Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 9191073, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9191073
Research Article

Stabilization for Damping Multimachine Power System with Time-Varying Delays and Sector Saturating Actuator

1Electrical and Electronic Engineering College, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China
2College of Automation Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China

Received 4 August 2016; Accepted 16 October 2016

Academic Editor: Abdellah Benzaouia

Copyright © 2016 Linlin Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This paper studies the stabilization problem for damping multimachine power system with time-varying delays and sector saturating actuator. The multivariable proportional plus derivative (PD) type stabilizer is designed by transforming the problem of PD controller design to that of state feedback stabilizer design for a system in descriptor form. A new sufficient condition of closed-loop multimachine power system asymptomatic stability is derived based on the Lyapunov theory. Computer simulation of a two-machine power system has verified the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approach.

1. Introduction

To cope with the increasing demand for quality electric power, excitation control, power system stabilizer (PSS), and other power system controllers are playing important roles in power system stability and maintaining dynamic performance. Conventional PSS is mainly designed based on a linear model and considered one operating point. Recently, to interconnect large energy pools connecting neighboring electric grids together and transmit bulk energy during peak times of load demand can satisfy the growing demand for energy [1]. But it introduces some modes of electromechanical oscillations and frequency deviations within the range of 0.2–2 Hz in the power system which will make power system more complicated [2, 3]. A conventional PSS cannot guarantee to have the best performance. Hence, a variety of control strategies have been used to obtain PSS, such as lead-lag controller [4], variable structure controller [57], robust controller [8], PID controller [911], and fuzzy logic controller [10]. Most of the controllers are nonlinear. Some researchers have designed the PSS by using searching algorithms such as genetic algorithms [10, 12], particle swarm optimization [13, 14], and chaotic optimization algorithm [15, 16]. But these algorithms are hard to program and are not sure to find the optimum solutions.

It is well known that the amplitude of the controller is always bounded in the real world [17]. So it is very necessary that the actuator saturation is taken into consideration. Time-delay is very common in power systems which can be a source of instability of performance degradation [18]. Multimachine power system with time-varying delay and sector saturating actuator [19] is a complex interconnected large-scale system that is composed of many electric devices and mechanical components with a better description of real world. The state feedback control problem for such a system is addressed by [19] based on the LMI methods. However, the conditions in [19] are conservative because of the amplifying technique to deal with the nonlinear terms in the conditions. Moreover, we usually cannot find the state feedback controller to satisfy demand when system becomes more complex.

The purpose of this paper is to design a PD controller for damping multimachine power systems with time-varying delay and sector saturating actuator. Under a descriptor transformation, the problem of PD type controller design is transformed into the state feedback controller design for a descriptor system. Then, a new sufficient condition is derived for the admissible of the descriptor system based on the Lyapunov theory. Compared with the existing LMI methods in [19], our method introduces more relax matrix variables. Therefore, it is less conservative. Compared with some of the nondeterministic methods, our method has the advantages of low complexity.

This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 is the problem formulation and preliminaries. Section 3 gives the main results. Section 4 provides an example to show the merits and effectiveness of the results and Section 5 concludes this paper.

Notation. denotes -dimensional Euclidean space; the superscripts and denote the matrix inverse and transpose, respectively; means that is positive definite (positive semidefinite); the star denotes the symmetric term in a matrix.

2. Problem Formulation and Preliminaries

Consider -machine power system with time-varying delays and input constraints which is described by the interconnection of subsystems as follows:where   , = , is the control input vector to the actuator, and is the control input vector to the plant.

is the nonlinear function vector characterizing the interconnection between th generator and th generator withwhere is the time-varying delay and satisfied , , and , .

The nominal system matrices are represented as follows:In this modeling, the single-machine infinite bus is modeled by Heffron-Phillips model which is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Heffron-Phillips model for single-machine power system connected to infinite bus along with SSSC series in the transmission line.

The nonlinear saturation function is considered to be inside sector and is shown in Figure 1, where .

From Figure 2, it is obvious that , where , is a real number which varying between and , .

Figure 2: Sector saturation function.

The control law for a PD controller isSubstituting (4) into (1), we have

Taking the inverse of the left-hand side of (5), we obtain

Properly selecting the controller gains and , so that the closed-loop systems are stable, then we have the PD controller design. It is obvious from (6) that the PD controller is nonlinear. Some researchers have designed such a controller with the aid of searching algorithms [10]. A huge amount of computation burden is foreseeable. In the following, we introduce a new state variable , then system (1) with controller (4) is transformed into the following PD control system:where, and .

System (7) is a descriptor system as ; then, we havewhere and .

The following definition and lemmas will be useful in this paper.

Definition 1 (see [20]). (i) Descriptor systemis said to be regular and impulse-free, if pair is regular and impulse-free.
(ii) System (10) is said to be stable if for any scalar , there exists a scalar such that, for any compatible initial conditions satisfying , solution of system (10) satisfies for any ; moreover, .
(iii) System (10) is said to be admissible if it is regular, impulse-free, and stable.

Lemma 2 (see [18]). For any constant matrix , scalar , and vector function , such that integrations concerned are well defined, the following inequality holds:

Lemma 3. Given any matrices and with appropriate dimensions, the inequalityholds for any matrix .

3. Main Results

In this section, we will give the following condition for system (9).

Theorem 4. The delay descriptor system (9) is admissible with if there exist matrices , , , , , such that the following inequalities hold:where is a fixed scalar which satisfies .

Proof. Firstly, we prove that system (9) with PD gain matrices is regular and impulse-free. System (9) can be rewritten aswhere , matrices , , , , , andFrom (14), it is easy to see thatThat iswhere . Since is descriptor, there exist nonsingular matrices and such thatSupposeEquation (19) yields , which implies that the pair is regular and impulse-free. By Definition 1, system (16) is regular and impulse-free. It also shows that system (9) is regular and impulse-free.
Next, we will show that system (9) is stable. Consider a Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional asTaking the time derivative of along the solution of system (9) yieldsBy Lemma 2, we obtainThen,whereIt is obvious that can be obtained by the following equation:whereIt is obtained from Lemma 3 thatwhere .
Substituting (29) into (27), we obtainwhere ,From (30), we obtain thatwhere andPre- and postmultiply (45) by and its transpose, respectively, where , and define , , and ; we arrive atBy Schur complement, (44) is equivalent to (14).
Pre-and postmultiplying (34) by and its transpose, respectively, and by Schur complement, (34) is equivalent to (15).
Since is nonsingular, there exist two nonsingular matrices and such thatDenote , where and . We obtainBy (30), we obtain that there exists scalar such thatwhich impliesThen, , and .
Thus,Next, we will prove that , which is equivalent to the stability of system (5).
Pre-and postmultiplying (32) by and its transpose, respectively, we obtainPre- and postmultiplying (42) by and its transpose, respectively, we obtain , which implies thatUsing the expression in (37), the singular delay system (16) can be decomposed asNoting that, for any , there exists positive integer .
Such that , and considering (44), we haveThis, together with (43) and (41), we obtain , and this completes the proof.

Remark 5. Theorem 4 provides a PD control method for system (1). An LMI based criterion is obtained by transforming a regular system into the state feedback stabilizer design for a descriptor system. It is worth noting that if , , , , and are replaced with , , , , and , the state feedback controller can be solved by the following corollary. It is obvious that Theorem 4 has wider range of application.

Corollary 6. The delay system (5) with is stable with if there exist matrices , , , , , such that the following inequalities hold:where is a fixed scalar which satisfies .

Remark 7. Both Theorem 4 and Corollary 6 are LMIs. The solutions of , are obtained, and the corresponding controller gain matrices are derived as . Our method is a deterministic method which can be solved easier than some of the nondeterministic methods, such as the genetic algorithm [10] and particle swarm optimization [13].

Remark 8. Compared with Theorem in [19], Corollary 6 is less conservative in two aspects. Firstly, By using constraint (48), , and in Corollary 6 can be variables matrices, while relatives , in Theorem in [19] are fixed scalars. Secondly, the integral term in the proof is enlarged by using Lemma 2 instead of being removed in the proof in [19].

4. Simulation

In this section, a two-machine infinite bus example system is chosen to show the effectiveness of the proposed method, which is shown in Figure 3. The system parameters used in the simulation are as follows:

Figure 3: Connecting diagram of two-machine system.

If we set and , so varies between 0.4 and 0.9. The upper bound of delay and . The method in [19] fails to find a state feedback controller for this system. According to Theorem 4, the PD controller can be solved as

The close-loop state trajectories of generator 1-2 are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: The close-loop state trajectories.

5. Conclusion

In this paper, a decentralized PD control scheme has been proposed to deal with the time-delay multimachine power system with sector saturating actuator. A sufficient condition of closed-loop system asymptomatic stability is presented in terms of LMIs, which can be solved easily by LMI toolbox. Then, a sufficient condition of state feedback control is also obtained which is less conservative than that in [19]. A two-machine infinite bus system is considered as an example, and the simulation result shows the effectiveness of proposed method.

Nomenclature

:Constant of either 1 or 0 and means that th generator has no connection with th generator
:th row and th column element of nodal susceptance matrix at the internal nodes after eliminated all physical buses, in pu
:Inertia constant for th generator, in seconds
:Damping coefficient for th generator, in pu
:Relative speed for th machine, in radian/s
:Rotor angle for th machine, in radian
:The synchronous machine speed
Internal transient voltage for th and th machine, in pu, which are assumed to be constant
:The initial values of
:The generator power for th machine
:The generator stimulus voltage for th machine.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. A. Khodabakhshian and R. Hemmati, “Robust decentralized multi-machine power system stabilizer design using quantitative feedback theory,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 112–119, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control, Prentice-Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  3. P. M. Anderson and A. A. Fouad, Power System Control and Stability, IEEE Press, 1997.
  4. A. M. El-Zonkoly, A. A. Khalil, and N. M. Ahmied, “Optimal tunning of lead-lag and fuzzy logic power system stabilizers using particle swarm optimization,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 2097–2106, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. G. D. C. Samarasinghe and N. C. Pahalawaththa, “Design of universal variable-structure controller for dynamic stabilisation of power systems,” IEE Proceedings: Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 141, no. 4, pp. 363–368, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Kenné, A. M. Fombu, and J. D. D. Nguimfack-Ndongmo, “Coordinated excitation and steam valve control for multimachine power system using high order sliding mode technique,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 131, pp. 87–95, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Fernández-Vargas and G. Ledwich, “Variable structure control for power systems stabilization,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 101–107, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Q. Zhao and J. Jiang, “Robust controller design for generator excitation systems,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 201–209, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. S. Ali Nandar, “Robust PI control of smart controllable load for frequency stabilization of microgrid power system,” Renewable Energy, vol. 56, pp. 16–23, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y.-J. Lin, “Proportional plus derivative output feedback based fuzzy logic power system stabiliser,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 301–307, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. S. Baumud and A. R. Shamekh, “A comparative study between the performance of the fixed gain PID and the adaptive self-tuning power system stabilisers,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Power System Technology (PowerCon '02), vol. 2, pp. 1233–1238, Kunming, China, October 2002.
  12. M. G. Jolfaei, A. M. Sharaf, S. M. Shariatmadar, and M. B. Poudeh, “A hybrid PSS-SSSC GA-stabilization scheme for damping power system small signal oscillations,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 75, pp. 337–344, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. E. Mostafa, M. A. El-Sharkawy, A. A. Emary, and K. Yassin, “Design and allocation of power system stabilizers using the particle swarm optimization technique for an interconnected power system,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. A. Singh, K. A. Muraleedharan, and K. Gomathy, “Particle swarm intelligence tuned fuzzy controller for damping modal oscillations of power system,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON '08), pp. 1–6, Hyderabad, India, November 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Chatterjee, S. P. Ghoshal, and V. Mukherjee, “Chaotic ant swarm optimization for fuzzy-based tuning of power system stabilizer,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 657–672, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Shayeghi, H. A. Shayanfar, S. Jalilzadeh, and A. Safari, “Multi-machine power system stabilizers design using chaotic optimization algorithm,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1572–1580, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. Xi, G. Feng, D. Cheng, and Q. Lu, “Nonlinear decentralized saturated controller design for power systems,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 539–547, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Gu, V. L. Kharitonov, and J. Chen, Stability of Time-Delay Systems, Birkhäauser, Boston, Mass, USA, 2003.
  19. M.-P. Sun, X.-H. Nian, and H. Pan, “Delay-dependent robust stabilization for steam valve opening of uncertain time-delay multi-machine power system with sector saturating actuator,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 153–159, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Xu and J. Lam, Robust Control and Filtering of Singular Systems, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006. View at MathSciNet