Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 3817805, 8 pages

https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3817805

## Pinning Adaptive Synchronization of Delayed Coupled Dynamical Networks via Periodically Intermittent Control

^{1}School of Electronic Engineering and Intelligentization, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523000, China^{2}City College, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523000, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Shengbing Xu

Received 9 April 2017; Accepted 30 August 2017; Published 9 October 2017

Academic Editor: R. Aguilar-López

Copyright © 2017 Xueliang Liu and Shengbing Xu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

This paper investigates the exponential synchronization problem of delayed coupled dynamical networks by using adaptive pinning periodically intermittent control. Based on the Lyapunov method, by designing adaptive feedback controller, some sufficient conditions are presented to ensure the exponential synchronization of coupled dynamical networks with delayed coupling. Furthermore, a numerical example is given to demonstrate the validity of the theoretical results.

#### 1. Introduction

Complex networks have received a great deal of attention due to their many potential practical applications [1, 2]. A family of dynamically interacting units composes a kind of complex networks which can exhibit a number of emerging phenomena. Among various dynamical behaviors of complex networks, synchronization is a significant and interesting phenomenon, such as synchronization phenomena on the Internet, synchronization transfer of digital or analog signals in communication network, and synchronization related to biological neural networks. Recently, much works have been devoted to research the synchronization problem of complex networks [3–5].

In the case where the network cannot synchronize by itself, in order to drive the network to synchronize, many effective control techniques have been reported, such as feedback control [6], sampled-data control [7], adaptive control [8, 9], pinning control [10], impulsive control [11], and intermittent control [12]. In [9], the synchronization of a class of complex network by adding an adaptive controller to all nodes has been discussed. But in practice, it is too costly and impractical to add controllers to all nodes in a large-scale network. To reduce the number of controlled nodes, pinning control is introduced [10], in which controllers are only applied to partial nodes. This case of control techniques has been earlier reported in paper [11–14]. In addition, the adaptive pinning control method, which is utilized to get the appropriate control gains effectively, has received considerable research attention. An adaptive pinning control method is proposed in [15] to synchronize for a delayed complex dynamical network with free coupling matrix. Besides these, there are many literatures to study adaptive pinning control problems of networks [16–18].

One the other hand, intermittent control has been widely used in engineering fields due to its practical and easy implementation in engineering control. In recent years, many important and interesting results on stabilization and synchronization of delayed dynamical networks by using intermittent control have been obtained. Based on -norm, authors in [19] investigated a class of Cohen-Grossberg neural networks with time-varying delays by designing a periodically intermittent controller. In [20], by using periodically intermittent control, Gan studied the stochastic neural networks with leakage delay and reaction-diffusion terms; some new and less conservative synchronization conditions based on -norm were derived. The pinning periodically intermittent control is used to achieve the synchronization of delayed complex network [21, 22]. To the best of our knowledge, the problem of adaptive pinning synchronization for delayed coupled dynamical networks has received very little research attention.

In this paper, we aim to further investigate adaptive pinning synchronization of delayed coupled dynamical network via periodically intermittent control. By using Lyapunov stability theory and designing adaptive feedback control gains, several criteria are given to guarantee synchronization of delayed coupled dynamical networks. A numerical simulation is also presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

#### 2. Model and Preliminaries

Consider the complex network consisting of nodes and the th node described by the following state equation:where is the state variable of node at time ; , , and are system matrices, and are continuous vector functions, and is the internal delay. and are inner coupling matrices between the connected nodes and at time and , where is the transmittal delay. and are the configuration matrices; if there is a link from node to node at time (at time ), then (), where . Otherwise, (). It is assumed that and satisfy the diffusive coupling connection, and . are the control inputs. Note that the coupling configuration matrix and matrices and are not assumed to be symmetric.

The initial conditions of (1) are given by , , and , where . To discuss global synchronization with one delay coupling, we define the set as the synchronization manifold for network (1). For all , the dynamical equation of satisfies

Define error states as . Then, we can derive the following error dynamical system:

For convenience of statements, one has following assumption.:There exists positive constants , for any , such that

In order to derive the main results, the following definitions and lemmas are needed in this paper.

Lemma 1 (see [20]). *Let be a continuous function such that is satisfied for If ; then where and is the smallest real root of the equation *

Lemma 2 (see [20]). *Let be a continuous function such that is satisfied for If , then where .*

Lemma 3 (see [6]). *Let . Then for any .*

#### 3. Main Result

In order to realize synchronization of the couple network by pinning periodically intermittent control, some controllers are added to selected partial nodes, and the controllers can be described by where denotes the control period, , :and is the adaptive feedback strength for which the update law is to be designed. When the error system (4) can be rewritten asWhen , the error system (4) can be rewritten as

Our objective is to design suitable and such that the delayed couple network can realize synchronization. The main results are stated as follows.

Theorem 4. *Suppose that Hypothesis holds, and , where . If there exist positive constants , such that *(i)*,*(ii)*,*(iii)*,*(iv)*,*(v)*,**where , , and is the unique positive solution of the equation , and choosing the adaptive lawthen the controlled couple network (1) is globally exponentially synchronized.*

*Proof. *Construct the following Lyapunov function: where and , are positive constants.

Then the derivative of with respect to time along the solutions of (14) and (15) can be calculated as follows: when , for , we getBased on Lemma 3, we havewhere , and .

Substituting (16) into the following expression, one hasUsing exchange of rows and columns, it is easy to getwhere .

By following the similar steps denoted in (22), we get thatwhere .

Substituting (19)–(23) into (18), we have Define , and based on conditions (i) and (ii) of Theorem 4, one getsSimilarly, based on condition (i) and (iii) of Theorem 4, when , we haveIn the following, we will prove that conditions (iv) and (v) imply Take and . For , based on (25) and by using Lemma 1, we obtain where is the smallest real root of the equation Thus, we have For , based on (26), we haveFrom Lemma 2, and noting that , we obtainFor , based on (25) and by using Lemma 1, we obtain Consider that ; then For , one can repeat the same argument and get similar results to (31) and (32). It can be deduced from Lemma 2 thatBy induction, we can derive the following estimation of for any integer . For Form the definition of and condition (v) of Theorem 4, we obtain This implies the conclusion and the proof is complete.

When , only delayed coupling exists in the networks. One has the following corollary.

Corollary 5. *Suppose that Hypothesis holds, and where . If there exist positive constants , such that *(i)*,*(ii)*,*(iii)*,*(iv)*,*(v)*,**where , , and is the unique positive solution of the equation , and choosing the adaptive law as (16), then the controlled couple network (1) is globally exponentially synchronized.*

When , there is no delayed coupling in the coupled networks.

Corollary 6. *Suppose that Hypothesis holds, and where . If there exist positive constants , such that *(i)*,*(ii)*,*(iii)*,*(iv)*,*(v)*,**where and is the unique positive solution of the equation , and choosing the adaptive law as (16), then the controlled couple network (1) is globally exponentially synchronized.*

#### 4. Numerical Simulation

In this section, we present a numerical simulation to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of our results.

Consider the coupled network (1) consisting of identical Chua oscillators with time delayed nonlinearity. The dynamics of the Chua oscillator is given bywhere , , , and :the other parameters of network are given as follows: The dynamical behavior of the synchronization manifold is shown in Figure 1.