Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 9721726, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9721726
Research Article

A Novel Hybrid MCDM Procedure for Achieving Aspired Earned Value Project Performance

1Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 43, Section 4, Keelung Road, Taipei 106, Taiwan
2Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, College of Public Affairs, National Taipei University, No. 151, University Road, San Shia, New Taipei City 23741, Taiwan
3Institute of Management of Technology, National Chiao Tung University, No. 1001, Ta-Hsueh Road, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan

Received 30 December 2015; Revised 14 April 2016; Accepted 19 April 2016

Academic Editor: Danielle Morais

Copyright © 2016 Shou-Yan Chou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, Pa, USA, 5th edition, 2013.
  2. J. R. Meredith, S. M. Shafer, S. J. Mantel, and M. M. Sutton, Project Management in Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 5th edition, 2013.
  3. J. K. Pinto, Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage, Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2007.
  4. J. Batselier and M. Vanhoucke, “Evaluation of deterministic state-of-the-art forecasting approaches for project duration based on earned value management,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1588–1596, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. H. Kwak and F. T. Anbari, “History, practices, and future of earned value management in government: perspectives from NASA,” Project Management Journal, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 77–90, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. T. Anbari, “Earned value project management method and extensions,” Project Management Journal, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 12–23, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  7. Q. W. Fleming and J. M. Koppelman, Earned Value Project Management, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, Pa, USA, 2nd edition, 2000.
  8. J. Colin and M. Vanhoucke, “Setting tolerance limits for statistical project control using earned value management,” Omega, vol. 49, pp. 107–122, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J.-S. Lee, “Calculating cumulative inefficiency using earned value management in construction projects,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 222–232, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. Lipke, “Is something missing from project management?” Crosstalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, pp. 16–19, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  11. E. Kim, W. G. Wells Jr., and M. R. Duffey, “A model for effective implementation of Earned Value Management methodology,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 375–382, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. W. Stratton, The Earned Value Management Maturity Model, Management Concepts, Inc, Vienna, Austria, 2006.
  13. J. Colin and M. Vanhoucke, “A comparison of the performance of various project control methods using earned value management systems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 3159–3175, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Rayner and G. Reiss, Portfolio and Programme Management Demystified: Managing Multiple Projects Successfully, Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2013.
  15. K. P. Yoon and C. L. Hwang, Multiple-Criteria Decision Making: An Introduction, vol. 104, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 1995.
  16. R. Ley-Borrás, “Deciding on the decision situation to analyze: the critical first step of a decision analysis,” Decision Analysis, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 46–58, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. J. J. H. Liou, “New concepts and trends of MCDM for tomorrow—in honor of Professor Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng on the occasion of his 70th birthday,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 367–375, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. J. H. Liou and G. H. Tzeng, “Comments on: multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 672–695, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. F.-K. Wang, C.-H. Hsu, and G.-H. Tzeng, “Applying a hybrid MCDM model for six sigma project selection,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 730934, 13 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. H. Zanakis, A. Solomon, N. Wishart, and S. Dublish, “Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 507–529, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C.-W. Hsu, T.-C. Kuo, S.-H. Chen, and A. H. Hu, “Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 56, pp. 164–172, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. Govindan, D. Kannan, and M. Shankar, “Evaluation of green manufacturing practices using a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with PROMETHEE,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 53, no. 21, pp. 6344–6371, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. J. H. Liou, C.-Y. Tsai, R.-H. Lin, and G.-H. Tzeng, “A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality,” Journal of Air Transport Management, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 57–61, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. W.-Y. Chiu, G.-H. Tzeng, and H.-L. Li, “A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 48–61, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y.-P. Ou Yang, H.-M. Shieh, and G.-H. Tzeng, “A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment,” Information Sciences, vol. 232, pp. 482–500, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G.-H. Tzeng and J.-J. Huang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2011. View at MathSciNet
  27. M.-T. Lu, S.-K. Hu, L.-H. Huang, and G.-H. Tzeng, “Evaluating the implementation of business-to-business m-commerce by SMEs based on a new hybrid MADM model,” Management Decision, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 290–317, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. ANSI-EIA, Earned Value Management Systems. ANSI-EIA-748-98, A. N. S. I. E. I. Alliance, American National Standards Institute, Arlington, Va, USA, 1998.
  29. A. Gabus and E. Fontela, World Problems an Invitation to Additionally Thought within the Framework of DEMATEL, Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland, 1972.
  30. M.-T. Lu, G.-H. Tzeng, H. Cheng, and C.-C. Hsu, “Exploring mobile banking services for user behavior in intention adoption: using new hybrid MADM model,” Service Business, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 541–565, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Y. Chou, G. H. Tzeng, and C. C. Yu, “A novel hybrid multiple attribute decision making procedure for aspired agile application,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ISPE Inc. International Conference on Concurrent Engineering: Transdisciplinary Lifecycle Analysis of Systems, vol. 2, pp. 152–161, July 2015.
  32. T. L. Saaty, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 1996.
  33. H. A. Simon, “A behavioral model of rational choice,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 99–118, 1955. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. S. Opricovic and G.-H. Tzeng, “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 445–455, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Opricovic, Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems, vol. 2, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia, 1998.
  36. F.-H. Chen and G.-H. Tzeng, “Probing organization performance using a new hybrid dynamic MCDM method based on the balanced scorecard approach,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 924–937, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K.-Y. Shen, M.-R. Yan, and G.-H. Tzeng, “Combining VIKOR-DANP model for glamor stock selection and stock performance improvement,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 58, pp. 86–97, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. K. W. Huang, J. H. Huang, and G. H. Tzeng, “New hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for improving competence sets: enhancing a company's core competitiveness,” Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 175, 2016. View at Google Scholar