, “The fundamental matrix: theory, algorithms, and stability analysis,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 43–75, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Oliensis and R. Hartley, “Iterative extensions of the sturm/triggs algorithm: convergence and nonconvergence,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2217–2233, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Sturm and B. Triggs, “A factorization based algorithm for multi-image projective structure and motion,” in Computer Vision—ECCV '96: 4th European Conference on Computer Vision Cambridge, UK, April 15–18, 1996 Proceedings Volume II, vol. 1065 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 709–720, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Tomasi and T. Kanade, “Shape and motion from image streams under orthography: a factorization method,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 137–154, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. Zhang, R. Deriche, O. Faugeras, and Q.-T. Luong, “A robust technique for matching two uncalibrated images through the recovery of the unknown epipolar geometry,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 78, no. 1-2, pp. 87–119, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. C. Longuet-higgins, “A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections,” Nature, vol. 293, no. 5828, pp. 133–135, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. B. Wang, X. W. Wang, B. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “A linear method to derive 3D projective invariants from 4 uncalibrated images,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 109318, 8 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus