Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 2874954, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2874954
Research Article

An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Stochastic Decision-Making Method Based on Case-Based Reasoning and Prospect Theory

1College of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212003, China
2School of Computer Science and Informatics, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK
3College of Mathematic Sciences, Yangzhou University, Jiangsu 225002, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Cuiping Wei; moc.nuyila@gnipiuc_iew

Received 23 January 2017; Revised 23 March 2017; Accepted 30 March 2017; Published 24 April 2017

Academic Editor: Franck Massa

Copyright © 2017 Peng Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Inuiguchi, K. Kato, and H. Katagiri, “Fuzzy multi-criteria optimization: possibilistic and fuzzy/stochastic approaches,” in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, pp. 851–902, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  2. Y. H. Subagadis, N. Schütze, and J. Grundmann, “A fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for multiple criteria decision analysis of coupled groundwater-agricultural systems,” Water Resources Management, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2075–2095, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. X. Zhang, G. Huang, H. Zhu, and Y. Li, “A fuzzy-stochastic power system planning model: reflection of dual objectives and dual uncertainties,” Energy, vol. 123, pp. 664–676, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. V. Mohagheghi, S. M. Mousavi, and B. Vahdani, “A new multi-objective optimization approach for sustainable project portfolio selection: a real-world application under interval-valued fuzzy environment,” Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 41–68, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  5. P. Soleymani, S. M. Mousavi, B. Vahdani, and A. Aboueimehrizi, “A new fuzzy multi-objective optimisation method with desirability function under uncertainty,” International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 100–120, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S.-M. Yu, J. Wang, and J.-Q. Wang, “An interval type-2 fuzzy likelihood-based MABAC approach and its application in selecting hotels on a tourism website,” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 47–61, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. J.-Q. Wang, J.-J. Kuang, J. Wang, and H.-Y. Zhang, “An extended outranking approach to rough stochastic multi-criteria decision-making problems,” Cognitive Computation, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1144–1160, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. B. Vahdani, S. M. Mousavi, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, and H. Hashemi, “A new design of the elimination and choice translating reality method for multi-criteria group decision-making in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Applied Mathematical Modelling. Simulation and Computation for Engineering and Environmental Systems, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1781–1799, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. H. Hashemi, J. Bazargan, and S. M. Mousavi, “A compromise ratio method with an application to water resources management: an intuitionistic fuzzy set,” Water Resources Management, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 2029–2051, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. M. Mousavi, B. Vahdani, and S. Sadigh Behzadi, “Designing a model of intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR in multi-attribute group decision-making problems,” Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 45–65, 2016. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. S. M. Mousavi, S. Mirdamadi, A. Siadat, J. Dantan, and R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, “An intuitionistic fuzzy grey model for selection problems with an application to the inspection planning in manufacturing firms,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, pp. 157–167, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S.-M. Chen and C.-H. Chang, “A novel similarity measure between Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on transformation techniques with applications to pattern recognition,” Information Sciences, vol. 291, pp. 96–114, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. Y. Song, X. Wang, and H. Zhang, “A distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy belief functions,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 86, pp. 288–298, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Z. Xu and H. Liao, “A survey of approaches to decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 80, pp. 131–142, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Hashemi, J. Bazargan, S. M. Mousavi, and B. Vahdani, “An extended compromise ratio model with an application to reservoir flood control operation under an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Applied Mathematical Modelling. Simulation and Computation for Engineering and Environmental Systems, vol. 38, no. 14, pp. 3495–3511, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. J.-Q. Wang, K.-J. Li, and H.-Y. Zhang, “Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach based on prospect score function,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 27, pp. 119–125, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Cao, H. Zhou, and J. Wang, “An approach to interval-valued intuitionistic stochastic multi-criteria decision-making using set pair analysis,” International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, pp. 1–12, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. P. Wang, X. Xu, J. Wang, and C. Cai, “Some new operation rules and a new ranking method for interval-valued intuitionistic linguistic numbers,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1069–1078, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. S. Yu, J. Wang, and J. Wang, “An extended TODIM approach with intuitionistic linguistic numbers,” International Transactions in Operational Research, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. S.-P. Wan and D.-F. Li, “Fuzzy mathematical programming approach to heterogeneous multiattribute decision-making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees,” Information Sciences, vol. 325, pp. 484–503, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. J. Q. Wang and J. J. Li, “Intuitionistic random multi-criteria decision-making approach based on score functions,” Control and Decision, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1297–1306, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. P. Li, S. F. Liu, and J. J. Zhu, “Intuitionistic fuzzy stochastic multi-criteria decision-making methods based on prospect theory,” Control and Decision, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1601–1606, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. H. Zhou, J. Wang, and H. Zhang, “Stochastic multicriteria decision-making approach based on SMAA-ELECTRE with extended gray numbers,” International Transactions in Operational Research, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. H. Zhou, J. Wang, and H. Zhang, “Grey stochastic multi-criteria decision-making based on regret theory and TOPSIS,” International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 651–664, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. H. Zhou, J. Q. Wang, and H. Y. Zhang, “Grey stochastic multi-criteria decision-making approach based on prospect theory and distance measures,” The Journal of Grey System, vol. 29, pp. 15–33, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  27. Y. Chen, D. M. Kilgour, and K. W. Hipel, “Screening in multiple criteria decision analysis,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 278–290, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Y.-T. Chen and M.-C. Chiu, “A case-based method for service-oriented value chain and sustainable network design,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 269–294, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. Koo and T. Hong, “A dynamic energy performance curve for evaluating the historical trends in the energy performance of existing buildings using a simplified case-based reasoning approach,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 92, pp. 338–350, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Yan, H. Shao, and P. Wang, “A soft-sensing method of dissolved oxygen concentration by group genetic case-based reasoning with integrating group decision making,” Neurocomputing, vol. 169, pp. 422–429, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Z.-P. Fan, Y.-H. Li, and Y. Zhang, “Generating project risk response strategies based on CBR: a case study,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 2870–2883, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. Evans, “Re-thinking case-based assessments in business management education,” International Journal of Management Education, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 161–166, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Z. Xu, “Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1179–1187, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. M. Chen and J. M. Tan, “Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 163–172, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  35. J. Ye, “Improved method of multicriteria fuzzy decision-making based on vague sets,” Computer Aided Design, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 164–169, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. P. D. Liu, F. Jin, X. Zhang, Y. Su, and M. Wang, “Research on the multi-attribute decision-making under risk with interval probability based on prospect theory and the uncertain linguistic variables,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 554–561, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. L. Sun and M. Widdicks, “Why do employees like to be paid with Options?: A multi-period prospect theory approach,” Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 38, pp. 106–125, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. Yang and G. Jiang, “Development of an enhanced route choice model based on cumulative prospect theory,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 168–178, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Y. Liu, Z.-P. Fan, and Y. Zhang, “Risk decision analysis in emergency response: a method based on cumulative prospect theory,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 42, pp. 75–82, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. L. Wang, Z.-X. Zhang, and Y.-M. Wang, “A prospect theory-based interval dynamic reference point method for emergency decision making,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 23, pp. 9379–9388, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. F. Liu and Y. Lin, Grey Information: Theory and Practical Applications, Springer, London, UK, 2006.
  42. X.-H. Xu, Z.-J. Du, and X.-H. Chen, “Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 79, pp. 150–160, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus