Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 6549791, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6549791
Research Article

A Group Decision-Making Model Based on Regression Method with Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations

School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Yifei Du; moc.361@666_dfy

Received 1 November 2016; Revised 17 November 2016; Accepted 8 December 2016; Published 3 January 2017

Academic Editor: Fazal M. Mahomed

Copyright © 2017 Min Xue and Yifei Du. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill International Book Co., New York, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  2. S. A. Orlovsky, “Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 155–167, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. F. Chiclana, F. Herrera, and E. Herrera-Viedma, “Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems. An International Journal in Information Science and Engineering, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera, F. Chiclana, and M. Luque, “Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 98–109, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. H.-B. Yan and T. Ma, “A group decision-making approach to uncertain quality function deployment based on fuzzy preference relation and fuzzy majority,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 241, no. 3, pp. 815–829, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. Z. S. Xu, “Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making,” Omega, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 249–254, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Dong, Y. Xu, and H. Li, “On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 430–444, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Xu, H. Sun, and H. Wang, “Optimal consensus models for group decision making under linguistic preference relations,” International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1201–1228, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 837–852, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  10. H. Liao, Z. Xu, X.-J. Zeng, and D.-L. Xu, “An enhanced consensus reaching process in group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations,” Information Sciences, vol. 329, pp. 274–286, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. V. Torra, “Hesitant fuzzy sets,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 529–539, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  12. R. M. Rodríguez, L. Martinez, and F. Herrera, “Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 109–119, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. R. M. Rodríguez, L. Martínez, and F. Herrera, “A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 241, pp. 28–42, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. D. Yu, W. Zhang, and Y. Xu, “Group decision making under hesitant fuzzy environment with application to personnel evaluation,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 52, pp. 1–10, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S.-M. Chen and J.-A. Hong, “Multicriteria linguistic decision making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and the aggregation of fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 286, pp. 63–74, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Liao, Z. Xu, and M. Xia, “Multiplicative consistency of hesitant fuzzy preference relation and its application in group decision making,” International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 47–76, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Wei, N. Zhao, and X. Tang, “Operators and comparisons of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 575–585, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. Meng, X. Chen, and Q. Zhang, “Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy Shapley hybrid operators and their application in multi-attribute decision making,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 28, pp. 599–607, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Z. Zhang, C. Wang, and X. Tian, “A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 86, pp. 77–101, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. J. Xu, L. Chen, R. M. Rodríguez, F. Herrera, and H. M. Wang, “Deriving the priority weights from incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 99, pp. 71–78, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. M. Xia and Z. Xu, “Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 395–407, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. G. Wei, “Hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 31, pp. 176–182, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Xia and Z. Xu, “Managing hesitant information in GDM problems under fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 865–897, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. Z. M. Zhang and C. Wu, “Deriving the priority weights from hesitant multiplicative preference relations in group decision making,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 25, pp. 107–117, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. He, Z. Xu, and J. Gu, “An approach to group decision making with hesitant information and its application in credit risk evaluation of enterprises,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 43, pp. 159–169, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. B. Zhu and Z. Xu, “Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 35–45, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. Wang and Z. Xu, “Some consistency measures of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations,” Information Sciences, vol. 297, pp. 316–331, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. Y. Dong, X. Chen, and F. Herrera, “Minimizing adjusted simple terms in the consensus reaching process with hesitant linguistic assessments in group decision making,” Information Sciences, vol. 297, pp. 95–117, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  29. R. M. Rodríguez, B. Bedregal, H. Bustince et al., “A position and perspective analysis of hesitant fuzzy sets on information fusion in decision making. Towards high quality progress,” Information Fusion, vol. 29, pp. 89–97, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. B. Zhu and Z. Xu, “Regression methods for hesitant fuzzy preference relations,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 19, pp. S214–S227, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Tanino, “Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 117–131, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. S. Lipovetsky and W. Michael Conklin, “Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 110–122, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  33. J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi, “A “soft” measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences,,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 316–325, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  34. L. Mikhailov, “A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 341–349, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. Mikhailov, “A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 687–704, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  36. B. Zhu and Z. Xu, “A fuzzy linear programming method for group decision making with additive reciprocal fuzzy preference relations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 246, pp. 19–33, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. B. Zhu and Z. Xu, “Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 239, no. 3, pp. 794–801, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  38. R. E. Bellman and L. A. Zadeh, “Decision-making in a fuzzy environment,” Management Science. Journal of the Institute of Management Science. Application and Theory Series, vol. 17, pp. B141–B164, 1970/71. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  39. F. Meng and X. Chen, “A new method for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 73, pp. 111–123, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S.-M. Chen, T.-E. Lin, and L.-W. Lee, “Group decision making using incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency,” Information Sciences, vol. 259, pp. 1–15, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  41. C.-H. Chiu, T.-M. Choi, and C. S. Tang, “Price, rebate, and returns supply contracts for coordinating supply chains with price-dependent demands,” Production and Operations Management, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 81–91, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. X. Chen and Q. Zhou, “Loss-averse retailer's optimal ordering policies for perishable products with customer returns,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 831796, 5 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  43. N. Wan and X. Chen, “Bilateral coordination strategy of supply chain with bidirectional option contracts under inflation,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 369132, 16 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  44. W. Ho, X. Xu, and P. K. Dey, “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. K. S. Moghaddam, “Fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order allocation in reverse logistics systems under supply and demand uncertainty,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 15-16, pp. 6237–6254, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. S. H. Ghodsypour and C. O'Brien, “A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 56-57, pp. 199–212, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus