Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 5187521, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5187521
Research Article

Product Form Design Model Based on Multiobjective Optimization and Multicriteria Decision-Making

1Department of Industrial Design, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1 University Road, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
2Department of Multimedia and Entertainment Science, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 1 Nantai Street, Yungkang District, Tainan 71005, Taiwan

Correspondence should be addressed to Yongfeng Li; moc.liamtoh@rdilfy

Received 18 July 2016; Accepted 28 November 2016; Published 11 January 2017

Academic Editor: Thomas Hanne

Copyright © 2017 Meng-Dar Shieh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Nagamachi, Kansei/Affective Engineering, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2010.
  2. K.-C. Wang and F.-R. Ju, “An innovative design methodology KKBDCA for affective product development,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 629708, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. Kittidecha and A. C. Marasinghe, “Application of Kansei Engineering and Box-Behnken response surface methodology for shape parameter design: a case study of wine glass,” Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1–12, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  4. S.-W. Hsiao, F.-Y. Chiu, and S.-H. Lu, “Product-form design model based on genetic algorithms,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 237–246, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Guo, W. L. Liu, F. T. Liu, H. Wang, and T. B. Wang, “Emotional design method of product presented in multi-dimensional variables based on Kansei Engineering,” Journal of Engineering Design, vol. 25, no. 4–6, pp. 194–212, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Deb, Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK, 2001. View at MathSciNet
  7. M. H. Ahmadi, M. A. Ahmadi, R. Bayat, M. Ashouri, and M. Feidt, “Thermo-economic optimization of Stirling heat pump by using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 91, pp. 315–322, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Padhye and K. Deb, “Multi-objective optimisation and multi-criteria decision making in SLS using evolutionary approaches,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 458–478, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D.-H. Lee, K.-J. Kim, and M. Köksalan, “A posterior preference articulation approach to multiresponse surface optimization,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 210, no. 2, pp. 301–309, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  10. J. Branke, MCDA and Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2016.
  11. L. T. Bui and S. Alam, Multi-Objective Optimization in Computational Intelligence: Theory and Practice, IGI Global, Hershey, Pa, USA, 2008.
  12. C.-C. Yang, “Constructing a hybrid Kansei engineering system based on multiple affective responses: application to product form design,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 760–768, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Jiang, C. K. Kwong, Y. Liu, and W. H. Ip, “A methodology of integrating affective design with defining engineering specifications for product design,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 2472–2488, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Nagamachi, “Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 289–294, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Matsubara and M. Nagamachi, “Hybrid Kansei engineering system and design support,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 81–92, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. Tjalve, A Short Course in Industrial Design, Newnes-Butterworths, London, UK, 1979.
  17. K. H. Hyun, J.-H. Lee, M. Kim, and S. Cho, “Style synthesis and analysis of car designs for style quantification based on product appearance similarities,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 483–494, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. C. Yadav, R. Jain, A. R. Singh, and P. K. Mishra, “Aesthetical design of a car profile: a Kano model-based hybrid approach,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 67, no. 9–12, pp. 2137–2155, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H.-H. Lai, Y.-M. Chang, and H.-C. Chang, “A robust design approach for enhancing the feeling quality of a product: a car profile case study,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 445–460, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Cluzel, B. Yannou, and M. Dihlmann, “Using evolutionary design to interactively sketch car silhouettes and stimulate designer's creativity,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1413–1424, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H.-Y. Chen, Y.-M. Chang, and T.-C. Tung, “Comparison of two quantitative analysis techniques to predict the evaluation of product form design,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 989382, 9 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H.-C. Tsai, S.-W. Hsiao, and F.-K. Hung, “An image evaluation approach for parameter-based product form and color design,” Computer-Aided Design, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 157–171, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Toghyani, A. Kasaeian, S. H. Hashemabadi, and M. Salimi, “Multi-objective optimization of GPU3 Stirling engine using third order analysis,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 87, pp. 521–529, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. A. Coello Coello, G. B. Lamont, and D. A. Van Veldhuizen, Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2007. View at MathSciNet
  25. C. Igel, N. Hansen, and S. Roth, “Covariance matrix adaptation for multi-objective optimization,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. Srinivas and K. Deb, “Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 221–248, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G.-H. Tzeng and J.-J. Huang, Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2011. View at MathSciNet
  29. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  30. P. J. van Laarhoven and W. Pedrycz, “The use of parametric programming in fuzzy linear programming,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 11, no. 1-3, pp. 243–251, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. J. J. Buckley, “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 233–247, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. N. Cross, Engineering Design Methods: Stragies for Prouduct Design, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 4th edition, 2008.
  33. S.-W. Hsiao and C.-H. Chen, “A semantic and shape grammar based approach for product design,” Design Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 275–296, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. Klir and B. Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, NJ, USA, 1995. View at MathSciNet
  35. C. K. Kwong and H. Bai, “A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 367–377, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C.-H. Yeh, H. Deng, and Y.-H. Chang, “Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companies,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 459–473, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  37. A. R. Lee, Application of Modified Fuzzy AHP Method to Analyze Bolting Sequence of Structural Joints, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa, USA, 1995.
  38. S.-W. Hsiao and Y.-C. Ko, “A study on bicycle appearance preference by using FCE and FAHP,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 264–273, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. Kahraman, Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Developments, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
  40. R. T. Marler and J. S. Arora, “Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 369–395, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  41. M. Camargo, L. Wendling, and E. Bonjour, “A fuzzy integral based methodology to elicit semantic spaces in usability tests,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K.-C. Wang, “A hybrid Kansei engineering design expert system based on grey system theory and support vector regression,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 8738–8750, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus