Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 7908737, 16 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7908737
Research Article

A Hybrid Approach for Evaluating Faulty Behavior Risk of High-Risk Operations Using ANP and Evidence Theory

1Hubei Key Laboratory of Construction and Management in Hydropower Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
2Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Image Processing and Intelligent Control, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Jian-Lan Zhou; moc.361@9991ljuohz

Received 22 March 2017; Revised 27 June 2017; Accepted 19 July 2017; Published 24 August 2017

Academic Editor: Danielle Morais

Copyright © 2017 Xia-Zhong Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Huang, X. Xuan, R. Qiu, and G. Liu, “Statistical analysis on production safety accidents of heavy casualties of the period 2001-2011 in China,” in Proceedings of the 2012 8th International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology, ISSST 2012, pp. 950–958, chn, October 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. K. Sovacool, “The costs of failure: A preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, 1907-2007,” Energy Policy, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1802–1820, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Madigan, D. Golightly, and R. Madders, “Application of Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) to UK rail safety of the line incidents,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 97, pp. 122–131, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Ergai, T. Cohen, J. Sharp, D. Wiegmann, A. Gramopadhye, and S. Shappell, “Assessment of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability,” Safety Science, vol. 82, pp. 393–398, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S.-T. Chen, A. Wall, P. Davies, Z. Yang, J. Wang, and Y.-H. Chou, “A Human and Organisational Factors (HOFs) analysis method for marine casualties using HFACS-Maritime Accidents (HFACS-MA),” Safety Science, vol. 60, pp. 105–114, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. G. Lenné, P. M. Salmon, C. C. Liu, and M. Trotter, “A systems approach to accident causation in mining: An application of the HFACS method,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 48, pp. 111–117, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J.-L. Zhou, B. Zhe-Hua, and Z.-Y. Sun, “Safety assessment of high-risk operations in hydroelectric-project based on accidents analysis, SEM, and ANP,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 530198, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. M. Patterson and S. A. Shappell, “Operator error and system deficiencies: analysis of 508 mining incidents and accidents from Queensland, Australia using HFACS,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1379–1385, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Y. Daramola, “An investigation of air accidents in Nigeria using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) framework,” Journal of Air Transport Management, vol. 35, pp. 39–50, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. F. R. Liu and J.-H. Lai, “Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: A hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 5119–5136, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. K. Marhavilas, D. Koulouriotis, and V. Gemeni, “Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000-2009,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 477–523, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. A. White and G. E. Johnson, “Genetic toxicology at the crossroads-from qualitative hazard evaluation to quantitative risk assessment,” Mutagenesis, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 233–237, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. A. Patel and K. N. Jha, “Evaluation of construction projects based on the safe work behavior of co-employees through a neural network model,” Safety Science, vol. 89, pp. 240–248, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. Azhiri, R. Teimouri, M. Ghasemi Baboly, and Z. Leseman, “Application of Taguchi, ANFIS and grey relational analysis for studying, modeling and optimization of wire EDM process while using gaseous media,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 71, no. 1-4, pp. 279–295, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Chemweno, L. Pintelon, A. Van Horenbeek, and P. Muchiri, “Development of a risk assessment selection methodology for asset maintenance decision making: An analytic network process (ANP) approach,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 170, pp. 663–676, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R.-H. Huang, C.-L. Yang, and C.-S. Kao, “Assessment model for equipment risk management: Petrochemical industry cases,” Safety Science, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1056–1066, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Nilashi, R. Zakaria, O. Ibrahim, M. Z. A. Majid, R. M. Zin, and M. Farahmand, “MCPCM: A DEMATEL-ANP-Based Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate the Critical Success Factors in Construction Projects,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 343–361, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Digioia, C. Foglietta, G. Oliva, and S. Panzieri, “Aware online interdependency modelling via evidence theory,” International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, vol. 9, no. 1-2, pp. 74–92, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Li, G. Qing, P. Li, and T. Yin, “Operational Risk Assessment of Distribution Network Equipment Based on Rough Set and D-S Evidence Theory,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, pp. 1–7, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. G. Curcurù, G. M. Galante, and C. M. La Fata, “Epistemic uncertainty in fault tree analysis approached by the evidence theory,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 667–676, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. Zhang, X. Deng, D. Wei, and Y. Deng, “Assessment of E-Commerce security using AHP and evidential reasoning,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 3611–3623, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X. Y. Su, Y. Deng, S. Mahadevan, and Q. L. Bao, “An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft engine rotor blades,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 26, pp. 164–174, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. Guo and W. Li, “Combination rule of D-S evidence theory based on the strategy of cross merging between evidences,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 13360–13366, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Q. Zhan, W. Zheng, and B. Zhao, “A hybrid human and organizational analysis method for railway accidents based on HFACS-Railway Accidents (HFACS-RAs),” Safety Science, vol. 91, pp. 232–250, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J.-L. Zhou, Z.-H. Bai, and Z.-Y. Sun, “A hybrid approach for safety assessment in high-risk hydropower-construction-project work systems,” Safety Science, vol. 64, pp. 163–172, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y.-T. Chen and M. C. Chen, “Using chi-square statistics to measure similarities for text categorization,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 3085–3090, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. J. Masirevic, “On new formulas for the cumulative distribution function of the noncentral chi-square distribution,” Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics, vol. 14, no. 2, Art. 66, 13 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. J. T. Roscoe and J. A. Byars, “An investigation of the restraints with respect to sample size commonly imposed on the use of the chi-square statistic,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 66, no. 336, pp. 755–759, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. I. W. H. Fung, V. W. Y. Tam, T. Y. Lo, and L. L. H. Lu, “Developing a risk assessment model for construction safety,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 593–600, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Badri, S. Nadeau, and A. Gbodossou, “Proposal of a risk-factor-based analytical approach for integrating occupational health and safety into project risk evaluation,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 48, pp. 223–234, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Y. Dong, Q. Li, Y. Ding, and Z. Peng, “ETTA-IM: A deep web query interface matching approach based on evidence theory and task assignment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 10218–10228, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. Abdullah and L. Najib, “A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 3297–3305, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. H.-C. Liu, M.-L. Ren, J. Wu, and Q.-L. Lin, “An interval 2-tuple linguistic MCDM method for robot evaluation and selection,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 2867–2880, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Hartley, “Some thoughts on Likert-type scales,” International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 83–86, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Kokangül, U. Polat, and C. Dağsuyu, “A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodologies,” Safety Science, vol. 91, pp. 24–32, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Daǧdeviren, I. Yüksel, and M. Kurt, “A fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) model to identify faulty behavior risk (FBR) in work system,” Safety Science, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 771–783, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus